Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keeping amputees on active duty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Meeker Morgan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:06 PM
Original message
Keeping amputees on active duty
Really.

This is an official press release:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=46759

WASHINGTON, July 18, 2007 – A new prosthesis under development will give servicemember amputees more flexibility and help them better perform their military jobs if they choose to stay on active duty.

A preview of the new technology yesterday at Walter Reed Army Medical Center drew key staff and several servicemember amputees. The open forum allowed users to see improvements in prototype form and ask developers questions or offer suggestions.

In 2006, Otto Bock HealthCare, a global provider of prosthetic components that started out providing devices for German World War I veterans in 1919, began developing a prosthetic knee system that is an upgrade to its already popular C-Leg. It was awarded a three-year $1 million contract to develop a leg that will allow more servicemembers to stay on active duty if they choose to.

The prosthesis is for above-the-knee amputees and uses a microprocessor to control the knee’s hydraulic functions and anticipate the wearer’s actions and make changes in real time.

--- SNIP ---


Read the whole thing for more technical details.

It is truly astonishingly good technology, but ... :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. it just gets better doesn't it?
This will go down in history nest to the NAZI Volkssturm "ulcer" brigades.
The were assembled from old and unfit men that all needed the same medication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex1775 Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't see the problem here?
They aren't being forced to stay in, this is only to help them if they choose to stay in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grey Donating Member (933 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. however, what if they.......
must stay in to receive the new technology?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC