Romney upset that Obama doesn't want adults inappropriately touching children

[Ian David]

Romney upset that Obama doesn't want adults inappropriately touching children
by John Aravosis (DC) · 7/19/2007 12:18:00 PM ET

And of all things, Pat Robertson's Web site defends Obama. Now I've seen it all.
http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/198169.aspx

But I just can't remain mad, after all, Romney is such a pretty fella.
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Mitt_Romney_spent_nearly_2K_on_0719.html

More:
http://www.americablog.com/2007/07/romney-upset-that-obama-doesnt-want.html

[whistle]

1. Where exactly would Mitt Romney want to touch children?

[Forkboy]

2. My head hurts.

[SoFlaJet]

3. A Prayer...

Dear God,
Please let Mitt Romney be the republic party's nominee for president next year
Amen

[Jack Rabbit]

4. What do Mitt Romney and Michal Vick have in common?

Neither should be allowed to inappropriately touch a dog.

[zulchzulu]

5. The CBN piece is pretty fair-minded on the issue

Age-appropriate sex education is something many parents wouldn't mind having. As it has been stated, it's not giving condoms to 5-year-olds or doing the Cucumber demo. It's more about alerting children of pedophiles.

Romney certainly must know about pedophiles in the Mormon community.

[rucky]

6. Run on that issue, Mitts!

It's a winner.

heh. Mitts.

Inappropriate touching.

[illinoisprogressive]

7. I read that the Christian Broadcasting endorsed Obama's idea to protect kids.

that means repukes cannot go after him as not having values. So romney looks stupid.