Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Photo: Clinton greets Gore at Clinton Global Initative today. Oh, to be able to read Gore's face!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:17 PM
Original message
Photo: Clinton greets Gore at Clinton Global Initative today. Oh, to be able to read Gore's face!
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 06:19 PM by flpoljunkie

Former President Bill Clinton, right, greets his former Vice President Al Gore, before a panel discussion at the Clinton Global Initiative Annual Meeting, Wednesday, Sept. 26, 2007, in New York. (AP Photo/Jason DeCrow)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wouldn't mind reading Clinton's as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I know what Bill was thinking.
He was thinking that Gore road his coattails to the White House ... and then threw him overboard ... and lost as a result.

Gore is probably in denial about costing himself the Presidency.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. What cost Gore was the election machines and the GOP stole the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. I agree to a certain extent, however I believe the primary reason
the race was close enough for them to steal, was the endless corporate media slander and trashing of Al Gore's integrity and credibility. I believe the corporate media were motivated in large part because Al Gore championed the Internet while he was in Congress. They saw the Internet as a growing threat against their monopoly on information, information = money, power and influence, so they played Zeus to his Prometheus. The corporate media didn't want the primary political champion of the Internet in power. They were intent on attacking his credibility and integrity above all else, because they had been busy making integrity and credibility the central issue for the previous eight years with the Clinton Witch hunt prior to the selection of 2000, raise your hands if you ever saw Clinton hug Lewinsky more than fifty times. This is precisely why Bush ran on "restoring honor and integrity to the White House". Whenever Al Gore started to pull away, the corporate media went off on him again on some fabricated B.S. regarding his integrity, some of them even admit they just wanted to keep the race close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why, Gore was Clinton's VP and seemed very happy
at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrider767 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gore Might Be Thinking
"Thanks for nothing Pal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Welcome to DU, nightrider767!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Hey, it was Gore's decision not to use Clinton
in his campaign and to go with Lieberman for the "morality" vote. I think he would have been better off with Clinton, who was still extremely popular in many parts of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Exactly right!!!! Thank you for re-inserting the FACTS into this debate
You're absolutely right that it was Gore's decision to have Clinton sitting on the sidelines in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Unfortunately, it was Bill's decision to oversee the collapse of party infrastructure
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 06:32 PM by blm
after 1996 in states he decided were a waste of money.

But then, a secure election process overseen with diligence by the DNC working to counter the RNC tactics would have resulted in a huge win for Gore in some of those states like Florida and Ohio.

Or for Dems in 2002.

Or for Dems and Kerry in 2004.

So - when did Hillary2008 go operational?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. True. But remember...Clinton fatigue was widespread at that point.
The "Big Dawg" was fairly toxic in 2000 just like Chimpy will be this round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Clinton fatigue was a RW, MSM myth
If Bill could have run for a third term, GWB would not have come close enough to steal the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Exactly. It amazes me that some DUers so easily buy into the RW talking points
such as "Clinton fatigue."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #21
33. In 2000, Clinton's "likability" was at -55 to -60 and Bush 1 trounced him in hypothetical match ups
I hate to actually bring history into a discussion of the past, but it was only Clinton's job performance rating that was above 50% in 2000. Clinton's personal likability rating was -60 nationwide in 2000, and even a little lower in swing states. This is why Rove's publicly stated strategy in 2000 was to "link Gore to Clinton". (Even in 2004, the Kerry campaign had trouble figuring out how use Bill Clinton in a way that gained more votes than it lost.)

F.Y.I. here are some actual polls from 2000...

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/08/06/cnn.time.poll/index.html

CNN/USA TODAY/GALLUP POLL
August 4-5
Favorable Ratings
Former President Bush 73%
Hillary Clinton 45
Bill Clinton 42

Sampling error: +/-3% pts


CNN/USA TODAY/GALLUP POLL
August 4-5
Whose Opinions Do You Respect More?
Former President Bush 61%
Bill Clinton 34

Sampling error: +/-3% pts


CNN/USA TODAY/GALLUP POLL
August 4-5
Who Would You Vote For?
Former President Bush 53%
Bill Clinton 42

Sampling error: +/-3% pts


http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/08/13/cnn.poll/

CNN/USA TODAY/GALLUP POLL
August 11-12

Does Vice President Al Gore's ties with President Bill Clinton make you feel more favorably toward Gore or less favorably toward Gore, or do they have no effect on your view of him?

More favorable 7%
Less favorable 32
No effect 60

Sampling error: +/-3% pts

CNN/USA TODAY/GALLUP POLL
August 11-12

If the Democratic nomination for president were still being decided and if Bill Clinton could run again, would you rather see the Democrats nominate Al Gore or Bill Clinton for president?

Gore Clinton
Democrats 48% 46%
Independents 52 29
Republicans 58 12

Sampling error: +/-6% pts


http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/08/11/cnn.poll/index.html

CNN/TIME POLL
August 9-10
Is Gore too close to President Clinton?

Now 1999
Yes 49% 55%
No 45 37

Sampling error: +/-3% pts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Clinton fatigue?
Give me a break!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Exactly
again. Clinton could have helped him carry Arkansas and Tennessee, his home state. Then FLA would not have been an issue.

Distancing himself from Clinton and choosing Liebermann were huge mistakes. Jeffrey Toobin's book Too Close to Call is excellent on this and other issues of the failed Gore campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. You conveniently forget that Gore did win the election in 2000.
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 06:29 PM by flpoljunkie
How many times did Bush say he was going to restore "honor and dignity" to the White House. What do you think that was about?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I didn't conveniently forget anything,
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 07:14 PM by seasonedblue
and I also didn't forget that in 2000 the party effectively abandoned the Clintons. I've never heard any bitterness about that from either one of them, and I certainly don't wonder why Bill kept a low profile through the 2004 campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I wonder how much to do Shrum had with Gore's decision on VP choice and Clinton
Ole 0 for 8 Shrum was the consignment beltway insider. Of course, he was only 0 for 6 when Gore choose him. And, it had to be the candidates. It couldn't have been Shrum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. I wouldn't be surprised if Shrum played a big part
in Gore's decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrider767 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
31. Well I'd have to say
I concede that you make an excellent point and in fact are more accurate than I. I'm just going on a personal feeling. I can't back it up. But even though what you're saying may be correct, I just got a bad feel for the whole affair. It was something in Bill's manner, something in the way he performed interviews about the election...

I got the impression that he couldn't care less if Al won or not.

Even now,,, for all the time they spent in office together, seems like they got no working relationship.

My 2 cents worth... Just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. I think Gore is saying, I've made a movie, been a big hit on the
lecture circuit, received an Emmy and hopefully, the Nobel Prize....what have you been up to other than campaigning?

I saw Gore on tv today...can't remember why or who was interviewing him...Woofie maybe...he was asked who he's going to endorse and he said he didn't know and that he might not endorse...at least that's how I took it. I am a never die Gore supporter....It was Woofie...I just remembered because I thought Wolf would ask if he (Gore) was going to enter the race....I think Gore thought he'd be asked too...I just have this wonderful feeling, looking at Gore today, that he might still run!!!!!!! Oh, be still my heart. Tomorrow I'm writing Gore another letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Bill has been doing plenty to help people around the world


Check out mycommitment.org


I find it hard to believe you don't know about his Global Initiative Foundation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Hey.....I know about this Global Initiative Foundation! But who
has been the bigger, of the two, headliner on climate change? I think Gore wins that hands down.I think you took me too seriously....I'm just a big Al Gore fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lol, that's great! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's thinking "No Bill, I am going to take my time to decide who to endorse"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think that if Gore had focused on all the good things
Clinton and he had done, if he has associated himself with Clinton he would have gotten more votes and he would have been able to get more electoral votes and won. They wouldn't have been able to steal it in Florida.

I really think he screwed himself some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. They're grown-ups..
I'm sure they can put their differences aside for the good of our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yep, where would Al be today without Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Or where would Bill be without Al?
Al was doing quite nicely when Bill chose him as his VP running mate. I believe this to be the turn of events that influenced Perot to drop out of the race temporarily, hurting his ultimate chances and increasing the success of Clinton/Gore coming to power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. I respectfully suggest that the Clinton owes a great deal to Gore
In the middle of the 1992 Presidential campaign, Jennifer Flowers publicly charged Bill Clinton with having a 12 year affair with her. The accusation and the media frenzy nearly derailed his campaign. One of the reasons Gore was asked to be Clinton's running mate was because Gore was devoted to his wife and children - - and the public knew it.

Additionally, Bill Clinton's experience was limited to being the Governor of a small, landlocked state. Bush Sr. was making the most of the "experience" meme. Al Gore brought a great deal of international and defense experience to the ticket. (Gore was an internationally recognized expert in nuclear disarmament, for example.)

Before Cheney stole his way into office, Gore was acknowledged to have been the most powerful Vice President in history. Clinton left Gore in charge of many aspects of their administration - - technology, REGO (reducing Government bureau racy), etc. Many of the things that worked in the Clinton administration were Gore's ideas, or Gore administered them.

What Clinton really owes Gore for, IMNSHO, is for Gore's character during the impeachment. If Gore had been driven by his own ego, he could have used the impeachment as a way to gain the Oval Office for himself and (potentially) be President for 10 rather than 8 years. He could have worked behind the scenes with the Republicans to make sure that Clinton was impeached - - and that Gore was running as an incumbent President in 2000. Or he could have publicly called for Clinton's impeachment and gotten the adoration of the press. Instead, he stood by Clinton and called him a great President.

IMNSHO, the fans/supporters of Bill Clinton should be grateful to Gore, and treat him with respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. Holy SHIT!!!
My god .... what could this mean????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Nothing.
They are probably happy to see each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. Best answer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
35. "I know something you don't know" (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC