Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Terms seen met as U.S.-India nuclear text unveiled (Reuters)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 06:38 AM
Original message
Terms seen met as U.S.-India nuclear text unveiled (Reuters)
Source: Reuters

Terms seen met as U.S.-India nuclear text unveiled
Fri Aug 3, 2007 6:38AM EDT

By Y.P. Rajesh

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - India and the United States unveiled
the much-awaited text outlining their landmark civilian nuclear
cooperation deal on Friday, and analysts said it appeared to
have met New Delhi's key demands.

The deal aims to give India access to U.S. nuclear fuel and
equipment, overturning a three-decade ban imposed after
New Delhi, which has not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty,
conducted a nuclear test in 1974.

-snip-

The two countries had struggled to sew up the agreement
because India had wanted the United States to allow it to
reprocess spent nuclear fuel, assure permanent fuel supplies
and not penalize India by ending nuclear trade if it conducts
another nuclear test.

The text of the agreement showed that the first two demands
had largely been met, while there was no direct mention of
the consequences of another Indian test.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSDEL5531420070803

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh goody!
I've been waiting breathlessly for those India mangoes ever since I heard of this spectacular Bushista deal.....nukes for mangoes. Yummy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bad, Bad Idea. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC