Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards will build momentum over next week......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jmoss Donating Member (252 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 02:54 PM
Original message
Edwards will build momentum over next week......
I believ he will solidify himself as ONLY other viable candidate.

I cannot wait to see a debate b/t Edwards & Kerry (i.e., without Dean there), and hope for a repeat performance of Sunday from both candidates. It was about time JRE's gloves came off!!!
:-) :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree.
The media will continue pushing Edwards and bashing Kerry. And Karl Rove will be rubbing his hands with glee. We will have the one candidate who was stupid enough to vote for the war AND has no military experience or significant foreign policy credentials. I give up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yup, Media Will Do Everything Possible To Laud Edwards
It is so obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That study that everyone was citing yesterday showed that the media
is still giving short shrift to him (by volume of stories) and they refused in January to talk about Edwards's policies, personality, or to talk about him in general political discussions, which they do for Dean.

They talk only about him campaigning. His policies and his personality happen to be his two strongest suits, but the media studiously avoided talking about both in January.

See pp.19 &20.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disenfranchised Donating Member (242 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. What does military experience have to do with the war vote?
I'm not trying to be confrontational. I just don't get the connection.

Kerry had war experience (i.e. knew the horror of war 1st hand) and voted for the war.
Edwards had no war experience and voted for the war.
End result = 2 voted for the war.

Why is one vote any different from the other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'll be making as many phone calls for Kerry
as I did for Clark. Edwards does not have the foreign policy experience or the legislation experience. He has not proved that he can win the south. Edwards is a GOP dream come true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Rove will base his strategy on fear and terror, we will be bombarded
with photos of, and rhetoric about, the "war president". Iraq will be a disaster. I believe we need someone who has real pictures of himself during wartime, or at least someone who can say he wasn't gullible enough to fall for W's Iraq lies. Both would be great, but that guy is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. If we fight 2004 only on issue of war, Republicans will win. Democrats
need to talk about what matters in people's lives: middle class opportunity. Kerry has barely anything to say about that issue. Many voters will see little reason to get out to vote for the difference in two candidates who think national security is the only issue that matters in people's lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disenfranchised Donating Member (242 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Thanks for the explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think Edwards will do well here in Wisconsin.
On the local Milwaukee news after the debates there were a few swing voters interviewed that were thinking Kerry but decided to vote for Edwards. The local press seemed to be very kind and supportive of Edwards, didn't give Kerry much attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not to be offensive, but
wasn't that the story Edwards was trying to spin when he said, after his SC victory, that he was in a "two man"race with Kerry--and then came in third and fourth in the caucuses this weekend--after finishing 4th in AZ, NM, and ND, and 3rd in DE?

Edwards said that he would do better after Clark left and then he didn't. Isn't it possible he can only get the AAK vote and he has more or less reached the ceiling of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Although glad to see my "celing/floor" terminology catching on,
it looks like Edwards is going to have a big finish in WI today, and so I don't know how you can say he has found his ceiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I don't really think that's an original metaphor, AP
seems to me I have read it....oh....a couple thousand times before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Ah, that's just his trial lawyer coming out

Say 50 different things - then when one of them comes to fruition trumpet it with a firm "told ya!" and move on. :)

Oh, and yes, BTW, to the AAK vote theory - that is exactly what it is. Can you imagine a debate between the two?

John: You voted for the war.
John: You did too.
John: Well, I didn't want to.
John: Well, I didn't either.

Makes me giddy just thinkin' 'bout it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yup, the media would like a two-man "horserace"
Yup, the media would like a two-man "horserace". Sells better.
May the best man win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. The media would like Bush to win. They want everyone to drop out.
They want to label Edwards a VP candidate.

Also, if you don't have money to spend on them, they don't like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC