Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards rejects neoliberalism/NAFTA, criticises Clinton.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 02:04 PM
Original message
Edwards rejects neoliberalism/NAFTA, criticises Clinton.
Edwards jabs at former President Clinton

By AMY LORENTZEN, Associated Press Writer 39 minutes ago

Democratic presidential contender John Edwards on Monday criticized former President Clinton, arguing that he allowed corporate insiders to shape the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement that has cost U.S. jobs.

Edwards' complaints about the former president beloved by voters in his own party was a defiant move meant to highlight rival Hillary Rodham Clinton's relationship with special interests. It comes two days after Clinton refused Edwards' challenge to stop taking campaign donations from lobbyists, saying many represent good causes.

"It's time that the president stood up and fought for American workers," Edwards told a crowd of about 300 people at a union hall in Cedar Rapids. "It's time to have a president that always puts the interests of the American people first."

While Edwards' speech did not mention the name Clinton, the object of his complaint was obvious. Edwards criticized the presidential leadership during the 1993 passage of NAFTA, which was started by President George H.W. Bush and pushed through by Clinton. He said the trade agreement between the United States, Mexico and Canada was "written by insiders in all three countries."

Edwards said the policies of President George W. Bush have devastated towns and communities all across America, but "this is not just his doing."

"For far too long, presidents from both parties have entered into trade agreements, agreements like NAFTA, promising that they would create millions of new jobs and enrich communities," he said. "Instead, too many of these agreements have cost jobs and devastated towns and communities across this country."

Edwards' remarks come a day before he will share a stage with Hillary Clinton and other Democratic candidates at an AFL-CIO forum in Chicago in which the White House hopefuls will make their appeal to labor.

Responding to the criticism, Hillary Clinton's chief strategist, Mark Penn, issued a memo highlighting recent polls showing the New York senator leading the Democratic field and offering a ready answer to any rivals.

"She is the candidate of experience and change, a combination no other candidate can match. As a result we will likely see more attacks from her Democratic opponents, despite their claims to be practicing a new kind of politics or eschewing intraparty attacks," Penn wrote.

Edwards said the trade deal "did not serve the interests of regular workers. It included unprecedented rights for corporate investors, but no labor or environmental protections in the core text. And over the past 15 years, we have seen the growing inequality in the United States, and Mexico and in Canada."

Edwards used the campaign appearance to offer his trade proposals. The 2004 vice presidential nominee said the economy is growing and productivity is at an all-time high, but wages aren't keeping pace with the increased costs of education, health care and retirement. He blamed technological change and globalization, as well as outdated labor and workplace laws for a system that is benefiting the wealthiest and shortchanging workers.

"Trade has become a bad word for working Americans for a very simple reason — it's because our trade policies have been bad for working Americans," he said.

Edwards said his plan would:

• Require pro-worker provisions in new deals.

• Hold trade partners to their commitments.

• Invest more in dislocated workers and communities.

• Ensure that imports are safe

____

Associated Press Writer Nedra Pickler in Washington contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

John Edwards for President: http://johnedwards.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. real change requires departure from President Clinton's policies, especially on trade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Edwards scores with me again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jimdish25 Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. The difference between Edwards is night and day...
From trade, to consumer safety and workers rights. He's way ahead and that includes getting us out of Iraq. Hillary has gone into front-runner mode but she still sits uncomfortably on the fence in many respects. I have no more patience for that.

Hillary just wants us to "move-on" (to her first term). There will be no accountability for the lawlessnes or infringement on our rights. Just another smooth transition to a new group of establishment and DLC insiders. Just say no!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The media will ignore this.
1. Because they don't want to talk about the wrongs of NAFTA.

2. They don't want to give power to Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. "She is the candidate of experience and change'? Where did she get that experience?
What change is she offering?

The only change I see from her is who is selling out the American Worker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. She will be a change from * - but not nearly enough of a change...
If she gets into office we'll have to help her change more than she is now willing/capable.

I'd much, much rather have Edwards get in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
broadcaster Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think Edwards gets it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. He definitely does. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I concur!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJ9000 Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. His liberal platform coupled with his "electability" make him almost a "no-brainer" choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Responding... Mark Penn, issued a memo highlighting recent polls
Edited on Mon Aug-06-07 05:59 PM by Truth2Tell
So the Clinton campaign's response to criticism about policy is to point to her lead in the polls.

In other words, issues don't matter, Hillary is the consensus choice already, so nya nya on you.

edit to add: remind me again why f'n Mark Penn is still speaking for the Clinton campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Goddamn -- how can you not like this guy?

He may have fucked up on the IWR, but wow is he hitting all the right notes on the economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. Ironically enough - to take
a meme from Carville - "It's the economy, stupid".....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. That's his meme?

Well, it definitely beats "nasty little hobbitses!"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Here it is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It's_the_economy,_stupid

"The economy, stupid," was a phrase in American politics widely used during Bill Clinton's successful 1992 presidential campaign against George H.W. Bush. For a time, Bush was considered unbeatable because of foreign policy developments such as the end of the Cold War and the Persian Gulf War. The phrase, coined by Clinton campaign strategist James Carville, refers to the notion that Clinton was a better choice because Bush had not adequately addressed the economy, which was undergoing a recession at the time.

In order to keep the campaign on message, Carville hung a sign in Bill Clinton's Little Rock campaign headquarters with the following three points, roughly in haiku form:

Change vs. more of the same
The economy, stupid
Don't forget health care.


Although the sign was intended for an internal audience of campaign workers, the phrase became something of a slogan for the Clinton election campaign. Clinton's campaign used the recession to successfully unseat George H.W. Bush, whose approval ratings had been in the 80% range one year prior.


Gee - you would think that HRC's campaign would use some of this....

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. What Edwards has said has not transfered to more support.
Edited on Mon Aug-06-07 06:40 PM by calteacherguy
At least, it hasn't for the past 7 months.

Politics is a lot about personality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Edwards is looking better and better! I just may have to make the leap
Still listening - getting closer - reading everything.

I am for the middle class in this country and hope everyone who calls themselves a Democrat is too!!!!!!!:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. I agree with Edwards and I think Penn is a pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. This will play well to our Michigan voters.... K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Go, John!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
18. Stop the SPP -- NAFTA Plus
This is the US Stop SPP site.
The STOPSPP group is currently headquartered in Encinitas, CA and is composed of citizens who are very concerned about the US government’s plans to create a North American union and to use SPP as the vehicle to begin dismantling the USA.

SPP was started without involving Congress in any manner. Plans include erasing our borders, abolishing the US Dollar, and basically turning over the operation of our country including our justice system to an unholy cabal.


This is the Canadian Stop SPP site.

"STOP THE SPP!
- End War and Privatization
- Protect our Environment
- Reclaim Democracy


From August 19 to 21, Stephen Harper, George Bush, Mexican President Felipe Calderón and 30 corporate CEOs from Canada, Mexico and the US will meet in Montebello, Quebec, where they will continue to hammer out the so-called Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) or deep integration - behind closed doors!

Intentionally bypassing parliamentary oversight and public debate, These “leaders” are working by stealth to create a continental energy-resource pact (including water), and a North American security perimeter. They are also deciding policies that will have serious consequences for our environment and for our health.


The Powers That Be(TM) had intended for the Vietnam War to be "sustainable" for a very long time. The force of ordinary people standing up against it was the only thing that could and did end the war.
Non violent civil disobedience is the only thing that will stop this, too.
And stop the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq... and so on.

I have a prayer. I can think of no other thing to call it but a prayer. I want John Edwards to ride a wave of populism to the White House. He is saying all the right words to mobilize You The People. Heck, it's working for us "ferners", too.

Meet you on the barricades!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
21. Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. Thanks John Edwards. The Clinton's NAFTA was a hugh mistake that has wrecked many working
class lives. The ruling class doesn't give a fuck because it is good for corporate American and Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. .
Edited on Tue Aug-07-07 02:58 PM by BrightKnight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. still a CFR member ? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC