|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
CarolNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 01:22 PM Original message |
Have Edwards or Clinton said anything about "the exchange" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. That is exactly what they should do - the longer they ignore it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. Exactly !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 01:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. My understanding is that Edwards initiated this conversation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Clinton's people worked on this BEFORE that exchange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Clinton's people with Edwards' people it sounds to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. They both participated in the conversation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
30. of course you think it's edwards fault. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
3. This is all i've seen so far - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. No answer from either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CarolNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yeah.....two non-answers...interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Two non answerers for a non story. Quite interesting. NT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Will HRC start picking where and when the Dems can debate next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Why should she? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yep, so you would think she would be blowing him out and outraising him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Have you seen the Michigan polls? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. 29% HRC, 24% Obama...Shouldn't she be blowing him OUT?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Thats great, since Obama is and always will be a second fiddle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:42 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. And where was Bill Clinton at the polls in 1992 and Kerry in 2004 at the same time? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. New one just came out from Strategic Visions; Hillary 32%, Obama 26% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Looked at logically, that poll also means that 68% of Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. If you want to use logic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Lets look at more logic: 52% of general population will not vote for her. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. When did we have a election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. What kind of "logic" would that be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Keep telling yourself "ONLY" 68% want someone else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. That does not jive with any poll out there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Its bizarro logic that has no basis in reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Logic really isn't your strong suit, is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
5. They are probably working on something that matches up for both campaigns, which will be a denial.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
29. Clinton will not apologize while Edwards will... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-13-07 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
31. "Edwards told reporters in Iowa that he wasn't in favor of barring anyone from future gatherings" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC