Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU on Larry Craig: Gov't must show beyond doubt that "sex was to occur in public"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:24 PM
Original message
ACLU on Larry Craig: Gov't must show beyond doubt that "sex was to occur in public"
ACLU comes to Craig's defense
By Erika Bolstad | McClatchy Newspapers

Posted on Monday, September 17, 2007



http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/19801.html

WASHINGTON — The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a friend-of-the court brief on behalf of Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, saying Minneapolis airport police violated his Constitutional right of free speech in charging him with disorderly conduct after arresting him in an airport men's room.

The ACLU filed its brief in the same Minnesota court where Craig is hoping to withdraw a guilty plea in connection with soliciting sex from an undercover police officer in the men's room of the Minneapolis airport. The Idaho conservative, who rarely counts the civil liberties group as an ally, is scheduled to appear in court on Sept. 26.

In its brief, the ACLU argues that the government can arrest people for soliciting public sex only if it can show beyond doubt that the sex was to occur in public. The ACLU argues that solicitation for sex in a private place is protected speech under the First Amendment, no matter where the solicitation occurs.

The sting operation used by Minneapolis airport police was unconstitutional and was so broad that innocent people could be caught up in it, said Anthony Romero, executive director of the ACLU. "It is not a crime to solicit sex that would occur in private," Romero said. "It is a crime to solicit sex that would occur in a public place. What the state failed to show was that Senator Craig clearly expected to have sex in public."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheUniverse Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. The right wing hates the ACLU
Until the ACLU fights for their constitutional rights. They just dont want them to fight for left wing groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. did Rush Limbooooo ever thank the ACLU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why would they need to prove that when he has already plead guilty?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. cause now he has filed court papers wanting the case reversed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. That rarely happens
And usually only if the client was mentally incapacitated or had a very bad lawyer.

Filing papers does not in any way guarantee a new trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. But Solicitation is a crime itself
It is not necessary that the person actually commit the crime, nor is it necessary that the person solicited be willing or able to commit the crime (such as if the "solicitee" were an undercover police officer).


MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.324 Subd. 2 SOLICITATION OR ACCEPTANCE OF SOLICITATTION TO ENGAGE IN PROSTITUTION; PENALTY.

Whoever solicits or accepts a solicitation to engage for hire in sexual penetration or sexual contact while in a public place may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or payment of a fine of not more than $3,000 or both.


This is the statute, and no where does it say this "only if it can show beyond doubt that the sex was to occur in public". It clearly states that engagement for hire is the standard, not the actual sex act itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The original charge was lewd contact
was "solicitation for hire" ever an issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Solicitation "for hire" is prostitution
The airport cops themselves were soliciting sex in a public place, but they were not asking for money.

They were placing ads online at sites such as Craigslist & m4m. In those ads they were posing as sexy young men "stuck in airport" looking for "fun at airport." The intent of these ads was to lure other willing participants to that men's room for sex. It worked. They made some 41 arrests.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you ACLU ...
for trying to destroy two equal but opposite perverts with the same stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okoboji Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. question ......
"What the state failed to show was that Senator Craig clearly expected to have sex in public."


Where else was Craig going to have sex? When the police was questioning him, wasn't Craig worried about missing his plane? Are there private areas in Airports where somebody can have sex while waiting for their plane?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. So is a toilet stall public or private?
I guess it's public, but an argument could be made that it's private.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. I love it when the ACLU defends GOP reprobates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Controversial

That is the ACLU. But they protect EVERYBODY'S rights to a fair trial, etc...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. EWWWWWWWWWW.....in a public toilet......Ewwwwwww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC