Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EXIT POLL: Edwards within 8 pts of Kerry in WI

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cbua34 Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:37 PM
Original message
EXIT POLL: Edwards within 8 pts of Kerry in WI
according to Drudge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jacobin wins powerball lottery
according to Drudge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timahoe Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. This isn't about Sludge's credibility
He's just reporting exit poll data.

The exit polls were wrong in NH, not Sludge. Remember when the media said it was too close to call?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. much as I'd like that to be true, our friendly Newsman
is not someone I have much faith in right now.

Though I do like his jaunty hat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a_random_joel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Moon made of green cheese!
Drudge told me so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. my dog can talk
and is a democratic operative
according to Drudge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. How is Kucinich doing? I need to know
I bet someone that he would get 15% my pride is on the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbua34 Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:41 PM
Original message
Kerry 41%, Edwards 33%, Dean 17%
was all they had listed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
50. Kerry had 52 to Edwards 26 on the Kerry blog.
and Dean was in teens... but some will believe Drudge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Blogs have their biases, Drudge has his. What was the source for the Kerry
blog number?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. No idea- some Kerry guru with inside contacts
but the lore there is that he has been very close in the past primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. The "lore"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. Here was the call on AZ:
Predicted:
Kerry 41%
Clark 25%
Dean 11%
Edwards 10%
Lieberman 9%
Sharpton 2%
Kucinich 2%

Actual:
Kerry 43%
Clark 27%
Dean 14%
Edwards 7%
Lieberman 7%
Kucinich 2%
Sharpton 0%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #60
69. Why no link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. go to Ted at 2:32 PM (halfway down)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #57
66. Latest from Kerry blog:
Kerry 51%
Edwards 25%
Dean 15%
Kucinich 7%
Sharpton 2%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Edwards is the best man for President
according to Drudge

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. How does being a personal injury attorney for the majority
of one's life prepare them to lead this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. It seemed to work to take down the Helms machine and eject the corporat-
ocracy from the offices of the senior senator from NC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Dunno, by my point wasn't slighting Edwards
it's the use by an apparent Edwards supporter of Drudge a the source for "news" that puts Edwards close to Kerry...

I'm not enamored with Edwards, but as far as I'm concerned he fits in my ABB candidates - the Fab Four in my sig (depicted in alpha order)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. So what exactly is it that you have against trial lawyers?
This is a continuing mantra in your posts. What's up with that? Please be specific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
56. How is the poster "anti-lawyer" just becuase he/she doesn't..
think a personal injury lawyer is sufficiently prepared to be the lawyer. Your argument is the same as bush saying questioning his NG service is attacking the national guard. Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. that's not a fair analogy
Edited on Tue Feb-17-04 05:08 PM by spooky3
Edwards is an outstanding attorney with a remarkable record of success that he built from the ground up. The person raising the question is trying to figure out why that does not count as experience that would be valuable for a presidential candidate to have, and in fact seems to be something the earlier poster believes is somehow trivial or shameful.

In contrast Bush was NOT an outstanding member of the National Guard.

The parallel would be if the poster said Edwards was an incompetent attorney and therefore not admirable, and had evidence to support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #56
74. You might want to check out other posts by this person
before jumping into the fray. This is just a continuation of lawyer bashing, particularly by this poster. Fell free to jump in if you choose, but you should be armed with some facts before reacting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
51. If Edwards is not qualified, why was Lincoln?
FYI, nearly all of our greatest Presidents were lawyers. In fact, Lincoln's only experience prior to taking over the reigns of the country in 1860 was the practice of law, a term in the Illinois legislature (at a time when state legislatures did very little work), and a failed Senate campaign. If presidential candidate Edwards is not qualified, why was presidential candidate Lincoln?

I do not appreciate the anti-lawyer snipes I've seen you post throughout this site. Such vitriol to a traditional Democratic constituency would be better suited on a more right-leaning website.

Just for the sake of argument, let's turn your question around... What makes Kerry qualified to run this country? What executive positions has he held? What has he ever led? Or what about Dean? He's only been a Governor of one of the smallest states in the Union, with one of the smallest Gross State Products. Or Dennis Kucinich? Does anyone think his tenure as a Mayor or as a member of the House of Representatives is enough?

I think it goes without saying that nothing any candidate has done provides experience that translates to the Presidency. But that doesn't mean they wouldn't do a great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #51
63. well put. And, * has the most relevant experience.
3 years as pResident. Is he the most qualified candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
55. That's what I want to know. Sure he speaks pretty...
As a personal injury attorney he is trained and expert at flowery and persuasive prose. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. are you suggesting that all it takes to convince judges and
juries is flowery speech?

That is not what studies show.

And if that's all it took, there would be hell of a lot more rich lawyers around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #59
68. But there are eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. EDWARDS CAUGHT IN ALIEN LOVE TRIANGLE WITH DEAN AND KERRY . . .
DEVELOPING. . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chocolateeater Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
42. LOL, was Batboy there? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disenfranchised Donating Member (242 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's now 11 points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. A-Rod to the Red Sox...
...according to Dredge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Matt Drudge has no credibility
Drudge also said Dean was w/in the margin of error in NH, and of course there is the recent Kerry-intern story. I wouldn't be quoting that jerk right now if I were you. There used to be a very serious professional code of conduct in the journalism community against the premature release of exit polls before the polls closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nader drives Corvair
according to Drudge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
72. Not a Hummer?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRClarkesq Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kerry: 42% Edwards: 31% Dean: 15%
Since when is 11 points "close".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
73. compared to 20, its unexpected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hmmm...
Drudge pushing Edwards-who'd a thunk it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Since when is reporting a number "pushing"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. They did it in 2000, they did it with the terminator, and they did it with
Kerry--until Clark was out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. These numbers are going to be confirmed in a couple hours.
He's not saying Edwards is winning either.

I still don't see how drudge headline is "helping" Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
46. Depends what you mean by "confirmed"
They've been pretty bad previously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. By 'confimed' I mean, we'll know who got how many votes and delegates
will be awarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
44. Oh, right, Drudge is only "reporting"
numbers without any confirmed source, sample size, MoE, internals, or retrospective accountability.

I do not know if he is pushing Edwards, but given that there is nothing stopping him from advancing any agenda, and Drudge is known for distorting and outright lying to push his agenda, it's not unreasonable to suspect that Drudge is pushing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. ...he's "reporting" that Kerry is winning.
Bottom line: we'll see the numbers soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Republican push for Edwards continues
which is why they are trying to force Dean from the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
53. Riiiight.....
The Republicans want to run against the man with the best chance of beating them and the one who would have the longest coattails of any of the candidates in the more moderate states.... That makes a lot of sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. DRUDGE Breaking News: New Hampshire Exit Poll: Kerry 36% Dean 31%!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robroy Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. Just in from Drudge...
the democrats are rumoured to be in collusion with OPEC to keep gas prices up, thus stalling economic recovery and further hindering Bush's chances for a second term. Heard it here first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Ugh. This is why real journalists don't report anything other than turnout
this early in the day.

I live in Wisconsin.
I haven't voted yet (I had to work at 7, and I work too far from my polling place to head there during lunch).

I probably won't vote until 6:30 at the earliest (vet appointment right after work). But I will vote. Polls close at 8.

I will be casting my vote for Howard Dean, even though I have been disappointed and hard on him for the last few weeks.

But there's a part of me who wonders if she shouldn't be voting for Edwards, to add to his momentum, because he's my No. 2 choice. (The understanding-how-voting-works-and-how-Drudge-sucks part of me will win, of course.) Early poll reporting just screws up the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. That's the idea. The media writes the story in advance.
Then you must do your part to make it come true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. How would you feel if the early exit polls revealed a Dean lead?
Would that be a problem?

The media, so far, has released early exit polls, and would have done it if Dean were winning all the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. I know. It sucks either way.
I think it's a good idea for the media to poll throughout the day, of course -- because you get different demographics at different times of the day.

But I think reporting on something midway through has the potential to mess with the results. Kind of a Heisenberg Principle corollary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. I would feel that the media sucks runny dog shit. Which they do.
It's not enough that they've been post-morteming Dean for the past week -- now they are reporting he lost at 8 AM and releasing exit polls designed to swing Dean votes to Edwards DURING the voting process.

Do you actually believe that the media's unconscionable actions aren't having a direct effect on this race? Note that I am asking you what you ACTUALLY BELIEVE -- not simply what you'd be inclined to debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
65. I have no dog in this race
And I think exit polls, especially sketchy Drudge-reported ones, suck. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. So if Drudge reports it it's true
Dream on:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. I didn't realize that Drudge was anti-Kerry before today!!!
Say it isn't so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
26. Drudge? Who cares? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
29. Like we can believe anything Drudge says. If it's true, that's great
I'm rooting for Edwards even though I'm voting for DK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
32. just a reminder, this is the face behind the lies....
Edited on Tue Feb-17-04 03:59 PM by wuushew


Applying standard Republican facial algorythms to his visage confirms the presence of pure evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
33. Consider the source....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shawmut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
35. don't forget his NH exit polls
Edited on Tue Feb-17-04 03:59 PM by slim
when he had a 4 point spread between Kerry and Dean and was way off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
37. The early exit polls in TN, had Clark at 15%
The early exit polls in TN, had Clark at 15%, he ended up around 23%,
so MOE is large
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
39. Don't give drudge any hits
:puke:

he's filth peddling site isn't worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
40. You mean those wonderfully reliable things
that have no source, no sample size, no MoE, no internals of any kind, and no retrospective follow up?

Oh, yeah, and they're from Drudge. Just thought I'm emphasize that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
41. "according to Drudge"?? Why not include "Drudge" in the thread title?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefta Dissenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
43. Margin of error
92% +/-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Heh
Correction: 92% +/- (9 out of every 10 times Drudge isn't reporting these numbers while snorting coke in his bathroom).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
61. 7. You may not post any material from extreme right-wing sources, specific
7. You may not post any material from extreme right-wing sources, specifically WorldNetDaily.com,
Newsmax.com, FreeRepublic.com, and their ilk. Material from more "mainstream" conservative writers or
sources, such as The Washington Times and Fox News, are permitted as long as the post includes a clear
warning about the source. (For example: "WARNING: Please note that this article is written by George
Will.")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. "material" is a bit of a stretch here
although Seinfeld has always had good "material". :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
64. So Drudge is OK now that it's bad news for Dean?
Gotcha! :)

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. I pointed that out earlier today, as well.
Ironic, isn't it? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
70. If it comes from the gospel Drudge, must be correct!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
75. ARG!
Can we please BAN the use of Drudge as a source? I mean, sheesh! Look at the damage done by the Kerry-intern rumor he pushed. (And I'm no fan of Kerry saying that.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC