Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Trippi in Q&A session on what happened in Iowa and may in Wisc ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Casablanca Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 12:01 AM
Original message
Joe Trippi in Q&A session on what happened in Iowa and may in Wisc ...
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 12:47 AM by Casablanca
http://www.itconversations.com/transcript.php?id=72

Edited for length.

Ed: So this organization has a chance to continue?

Joe: ... I really do believe that Wisconsin is an opportunity to turn things, and let me tell you why really quickly, and then I think we've got to end this. What's going to happen here…it's the same dynamic that happened to Howard Dean. For about 12 months the question was: change versus the status quo. And for 12 months Howard Dean dominated that campaign. That status quo changed Dean. That's what got him to that high place where he wasn't rolling. Three or four weeks after Al Gore endorses this and now the press says -- and I'm now talking about the maliciousness now, I'm talking about the equation changes. It's now, "If you vote for Howard Dean in Iowa, he's the nominee." It's not, "Are we voting for change or status quo?" Howard Dean wins that. It's now, "If you vote for Howard Dean he's the nominee." So it's now are you ready to do that or you're not ready do that. The people of Iowa did not reject Howard Dean. What they said is, "Not yet. Not ready to do this." Yes, is a vote for dean. No, I am not ready to this looks like a flight away from the frontrunner. This happened to Bill Clinton in Colorado with Jerry Brown. It happened to Jimmy Carter in 1976, Jerry Brown again. It happened to Mike Dukakis with Jessie Jackson winning Michigan. The problem is that that whole movement got moved up before there had ever been a single vote. Now guess what is going to happen? I'll tell you exactly what's going to happen. John Kerry has been rolling. It's been, "Are we voting for momentum and he can win?" "Well, yeah that's we are voting for because I don't know anything else about him."

He wins Virginia and Tennessee tomorrow nigh, the press is going to say, "There is one thing left, Wisconsin. If John Kerry wins in Wisconsin he is the nominee." And for the first time since Iowa you're going to have a state where the equation is no longer change verses status quo or momentum and winning, but just like Iowa, if you vote for John Kerry you're saying, "Shut it down, he's it." And at that moment, every time in our history -- in the Democratic party's history -- whether it was Colorado, Iowa, wherever that happened, voters moved away from the frontrunner and said, "No we're no ready yet." I'm not saying that's going to happen, but it can happen and if it does then the fight is there, and in March 2 if this continues. And there's a chance right now for this moment to continue to build within a primary-nomination fight by Dean for America. If Kerry wins Wisconsin, it is over guys. It's over. He's the nominee. ...

----

Despite what Trippi says - stay in, Dean!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfjockey Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting that
I had read the speech, but not the Q & A. I think he should at least stay in until super Tuesday. After that it will be important to figure out what to do with the movement. Personally, I like the idea of using it to try to help take back the house and senate rather than using it to support Kerry directly.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casablanca Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed, and maybe a slush fund to buy our own lobbyists? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfjockey Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, if we continue to be a force in the election,
then maybe we won't need the lobbyists. The elected officials will owe us directly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC