Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WaPo: We wouldn't run it (Kerry-Polier rumor) if we had photos: BBC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:43 PM
Original message
WaPo: We wouldn't run it (Kerry-Polier rumor) if we had photos: BBC
The Washington Post London correspondent Glenn Frankel, a Pulitzer Prize winner and former editor of the Post's Sunday magazine, defended his newspaper's editorial judgment.

"We've been down this road many, many times before. We are extremely reluctant to follow this kind of thing up unless there is a really, really compelling public interest. We don't feel there is any reason to until it reaches a threshold.

"All we have at the moment is that the woman's parents, who are republicans, don't like Senator Kerry.

"In any case, nobody would be too shocked if Kerry lied about an affair. Even if someone came to us with photographs we still wouldn't run it. Lying to Don Imus is not a federal offence."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3493277.stm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. The article seems to say that "dirty tricks" before the election are okay,
but doesn't mention what happens after a President is in office, when the dirty tricks don't stop, as was the case with Clinton who got elected inspite of Jennifer Flowers, but then had Whitewater and Paula Jones come out after the election which precipitated the worst witch hunt of a President which imho, has ever occurred in American Politics.

Any of our Democratic candidates need to be very forthcoming about anything which could be used by the Repugs after the election, because with Clinton the "bar was lowered."

If Kerry is the nominee he needs to leak "ANYTHING" which might be fodder for some effort to bring him down once he is in office. It doesn't stop with an "Election" anymore. It will go on until you are brought down. If, you are a Democrat that is. Repugs are still "untouchable" until they've committed crimes in office that deserve impeachment, but somehow they are given a pass or are allowed to "bow out."

(yes...I know L. Johnson was an exception) but that's because he must have had a scrap of honor left that he bowed out given his failure in Viet Nam. But, then again, he was a Democrat, where a sense of conscience still exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BruinAlum Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. This rumor has been put to rest. the woman released a statement
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 05:24 PM by BruinAlum
Your story is before her statement. Drudge has changed his story too.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=342742
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. This story is about WaPo statement on adultery stories. Do you think that

there will be no more of them in this campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BruinAlum Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Not on this. This dog is dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. That's up to the Sun and Matt Drudge, not you or me

I think this particular dog's next race will focus on discrepancies between the original statements attributed to the parents and their statement today.

I don't have any predictions how aggressive either or both will want to get, but I would be very surprised if they just let it go.

Whatever Kerry or the girl did with who may be less important to both Drudge and Sun than the perception of their own credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BruinAlum Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Give me a break!
The woman denied the affair. The original stories were LIES! There were no original statements. There was no interview. She said she didn't know the people writing the stories.

The original sources were right wing shit sources known to lie. (Read: NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE) The woman's statement was reported by a mainstream news source. (Read: CREDIBLE) Included was a statement from her parents.

Drudge has already changed his story.

Your determination to exploit Drudge and Sun as Holy Scripture for the purpose of gaining an advantage for another candidate is beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. That's an interesting interpretation of what I said

Maybe you confused mine with a different post?

If you are suggesting that neither of them will experience any fallout or blowback from this, or that they will just slink off with their heads between their legs, I think you are mistaken.

I did visit the Drudge site, and his page now highlights the discrepancies between previous reports of remarks attributed to Ms. Polier's parents, and the statement from them today.

Both Drudge and the Sun are in business to make money.

I think it is unlikely that they will agree to fade away quietly because their stories displease you.

In fact, it is their very sensationalism that makes them popular. People read them, and then get into heated arguments about both the stories and the papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. How can the woman's parents be Republicans on one hand and voting
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 05:27 PM by Tinoire
How can the woman's parents be Republicans who don't like Kerry on one hand and voting for Kerry on the other? Things are not adding up correctly here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. First Kerry had an affair, now he is committing bribery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Blackmail... whatever
Kerry's "evil" knows no bounds. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Nothing shocks me anymore.
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 06:11 PM by stickdog
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. BushRove only have $200,000,000 to work with. I guess they were outbid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well according to Drudge, the Washington Post has a big scoop lined up...
http://www.drudgereport.com/mattjk7.htm

As first reported in this space, a serious investigation of the woman and the nature of her relationship with Sen. John Kerry has been underway at TIME magazine, ABC NEWS, the WASHINGTON POST, THE HILL and the ASSOCIATED PRESS, where the woman in question once worked.

I went over to TIME magazine and found NOTHING.

I think Matt is going a little boinkers in his old age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Drudge reports it, then manipulates the "mainstreams" into
doing his legwork since they are all hoping against hope to be able to report any ugliness they turn up about her.

Twisted, yes, but SOP nowadays. Even if the issue SHOULD be dead now, they are all clinging to a gossamer thread that something will come up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. SHOCKING! She dated Kerry's Finance Director!
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 06:11 PM by blondeatlast
Oh, my God! John Kerry must be stopped! He lets his campaign workers fraternize!

Um, Matt, sweetie, I have dated a couple of players in campaigns I've worked on.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightNurse Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I met My Husband (G.G.) on the McGovern Campaign
Hot,Campaign Time Sex is THE Best:evilgrin: :hippie: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightNurse Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Boinked in the Back Door Too Much.*
See* "Blinded By the Right":wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC