Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The One You've Been Waiting For

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 01:39 PM
Original message
The One You've Been Waiting For
“Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival.”

- Winston Churchill

We hold these truths to be self-evident.

Nicole Frye and Bryan Spry are dead because of George W. Bush. Both died in Iraq. Both were 19 years old. William Ramirez was also 19 years old, as was Holly McGeogh. Luis Moreno and Nathan Nakis, Jeffrey Braun and Jason Wright, Joey Whitener and Steven Acosta and Rachel Bosveld, all were 19 years old when they died in Iraq. Ryan Thomas and Michael Mihalakis were 18 when they died in Iraq. They join the 544 American soldiers who have been killed there in less than a year.

They were lied to, as were we all, and now they are forever young in death. The lie they, and we, were fed still sits on the White House website. You can find the lie if you go to www.WhiteHouse.gov and do a search for the page titled ‘Disarm Saddam Hussein.’ The page is still there, in all its dishonest glory, even today. The page will tell you that Iraq possesses 26,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin, and 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent. 500 tons, for those without calculators, equals 1,000,000 pounds.

Hide that.

This White House page likewise claims Iraq is in possession of 30,000 munitions capable of delivering the 64,000 liters of anthrax and botulinum toxin no one can find, along with the 1,000,000 pounds of sarin, mustard and VX gas no one can find. Better still, the page claims a connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda that never existed and cannot be proven.

Best of all, the page claims that Iraq was seeking uranium from Niger for use in a nuclear weapons program. This was the lie that Bush used in his State of the Union address, to the humiliation of us all. This was the lie that motivated Ambassador Joseph Wilson to speak out on the pages of the New York Times. This was the lie that motivated White House staffers to take revenge against Wilson by exposing his CIA wife, Valerie Plame, thus sparking a federal investigation. This was the lie that might bring down the administration. It is still on the White House website.

We hold these truths to be self-evident.

The American people continue to be kept almost completely in the dark regarding the events of September 11. Very nearly a thousand days have passed since the attacks, and yet the best we have to work with is “Evildoers who hate our freedom.” The best we have to work with is an unnecessary invasion of Iraq as a substitute for actual answers and actions. Had the Bush administration been given what it wanted, the best we would have had to work with was master secret-keeper Henry Kissinger chairing a hand-picked investigation committee that would have come armed with pens, paper and buckets of whitewash.

The families of the September 11 dead have published some questions they would like to see George W. Bush answer publicly. Among them are:

Beginning with the transition period between the Clinton administration and your own, and ending on 9/11/01, specifically what information (either verbal or written) about terrorists, possible attacks and targets, did you receive from any source? This would include briefings or communications from out-going Clinton officials, CIA, FBI, NSA, DoD and other intelligence agencies, foreign intelligence, governments, dignitaries or envoys, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, and/or Richard Clarke, former counterterrorism czar.

Specifically, what did you learn from the August 6, 2001, PDB about the terrorist threat that was facing our nation? Did you request any follow-up action to take place? Did you request any further report be developed and/or prepared?

As Commander-in-Chief, from May 1, 2001 until September 11, 2001, did you receive any information from any intelligence agency official or agent that UBL was planning to attack this nation on its own soil using airplanes as weapons, targeting New York City landmarks during the week of September 11, 2001 or on the actual day of September 11, 2001?

Please explain why no one in any level of our government has yet been held accountable for the countless failures leading up to and on 9/11?

Do you continue to maintain that Saddam Hussein was linked to al Qaeda? What proof do you have of any connection between al-Qaeda and the Hussein regime?

No one on the entire earth has more moral authority on this issue than the wives, husbands, brothers, sisters, mothers and fathers of the men and women who were killed that day. To ignore their demand for answers is to slap them across the face. To ignore their demand is to kill their loved ones all over again. These questions must be answered in the broad light of day.

We hold these truths to be self-evident.

Since George W. Bush came to Washington DC, some 2.2 million jobs have evaporated. Last year, the administration promised to create 1.7 million new jobs, a promise that went laughably unfulfilled. Just last week, the administration promised to create either 2.6 million new jobs or 3.8 million new jobs, depending upon which administration official you chose to listen to.

These White House predictions are so off-the-scale ludicrous that the administration officials charged with shepherding the economy have refused to have anything to do with them. Both Treasury Secretary John Snow and Commerce Secretary Donald Evans have put as much distance as political physics will allow between themselves and these predictions. "Macroeconomic models are based on a lot of assumptions," said Secretary Snow, who further stated that such things are, "not without a range of error."

Indeed. The “range of error” may well be found in the fact that this administration has promised millions of new jobs while simultaneously – and by ‘simultaneously’ I mean within the pages of the same economic report – claiming that the outsourcing of millions of American jobs to foreign countries is a good thing for the economy and the American people. Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich asked a pointed question about this which has gone unanswered: “In which country will these jobs be created?” They won’t be created in America, for Americans.

We hold these truths to be self-evident.

Seldom in the history of American politics has the Democratic Party fielded a more competent, patriotic, excellent group of candidates for the office of the Presidency than that which has been in the running to date. A case can be made, however, that each has bruises on their records as progressives; from voting for the Iraq War Resolution to voting for the PATRIOT Act to espousing right-leaning economic principles to questionable allegiance to a woman’s right to choose, each and every candidate has failed the purity test somewhere along the line.

Yet held against the appalling record compiled by the Bush administration to date, of which the issues raised above comprise only a damnable fraction, the truth is as self-evident as the shining sun at noontime. Each and every one of the Democratic candidates represent a quantum leap forward for America, should any of them attain that high office. Each and every one of them can be pressured, cajoled, even attacked by the progressive community to act in a manner required by the people. No amount of pressure from the progressive community has moved the Bush administration one inch away from its extremist agenda to date, and no amount of pressure will move them should Bush win the 2004 election.

Is John Kerry the one you’ve been waiting for? Is John Edwards? Howard Dean? Dennis Kucinich? Al Sharpton? Were any of the candidates who have dropped out the one you’ve been waiting for? The answer to those questions will vary from person to person. At the end of the day, however, the final answer is no.

No, none of these candidates are the one you’ve been waiting for.

The one you’ve been waiting for has always been here. The one you’ve been waiting for pressured these candidates to fight the onslaught of the Bush administration. The one you’ve been waiting for took to the streets before the Iraq invasion, worked for the campaign which most inspired, agitated against the PATRIOT Act, spoke to friend and neighbor and family about what has gone wrong.

This final truth is self-evident. You are the one you’ve been waiting for. You drive the agenda. You make or break this political season. You are the hero. You’ve been here the whole time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. All power to the people
like it says in The Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hear Hear, Mr. Pitt!
Every word the truth, Sir!

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Me?
For a second I thought it might be Ralph Nader. Whew. Good read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. It is so good...
to have you back. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhite5 Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wonderful!! Brilliant!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you, Will Pitt.
So proud to know you through DU and TruthOut. Your words are always an inspiration. Once again, Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Easy to Hide
As I've said before, you really need to get off this "Hide that" kick. Hiding a million pounds of practically anything in a country the size of Iaq is a piece of cake. Hiding something that hundreds of inspectors have been looking for is a completely different matter. Perhaps I'm nitpicking, but the notion that the amount of WMD material that the adminstration claimed existed is too somehow too big to hide easily is simply not true. Give me a day and a decent backhoe and I'll bury that much stuff anywhere you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Very good point.
I think Rummy recently said that you could hide alot of that stuff in a hole as small as the one the found Saddam in. What's the answer to that, Will?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. UNSCOM, UNMOVIC, David Kay, the CIA, 135,000 troops and 11 months
Edited on Wed Feb-18-04 02:11 PM by WilliamPitt
are all implicit in the 'Hide that' comment. Sure, you can hide something if no one is looking for it. But trying to hide a million pounds of anything with UN inspection teams, Bush inspection teams, the CIA and the US military looking for it is a whole different kettle of fish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Ok, but you beg the question.
It took months to find Saddam. Granted, he was moving around but how do you answer Rummy's assertion that this stuff is small enough to be hidden very well. That's what I took from his clever comment...that you could practically hide this stuff in a flour sack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. A million pounds is a million pounds.
30,000 munitions are 30,000 munitions. Flour sacks won't cut the mustard, to make a bad pun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Ok, I getcha but
while I'm thinking about this, Rummy is really the guy to go after and neutralize, isn't he? He seems to be unflappable and always quick with the glib answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamondsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. It would have to be a dual effort-
Rummy and Cheney. Both are pulling some strings, imho and both have the quick answers, sounding honest enough to snow the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Volume versus Weight
Yes, a million pounds is a million pounds.

However, its clear that you are missing the point. Citing the weight of the items in question tells you absolutely nothing about how much volume is required to contain the materials in question. More importantly, it tells you absolutely nothing about how difficult it would be to hide said materials.


For example, let's calculate how much space a million pounds of uranium takes up:

1000000 Pounds = 453592 Kilograms

or 23873263 cubic centimeters (density of Uranium 19g/cc)

or 843 cubic ft

or a cube 18ft x 7ft x 7ft

or the space of a large pickup truck


Now I admit that I delibrately chose uranium because its very dense and makes a very compelling demonstration about how a million pound can actually take up very little space. If we were talking about something the density of water rather than uranium, the resulting volume is about 20 times larger. Even so, does anybody here think it would be hard to hide 20 trucks in a country the size of Iraq?

The bottom line is this Will. If you want to convince me that it would be difficult to hide that amount of material you are going to have to convince me that a million pounds of nerve agents and bio-toxins actually takes up a lot of space. So far, I see no evidence that it does.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. There Are Some Elements You Are Leaving Out, Sir
There is a good deal more to this than cubic volume.

Biological agents require containment if they are not to spread, and controlled environment if they are to remain viable as weapons. This requires something more than a hole in the ground. It requires some specialized construction, and functioning electrical power. Someone must tend the latter.

A million pounds of gas and biological agents requires containing vessels for transport; these are sturdy, weighty and sizeable in themselves. The tank containing a compressed gas weighs far more than the gas within it. It would seem likely the containing vessels for biological agents would be in similar proportion.

Thirty thousand field artillery rounds, whether rocket propelled or shells, is a sizeable load of ordinance, perhaps a weeks ration for an infantry corps' artillery. This scale of munition is measured by freight cars. It does not disappear into a few small holes.

All of these things would require considerable administration to hide. There would be much transport and many persons involved. There would be records; there would be participants with memories. No records have been found, and despite lavish inducements, no participants with verifiable memories have stepped forward.

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Not to mention if infrared can spot pot plants in people's homes
Edited on Wed Feb-18-04 02:29 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
how can it not spot WMD's an a country the size of Iraq with hundreds of thousands of eyes and thousands of informants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Easy to hide, but to make it disappear?
Completely and totally? So that no one that can be found in months of exhaustive searching who even provides a clue that can be used to find any of it? or the facilities used to produce it? or evidence of procurement of supplies required? so that people who have made a career of finding this kind of stuff come up completely empty handed? That seems a little harder to imagine.

All it took was a couple of trailers used to produce hydrogen for weather baloons or some barrels of fertilizer to raise a ruckus about WMD being found. We haven't even heard those kinds of things for months.

That's the information I explode William's 'Hide that' to include.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. Agreed
As I said in my post, the reason we should doubt the administration on this issue is because so far they have found no trace of the materials, not because the materials would be particularly difficult to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Heeeeee's BACK!
Thanks, Will for your work for DK but gods it is good to have you back to writing for us all. Yup, we are the people and we will be heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. We The People.
Drive the agenda. We The People make or break this political season. I hope you're right, Will.

Another wonderful piece. Thank You for posting it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. We are the ones we have been waiting for.
Go DK! Taking it to the streets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. appealing to my inner "Bob"
I really like the way you appeal to the inner Lafollette in all of us to have confidence we CAN do what we say we WANT to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertha Venation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well said, Mr. Pitt.
Have you ever thought of publishing any of your writings? ;)

Proud to have made your acquaintance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
18. Thanks Will
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldian159 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wow
Splendid, Mr. Pitt. Splendid,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. How the heck do you do that.....
Man, I try to write things that moving, and they all come out like poop.

Keep up the good work, Will. Good to have you back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Practice
Thanks. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imalittleteapot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. Thanks Will.
You've once again stirred my emotions with your impressive words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
25. Feel the fury of John Kerry nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
26. That was really good WIll
I liked that. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. Hey, WIll, why are people saying "Welcome back"?

Have you left the Kucinich campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Look here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
33. Bravo
I have chills reading this! Very powerful. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC