Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Hill: Minimum-wage hike is rare gain for workers under employer-centered Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 07:21 PM
Original message
The Hill: Minimum-wage hike is rare gain for workers under employer-centered Bush

http://thehill.com/op-eds/minimum-wage-hike-is-rare-gain-for-workers-under-employer-centered-bush-2007-07-26.html

Minimum-wage hike is rare gain for workers under employer-centered Bush
By Oxford Analytica
July 26, 2007
The federal minimum wage on Wednesday rose by 70 cents, to $5.85 per hour, the first increase in nearly a decade.
While the minimum wage has risen, its effect has been partially offset by a May U.S. Supreme Court ruling that tightened the conditions for demonstrating discrimination in “pay parity” cases — strengthening the hand of employers. The rights and bargaining power of U.S. workers have declined since 2000.

That ruling, Ledbetter v. Goodyear, both tightened the conditions under which plaintiffs have standing to sue for pay disparity discrimination and weakened the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC’s) capacity to regulate employment conditions for U.S. workers. The ruling dovetails with the broader pro-market and pro-employer stance that the administration of President Bush has adopted. Conditions for U.S. workers, particularly those lower on the income scale, have become increasingly precarious, given:

• low U.S. union membership (12 percent of the workforce, the lowest in the Organisation for Economic and Co-operative Development); and

• surplus unskilled and semi-skilled labor, partly attributable to the growing pool of undocumented immigrants.

These conditions, largely invisible to the U.S. middle class, have helped former Sen. John Edwards’s (D-N.C.) presidential campaign achieve traction with populist appeals.

Employer-oriented policies
Bush entered the White House with a commitment to deregulate markets and reduce federal regulatory burdens on corporations, which he has pursued in several ways:

• Tax cuts. Bush followed through speedily on his pledge to reduce taxation on corporations and on the highest-earning taxpayers, initiating major legislation in June 2001 (subsequently augmented). Some Democratic presidential hopefuls, such as Edwards and Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.), have promised to reverse these cuts if elected.


FULL article at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I reject the stupid notion that Bush is pro-market
If he found healthy competition in a market favorable, he would be issuing anti-trust lawsuits to hell and back against corporate monopolies and even media monopolies. He favors stagnation and decay instead of innovation and change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Off set is right.
And what about the exporting of jobs overseas? My particular workplace has been very aggressive about that.

We so desperately need to take away the power from corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC