Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Smear Works: Anyone Doubts That Drudge Smear Had Impact in WI

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:02 PM
Original message
Smear Works: Anyone Doubts That Drudge Smear Had Impact in WI
Maybe, It's only me. But don't know anyone who didn't hear about "the affair."

In my office people were openly saying Kerry is toast and asking me if Dean could make a comeback.

Yet none of the pundits are mentioning this. It's all about the mysterious power of Edwards, especially with Independents and Republicans.

I don't think much of Edwards. I think the whole deal is that non-Democrats are more willing to believe the slime and dump on Kerry.

Anyone think different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I highly doubt the Drudge smear had ANY effect on the outcome in WI
But I'll wait for "Newsman Matt Drudge" to post his thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I wouldn't be too sure that it had no effect.
Drudge gets 5 million hits a day. It's certainly possible that people saw the big story and didn't get the info on the "corrections". Obviously, we know the story was BS, but did the debunking of the rumor get a lot of press?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark0rama Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Smear works by suppressing voter turnout...
...and I'm not seeing much evidence of suppressed voter turnout here in Wis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. I think the Milwaukee and Madison newspapers had the effect
of the Des Moines Register in Iowa. It encouraged voters to take Edwards seriously, as he deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. And Why. Those Endorsement were in middle of scandal story. Do you believe
that newpaper guys weren't making the some of the same comments as on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. I wasn't there, so I don't know what they were saying privately.
But I know there was NO mention of it in either endorsement, and it was kept outside the mainstream media for a long time. Most WI voters do NOT go online like all of us do and read political news.

So I do not believe that the "smear" issue had much impact on WI voters. And it shouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodHelpUsAll2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. Is Wisconsin
An internet free zone? Do they have cell phones or any modern technology? How the statement can be made that an entire state does not go online or see political news amazes me. The do have electricity and television and all that kind of modern stuff. Geez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bornskeptic Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #38
56. How long doyou think it took for the media to contact the parents
and determine that the story was almost surely bogus? They just waited until they had Polier's statement to go public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Possible. And Wisconsin Is An OPEN PRIMARY
Newsflash... Republicans will vote for the weakest Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uconnyc Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You don't think there are any Repubs that actually don't like *
and are looking for an alternative?

I supported McCain in 2000, had nothing to do with me wanting to see * suffer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Republicans had an effect on the outcome.
....they want to see this race go on and see the Dems infighting
in hopes of weakening us.

Won't Happen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Only 10% of the electorate in this primary were Repubs...40% Indies, tho
So I would say that the Indie vote affected this primary much more than the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. No
The story never made it very far beyond the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And we have seen plenty of evidence to prove otherwise.
The story did indeed originate with Drudge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rasmodia Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. That's not what he said.
He said it came from the Democratic side and I believe it. I think we were inoculating Kerry against further more damaging claims. Now, at the next revelation he can say. "They've come up with allegations before which turned out to be false"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Matt Drudge is a hack.
Rush Limbaugh is a drug-addled loser.
And Clinton's penis figures into this somehow, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurikanDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. And Drudge no doubt got it from Rove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. he lied
surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spirochete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. an unnamed Democrat
of course...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. "He said he got it from a Democrat."
And you believe him? Figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurikanDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. And you accept the word of a known liar because?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rasmodia Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. It makes perfect sense that Kerry would have it put out
It's a brilliant inoculation strategy against more serious allegations of philandering that are certainly yet to come. Is this the first you've ever heard of such rumors about Kerry, because I've been hearing them for years. It's pretty well-known around Washington and Boston.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurikanDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. I've had my fill of unsubstantiated, unverifiable slime and
malicious bullshit for this week. But thanks for the offer.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. It's well known in Washington that Bush
is an idiot drunk who sucks his thumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. Funny,I live in the Boston area
and I've never heard these rumors before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masshole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. nor have I
ever heard "those" rumors either.
And the Kerry/Weld race was not exactly fought by the Marquis of Queensbury Rules either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rasmodia Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. You have to be involved in political circles.
Just living in Boston doesn't mean anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masshole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. ok, I'll be your Huckleberry
please PLEASE tell us how you are "involved in political circles"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rasmodia Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Certainly.
I have an acquaintance who once worked in the Senate offices of Mr. Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masshole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. some help here please
Does my having an actual friend who works for the MDP trump your "aquaintance" who once worked in Kerry's offices??

I always forget the rules...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rasmodia Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Apparently not...if your friend is in the dark on this non-secret.
Perhaps you friend is the janitor at the MDP offices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. GW Bush is the worst President in history
or so my political circle tells me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. I'm glad you said that because I am involved in political circles
in Texas. You do realize that Bush is known for being a dumbass, right? But us Texans voted for him anyways, well, because he's from Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. According to Randi Rhodes, it originall came from Lucianne Goldberg. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DjTj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Drudge report came out last week and Edwards had no traction...
...in the polls that were taken before the debate.

Edwards' bounce is from the newspapers and the debate performance, not from the Kerry smears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
48. Mo Rocco had to say it. Made joke about probable impact of smear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurikanDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. No. I think the only ones inclined to believe that tripe were people who
didn't like Kerry to begin with or WANTED it to be true because they thought it would prop up their candidate's chances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Edwards did so well because of Edwards. Not because of Drudge
Edited on Tue Feb-17-04 10:14 PM by NNN0LHI
You are right.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurikanDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Agreed
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'd like to see a POLL of awareness of the "issue"
If even 10% were aware it could have had an impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamrsilva Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think it had more to do with all the Repubs and Indies
voting in our primary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. But why were 70% of indis and repub want Edwards not Kerry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. we don't know till someone asks them.
My speculation is that a friend of mine is right when he says that liberals from the South (but not the North) are perceived as more conservative than they really are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
29. I disagree somewhat
Edited on Tue Feb-17-04 10:46 PM by WesDem
Decided on the candidate in the last three days:

Edwards
56

Kerry
21

It's at least possible, no?


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3762911


edit: added link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
32. I think the debate had more effect
I believe that Edwards' response to the question about his responsibility for the IWR vote had the biggest impact. People realize why they don't like Bush. It's because he is unwilling to accept any responsibility for his actions. People see the same flaw in Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tobius Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
44. Have to agree, forgot the obvious. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BGrier Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
37. MSNBC Reports Heavy Republican Turnout For Edwards
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4297574/

What's going on here? Can Republicans vote in the Democratic primary? What does it mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shanty Oilish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
46. The Clark endorsement of Kerry helped Edwards
IMO that did Kerry no good at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
49. I think Edwards's NAFTA opposition propelled him to almost a win.
That's why Edwards is my second choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. Satisfied w Bush, Conservative, Supported the War, Non-Union
Edited on Wed Feb-18-04 01:21 AM by Sensitivity
Does not sound that that is the anti-nafta vote to me. Check the
exit poll data.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3762911
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
51. Smear would not have been caried out if it was not sure to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
52. A large percentage of voters made up their minds within the last 3 days.
Reported on the "Imus" show Wednesday morning. There was no mention of the possible impact that the "intern" affair may have had on the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Rassmusen survey suggests that there was significant impact
day when rumor was circulating Kerry had major hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeaconBlues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
54. Funny
I haven't communicated with anyone beyond the internet who has heard of this "scandal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
55. Having done WI politics--it cost Kerry 6-8. WI is a coservative state
when it comes to "old fashioned" morals. I remember a State Senate candidate (pre-lewinsky, admittedly) who went from ten points up to a one point loss when it came out he had an affair, and a guy who had to drop out of consideration to run for a congressional seat because his potential primary opponent outed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
57. Susan Estrich said the smear had impact
She was on Faux tonite, so take it for what it's worth.

She said Dem voters panicked, & said they didn't want a rerun of Clinton.

I don't know whether this is true or not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
58. Word is there is more slime being spread on the net. Edwards in luck with
Rove in his corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
59. The only people I know who knew about this were libertarians and righties
...and even they weren't jumping to conclusions. If it had an effect, I don't think it was significant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. If you knew the rumor and were conservative, why would you risk embarasing
yourself by voting Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC