Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

will we be paying for SS protection for Rove after 8/31?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:38 AM
Original message
will we be paying for SS protection for Rove after 8/31?
And who will make sure that he loses his security clearance? The guy has been allowed privileges to which he was not entitled. They shouldn't continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Congress should defund all taxpayer paid political consulting positions..
if the White House wants a political operative, the corresponding national committee should pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't believe he is eligible now for SS protection
Even when traveling with bu$h, the SS is there to protect bu$h not the aids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's what I thought, too
Why should he be getting it now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I believe he was getting protection at home
I'll see if I can find anything about it. It may have been privatized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Unless I've been sleeping through a law change, he's not entitled to SS protection.
Unless he runs for President and gets threats. OR he becomes the President-elect.

Once he's off the payroll, he doesn't necessarily lose clearance, but what he loses (or should lose) is ACCESS. The end result is the same thing.

But what's really happened is that he's gone from full-time to part-time. Bet he's on the phone a lot, and bet George goes to Crawford more than usual too, where Karl visits quietly....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. well, there's this story
"WASHINGTON, DC - Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), Chairman of the Environment & Public Works Committee, sent a letter today to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Mike Leavitt, asking for information regarding possible EPA grants awarded to an interest group - National People's Action - that recently picketed the personal residence of Presidential advisor Karl Rove. The protest occurred when he and his children were home and that U.S. Secret Service and D.C. Metropolitan Police were required to disperse the group from Mr. Rove's lawn.
"


http://www.nationalcenter.org/2004/04/epa-asked-to-supply-information-on.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's one thing to dispatch them as a consequence of one's work, it's another thing altogether to
give them protection after they leave office. And often, the protection while they are working isn't much more than stepped-up police presence and an SS (the Treasury Department guys, not the elites) escort to and from work or crowded venues. I remember when Donna Shalala (who dismissed her protection because she didn't like the guy breathing down her neck) got MUGGED at the ATM right across the street from the one in G-Town where that big murder happened...

But once they're done, they're done. He'll have to hire someone if he wants a detail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misskittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. When I first read this title, I thought of a different "SS" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. As of late, same difference.
The Secret Service has been acting like an arm of the Bush Crime Family. I'll grant them their duty to protect any president, even an unelected one.
But they have been strong-arming citizens exercising their rights under the Constitution. "First Amendment Zones," indeed. What disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC