Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seven Oil Wars to Control Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 12:26 PM
Original message
Seven Oil Wars to Control Iraq
I found a fascinating article about the many oil wars in Iraq and how all of this is nothing new. In Oil Companies in Iraq: A Century of Rivalry and War, By James A. Paul, this list really boils it down, no pun intended.


Seven Oil Wars to Control Iraq

Before coming to the Iraq war of 2003, we will review the modern history of conflicts over Iraq. There have been a total of seven wars in the past ninety years, all closely related to oil. What follows is a thumbnail sketch of those conflicts, to suggest the constant military struggle over this oil-rich territory.

1. Colonial Conquest (1914-18). The first conflict took place during World War I, when the British captured the area from the Ottoman Empire during a bloody four-year campaign. Lord Curzon, a member of the War cabinet who became Foreign Minister immediately after the war, famously stated that the influence of oil over British policy in Iraq was “nil.” “Oil,” said Curzon, “had not the remotest connection with my attitude over Mosul,” the major city in Iraq’s northern oil-bearing region.27 Studies by a number of historians have shown that Curzon was lying and that oil was indeed the major factor shaping British policy towards Iraq.28 Sir Maurice Hankey, Secretary of the War Cabinet, even insisted enthusiastically in a private cabinet letter that oil was a “first class war aim.”29 London had ordered its forces to continue fighting after the Mudros Armistice was signed, so as to gain control of Iraq’s main oil-producing region. Fifteen days later, the British army seized Mosul, capital of the oil region, blocking the aspirations of the French, to whom the area had been promised earlier in the secret Sykes-Picot agreement.30

2. War of Pacification (1918-1930). To defend its oil interests, Britain fought a long war of pacification in Iraq, lasting from 1918 throughout the next decade. The British crushed a country-wide insurrection in 1920 and continued to strike at insurgents with poison gas, airplanes, incendiary bombs, and mobile armored cars, using an occupation force drawn largely from the Indian Army. This carnage killed or wounded thousands of Iraqis, burning villages and extracting colonial taxes by brutal means. Winston Churchill, as Colonial Secretary, saw the defense of Iraq’s lucrative oil deposits as a test of modern weaponry and military-colonial use of force, enabling Britain to hold the oil fields at the lowest possible cost.31

3. Re-Occupation (1941). Though Britain granted nominal independence to Iraq in 1932, it maintained a sizeable military force and a large air base in the country and continued to rule “indirectly.” In 1941, fearful that Iraq might fall into the hands of the Axis, London again decided to seize direct control of the country through military force. Broad geo-strategic wartime goals drove this campaign, but not least was British concern to protect the Iraqi oil fields and keep them in British hands, free not only from German but also from US challenge.32

4. Iran-Iraq War (1980-88). In 1980, Iraq attacked its neighbor, Iran. A long war ensued through 1988, a savage conflict causing hundreds of thousands of casualties on both sides, costing tens of billions of dollars and destroying much of both countries’ oilfields and vital infrastructure. Foreign governments, interested in gaining geo-strategic advantage over both nations’ oil resources, promoted, encouraged and sustained the war, some arming both sides. The US and the UK supplied Iraq with arms, chemical and biological weapon precursors, military training, satellite targeting and naval support. Other powers participated as well, notably France, Germany and Russia.33 The big oil companies profited mightily, as war conditions kept Iraqi and Iranian oil off the market, driving worldwide prices substantially higher. By bankrupting the two governments and ruining their oil infrastructure, the war also potentially opened the way for the return of the companies through privatization in the not-too-distant future. But after the war, when Iraq and Iran turned to Japanese oil companies for new private investments, including a Japanese role in Iraq’s super-giant Majnoun field, the stage was set for yet another conflict.

5. Gulf War (1991). Following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August 1990, the US decided to intervene militarily and Washington assembled a number of secondary military partners, including the UK and France. As US President George Bush summed up the oil-centered threat posed by Saddam Hussein at the time: “Our jobs, our way of life, our own freedom and the freedom of friendly countries around the world would all suffer if control of the world’s great oil reserves fell into the hands of Saddam Hussein.”34 US forces heavily bombed Iraqi cities and military installations and then launched a short and decisive ground war, ending the Iraqi occupation of its neighbor. The war badly battered Iraq, destroying much of its electricity and water purification systems and claiming 50-100,000 casualties.

6. Low Intensity Conflict During the Sanction Period (1991-2003). After the armistice, the UN’s pre-war embargo continued, because the US-UK used their Security Council vetoes to block its lifting. The sanctions imposed a choke-hold on Iraq’s economy, restricted oil sales and kept the country’s oil industry in a shambles. By blocking foreign investment and preventing reconstruction, the sanctions further ruined the country’s economic base. At the same time, with Iraqi supplies largely off the market, international oil prices were supported and company profits benefited. The US and the UK declared their goal to oust Saddam and their intelligence services made many efforts to assassinate him or to overthrow his government by military coup. The US-UK also established “no-fly” zones in much of Iraqi airspace, using air patrols to launch periodic attacks on Iraqi military targets. Four times, the US-UK launched major attacks, using scores of strike aircraft and cruise missiles – in January 1993, January 1996, June 1996 and December 1998. Though oil companies from a number of other countries negotiated with the Iraqi government for production deals, none dared to challenge the sanctions (and the Anglo-American companies) by beginning production under such risky circumstances.

7. Iraq War (2003). This war, launched by the US in spite of strong opposition at the UN, overthrew the government of Saddam Hussein and brought the US-UK coalition into direct rule over Iraq and in direct control of the oil fields. The war caused further deterioration of Iraq’s infrastructure, many casualties, and a chaotic and dysfunctional economy. Though the coalition rules Iraq, it has faced a tough armed resistance during many months following the main conflict. War number eight, the coalition’s war of pacification, has already begun.

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2003/2003companiesiniraq.htm



The next phase is related to here:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0208-11.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hestia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. And there is more to the story...
The whole idea of England going in was that Iraq would pump NO oil at any time. Saddam was 'allowed' by OPEC (read the Saudi's) to only pump 2 billion barrels, rather than the full amount. Iraq has more oil reserves than Saudia Arabia and they ain't giving up control of the money. They weren't going to allow a 3rd world dictator - Saddam - allow the price of oil fluctuate wildly, which is what happened when Saddam would annouce a pull back in pumping - oil would rise; he would put the pumps full blast - price of oil would fall. He was taking control of pricing out the hands of OPEC, and GWI was pay back.

There really aren't any deep wells in Iraq (Saddam wasn't allowed to drill them), which is why the headline last talk about how much money it would take to get Iraq's oil online. This too was on purpose. This war is about oil - keeping Iraqi oil off the market.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Add that Saddam wanted the oil price to be in euros
At that point, Britain (and BP) said that he had "become tiresome"...

As Palast has indicated, too much oil on the market is a bad thing. The key is to control the oil spigot as well as the oil.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's amazing how a succinctly written chronology can enlighten.
Edited on Sun Sep-16-07 02:22 PM by higher class
There can be no doubt that France will ever be an agent of peace for Iraq. The U.S. - France partnerships are amazing to behold - lifting up Aristede by the collar and kicking him to Africa - duly elected doesn't count. Congrats France.

It appears obvious that an agreement was made at some point in time to let the U.S. be the world police on behalf of the U.S. and Western Europe.

None of those countries are going to be a peace leaders, either.

Forget the U.K. - they are still colonialists and showed us how to do it - assuming that our experience was too little and too long ago.

I'm still bitter.

We are all victims of leaders fighting leaders for profits and control. All based on the premise that the people in the rest of the world are worthless.

In direct contradiction to the propaganda taught all of us from our youngest years.

It's up to us to aspire to and take back and make the propaganda true. Our votes count. Trial by jury. Separaton of church and state. Peace on earth.

To all the Iraqi people and our misled citizens. I'm sorry for our leaders who work hard for their corporations.

Thank you for this post. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks for your great input n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Largo, Florida has it all figured out.... Picture
Edited on Sun Sep-16-07 02:59 PM by madfloridian
courtesy of Ybor City Stogie who keeps an eye on the right wing in Tampa Bay.

Seen in a car window:



http://www.yborcitystogie.blogspot.com/

That must be why I love Florida so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. k for education and understanding about who we are -the past is a window
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Iraq-Iran War plan to take oil off the market is the same tactic this time around
"The big oil companies profited mightily, as war conditions kept Iraqi and Iranian oil off the market, driving worldwide prices substantially higher."

Palast has a great article on it:
http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/61/20480


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC