I must say, Hillary has been quite impressive this morning. I'm more convinced than ever that...

[jefferson_dem]

she could make a suitable vice presidential candidate for Obama.

[babylonsister]

1. Ha! I can't even see that; they don't seem to like each other much. nt

[rodeodance]

10. cute

[patrice]

2. I'm hoping it's Obama:Kucinich. nt

[wildhorses]

3. is meet the press planning to give eqaul time to all the other

candidates?

[snappyturtle]

4. One does have to wonder. I've had enough of Hilliary this a.m.

Interesting she was on so-o much on one Sunday.

[wildhorses]

8. it is weird. a real disconnect for me. i wish they were all given

that kind of time. seems only fair to me.

[journalist3072]

11. Uh...hello. You might want to educate yourself first before asking such a question. In case you

are not aware, Meet The Press is in the midst of a "Meet the Candidate" series. They have already had some of the Presidential candidates on, and they are going to continue to do so.

Why are you and others here on DU acting like it's something out of the ordinary for a Presidential candidate to be on the talking heads shows?

It's very disingenuous, at best, to act as though the MSM has endorsed Clinton and is not giving equal time to other candidates.

Again, Meet the Press is in the midst of a "Meet the Candidate" series....All you have to do is suscribe to their email alerts, and you will be alerted every week as to who they are having on their program each Sunday.

[wildhorses]

16. thanks for the info

no need to be so snippy about it. ~in peace~ wh

[journalist3072]

20. Didn't mean to be snippy...but we went through this very same subject here on DU last night

With people expressing some level of outrage that Sen. Clinton would be on the Sunday talking heads shows....as if it's something out of the ordinary...as if no other candidate has ever appeared on one of these Sunday shows.

And I'm sorry, but the outrage by some DUers just seems to be phony and disingenuous, especially when many of them already KNOW that other candidates have been on these shows.

I don't see any outrage when other candidates (i.e. Joe Biden and Barack Obama) appear on these shows.

Yet, when Sen. Clinton appears, all of a sudden there is a need to bring back the fairness doctrine?

I thought DUers prided themselves in living in the reality-based community?

[beaconess]

24. According to Media Matters, Joe Biden was second only to McCain in the amount

of airtime he got on the Sunday Morning talk shows. This was one of Clinton's first appearances on MTP.

[wildhorses]

25. well, i missed it last night.

sounds like a good thing i did. i try to stay informed. ~in peace~ wh

[hisownpetard]

18. Uh, hello yourself....... I'm so sorry your mother burned your copy of "How to

Make Friends and Influence People" before you had a chance to read it!!!!!

[beaconess]

23. Um - yes

Today was the fifth in a series of MTP's "Meet the Candidates" series. They've already featured Biden, Edwards, McCain and Richardson and they plan to do the same thing with all of the candidates.

Tim Russert said this at the beginning of the show.

This is not some nefarious conspiracy to push Clinton . . .

[wildhorses]

26. again thanks. question has already been answered with just

the right amount snark applied. but, thanks for piling on. ~in peace~wh

[durrrty libby]

5. It will be Hillary and not any other candidate.

[liberal renegade]

6. I think you've got that backwards......

[msongs]

7. yes but will Oprah and her multimillionaire friends allow it? nt

[rodeodance]

12. um.. but, yes, she will be a major factor to consider in this race.

[kstewart33]

9. I wish you were right, but...

Hil's got the momentum, and Obama's stalled.

[clixtox]

14. MSM talking points...

Is it momentum or money HRC has?

Thanks for filling the void!

Believing the so-called "polls" is similar to believing in Santa or the Easter Bunny.

Unless the "Poll" is placed in context, the exact questions that were asked are revealed and the supposed respondents are somehow chosen randomly, "polls" are only propaganda and generally created and publicized only to be misleading.

Interesting post in another thread yesterday from someone asked in a current poll about who was their favorite Democratic candidate for the 2008 presidential nomination. The choices offered were only the corporate approved candidates, Kucinich wasn't even a possible response.

Not surprisingly Kucinich doesn't do very well...

[rodeodance]

13. "It is a MORAl imperative" that we provide health care-playing on AA right now (Hil).

[Colobo]

15. LOL! I agree. She could be an excellent asset in an Obama administration.

[TeamJordan23]

17. Her answers about leadup to Iraq War are still stupid; we all knew Bush was going to war. nm

[jefferson_dem]

22. Yeah...

That tends to be her weakest line of answers. She tries to duck, bob, and weave through a response...with all that "if I knew then what I know now" blather. Very little accountability there.

I'm wondering if people care about her war-mongering in the lead-up. Some here at DU surely don't.

[Adelante]

19. Heh

:D

[calteacherguy]

21. I was quite impressed as well. She'll be a great President. nt