Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Karl Rove might help Hillary win the White House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:10 PM
Original message
How Karl Rove might help Hillary win the White House
A fascinating piece in the LA Times speculates on the reasons why Karl Rove has been attacking Hillary Clinton.

In a nutshell, it suggests that Rove has identified her as the weaker nominee and is building her up, egging Dems on to defend her as the man their enemy Rove fears.

Let's say this is true - the simpler explanation is that Rove was saying what he thinks - will it work?

A common mistake made by political strategists is to believe that tactics that worked when they were doing well will work equally well when things are going badly...

I think that in so far as Mr Rove succeeds this time in influencing the Dems choice it won't work as in 2004.

The Dems may rally against Rove as they did in 2004. But so, this time, may the voters. Voters may react like Dem activists, concluding that there must be something good about a woman that Karl Rove dislikes so much. The master strategist may just end up helping Hillary become President.

http://timesonline.typepad.com/comment/2007/08/a-fascinating-p.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think he's really afraid of her, but wants people to think he likes her, so he's
attacking her, knowing that people will think he's only attacking her to promote her, so they will turn against Clinton because they think Rove is supporting her. His mind is dizzying.

So are all these ideas. Rove is irrelevant to the majority of voters. Only us wonks are obsessed with what he thinks, the rest of America will take him at face value, as he knows. One of the number one rules of political strategy is to not outthink yourself. Which means he's attacking Clinton because he doesn't want her to win, and because he is trying to excite his own base, which also hates her. His base--whom he worries about for more than he worries about us--need to be excited so they will start donating to their loser squad of nominees, and that's all that's going on.

Rove isn't talking to us. He doesn't like us. We're nuancing this way too much. No respectable Dem will let Rove influence their decision one way or the other, I would hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think we should not pay attention to what Karl Rove says about Democrats.
And rely on doing our own research on the candidates, and who we think is best. For the record, I think it preposterous that Karl Rove affected who was chosen in '04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. I disagree
I'm sure Rove swung it by at least the winning 1%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think we sometimes think too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Think about it; Rove knows ALL Dems & most Independents despise him, so what does Rove have to
Edited on Mon Aug-20-07 02:45 PM by LaPera
gain this early from his daily attacks on Hillary....This is classic Rove manipulation, Rove is not stupid....he wants the attacks on Hillary to galvanize the Dems and Idies behind Hillary, this is the candidate the republicans want to face, a lot of baggage and a lot to exploit and a woman....The republicans won't stand a chance in hell if Hillary is not the Dem nominee....

All Rove cares about now is getting the weakest Dem candidate nominated....He knows his attacks on Hillary can ONLY help her, because Dems despise him so....ONLY registered Democrats can & will be voting in the primary for the democratic nominee.

So why does Rove attack Hillary to only Dem voters? Well, it's quite obvious who Rove & the republicans want to face....but it also serves two other purposes for Rove....

It keeps attention only on Hillary each & every day in the media and not on other more stronger democratic candidates desperately needing more media exposure.

Finally, it endears Rove to the republicans for attacking their made up villain, who they so much, Rove is their hero, getting their frustration out for them... Rove also becomes enduring to them, and they will stand behind him in his up coming criminal charges.

This another well thought out Rove plan, and so few Dems and Indies as usual, are seeing through it...The Dems, always three steps behind Rove and then it's too late!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. "ONLY registered Democrats can & will be voting in the primary for the democratic nominee."
In what Bizarro world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Tell me can republicans vote for a dem in a democratic primary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yes, there is no party registration required in many states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Not in California, Oregon or Washingtom....The Left Coast so Rove is ONLY playing to us Dems!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. in GA and many other states, you're not required to register for a party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Seems a bit backwards....
Edited on Mon Aug-20-07 03:13 PM by LaPera
A Democratic primary should be for democratic voters and vice versa as is in most states...as just witnessed in the Iowa straw poll.

And in the general election one can then vote for any candidate they choose.

What's the point of having a Democratic primary, if republicans can vote and chose in it?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. well, I don't know it it's in most states or not...but...
...I would never tell someone they couldn't vote for a Democrat just because they were registered as something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. But they already can, in the general election!
Edited on Mon Aug-20-07 03:30 PM by LaPera
That's the whole point of a primary, for people of that party to elect their party's candidate, to face other candidates who won their party's nomination...

For the general election where THEN people can vote for any candidate of any party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. not in all places
You're required to vote in the general the same way you voted in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let 'em pile on.
The Clintons thrive on that sort of derision. And the more they thrive, them more it pisses off the Republicans. That nastiness turns off much of America and in the end will serve to benefit her as a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Rove knows this so why do you think he's doing it...because he's stupid?
Edited on Mon Aug-20-07 03:03 PM by LaPera
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Rove's pathologic partisanship has long since trumped common sense.
I believe his inclination to destroy his targets has become instinctive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. But only Dems voters can decide on the nominee NO ONE else!
Edited on Mon Aug-20-07 03:01 PM by LaPera
So why is Rove playing to the Democrats who despise him? Why is he pushing Hillary, Rove KNOWS exactly what he's doing....Rove is methodical....your three steps behind if you believe Rove is doing this out emotion, that's NEVER been Karl Rove...its to manipulate....Again, only the Dems can nominate in the primaries who the Dem nominee will be....so he is obviously playing only to the Dems....this will long be forgotten in a long year plus in the general election...So he's playing to only the Dems...so who do you really think he wants to see the Dems nominate...again considering Rove is quite aware that every Dem hates him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. My advice: Ignore him.
Karl's vision of a Republican-dominated government is crumbling.

He ain't the boy genius he's cracked up to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
19. I think attacks on Clinton will backfire, no matter who's making them.
That goes for the general election only, I'm still hoping she won't get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC