Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WaPo's Broder: Bloomberg And Hagel For 2008?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:48 PM
Original message
WaPo's Broder: Bloomberg And Hagel For 2008?
I thought Bloomberg had made a Sherman statement to Dan Rather? Was that a load of BS, or did either Hagel or Broder not get that message?

--snip--
Chuck Hagel, the senator from Nebraska, describes himself as a "tidal" politician, one who believes that larger forces in society shape careers more than the ambitions of individuals. "The only mistakes I've made," he told me last week, "were when I tried to go against the tide."

Today, that tide may be carrying him away from his Republican Party and toward a third-party or independent ticket with New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg -- a development that could reshape the dynamics of the 2008 presidential race.

Next month, Hagel will make a threshold decision -- whether to run for a third term in the Senate. He gave me no definitive answer, but my guess is that he will say that 12 years of battling the institutional lethargy of Capitol Hill will be enough. Certainly he is under no illusions about how much he can achieve as one of 100 lawmakers.

--snip--

Hagel said that he and Bloomberg have "had some talks" but that neither of them is ready at this moment to form a partnership or stake out a strategy. Like everyone else, Hagel understands that the mayor's personal wealth would permit him to organize a campaign, starting in the winter or spring, and still have time to gain ballot access in enough states to make him a credible national candidate. But wealth alone will not bring him within reach of 270 electoral votes, and Hagel shares the view that Bloomberg is not interested in being "a spoiler" whose only effect would be to hurt one of the major-party candidates.
--snip--

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/24/AR2007082402009.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Stupid post the man already said he's not running
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Uh, thanks--reread my first sentence. Apparently someone's not
telling the truth. I don't believe these guys for one second--I'll bet it's all a part of their will-they-or-won't-they strategy, and that everything they say is coordinated and calculated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. He wouldn't be the first to rule it out and then change his mind.
And depending on the Democratic nominee, he will make his decision.

There are 2 candidates who would keep him out. Gore and Clinton.

If he says he is absolutely not running, he might know something some others don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I don't think he ruled it out--Bloomberg said the same things he's
always been saying, but Dan Rather thought he was getting a scoop by reporting Bloomberg's same denials as definitive. I suspect he's still thinking of running, or he wouldn't send Hagel and Sam Nunn to talk him up to the media. I don't think he'll run if Obama is the nominee, but I think he will if it's Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. yet another lie from Broderella, King of the Press Whores
Really I want to know what fairy dust Broderella is snorting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Here's Broderella at his best!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:29 PM
Original message
LOL! Thanks for that! I don't think he has much credibility left anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. NO WAY HAGEL - A VOTE THIEF. A TRAITOR. No matter which
party he runs with. Another sorry creature for being a part of the plan to take our votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Poor Broder---He hjad better get over that
"Paradise Fantasy". He thinks we should all sit aroung
and sing CUM -BY -Ya. Politics is how problems are
solved. When there is much at stake it will take time
to fight it out. Broder has been disconnected so long
who pays attention to him anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Broder is an over-the-hill pompous pundit
that comes second to George Will in Beltway wisdom, what we in the middle of the country refer to as bullshit.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Well, to be fair to Broder, I don't think these were HIS views--
these were Hagel's. He was just reporting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. And look for David Broder's column next Sunday, "Potted Geraniums -- And Why
America Still Prefers Them for Patio Settings."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. and here's MORE of BRODERELLA in WANK-O VISION®
I can't stop laughing at this one because it is so true, shows the world that Broderella is forever trapped in the Land of the B-Holes because Broderella just does NOT have what it takes to be an A-Hole!

http://www.thepoorman.net/2006/09/29/keyboard-kommando-komix-presents-4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC