The Democratic leadership in Congress is set to pass a host of domestic funding bills that would exceed Bush’s request by $22 billion. The extra funding would go towards veterans health care, infrastructure improvements, education, and other domestic priorities.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/17/AR2007091701569.htmlSpeaking to business leaders at a White House event this morning,
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/24/washington/24spend.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1190730711-mJAYSk/arTUQ0RpfhpOmFw Bush railed against the relatively modest increase in spending, arguing that $22 billion is "a lot of money":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CezPD9ZcqCUBush warned that spending increases, which could add up to over $200 billion over five years, would be "taking money out of the pockets" of Americans who need to "pay their mortgages or pay for their children going to college." Unfortunately, Bush failed to appreciate the irony in his remarks.
From The LA Times:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-na-warcosts22sep22,0,234891.story?coll=la-home-center September 22, 2007
WASHINGTON -- After smothering efforts by war critics in Congress to drastically cut U.S. troop levels in Iraq, President Bush plans to ask lawmakers next week to approve another massive spending measure -- totaling nearly $200 billion -- to fund the war through next year, Pentagon officials said.
If Bush's spending request is approved, 2008 will be the most expensive year of the Iraq war.
Digg it!
http://digg.com/politics/Bush_Can_t_Spend_22_Billion_On_U_S_But_We_Need_200_Billion_For_Iraq_War