|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:31 PM Original message |
Pelosi is demanded to pull a rabbit out of a hat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not taking a firm stand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. please tell me how she verbally kissed bush's ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Oh, you haven't read the quote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
63. That quote sounds like "damning with faint praise" to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
85. Not a decent man - a "LOVELY man". "Nice" and "courageous", too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 11:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
23. I keep hearing that statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 02:07 AM Response to Reply #23 |
37. Sorry, but where I come from you don't treat lying, murdering scum with respect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
assclown_bush (573 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:19 PM Response to Reply #37 |
71. You must not be from Washington D.C. then...it is politically expedient to negotiate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #71 |
81. Yes, unless your foe has oil. Then you can murder them. Or if your foe is named Kennedy, you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
assclown_bush (573 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #81 |
88. I don't understand the nature of your reply? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:42 PM Response to Reply #88 |
97. The funny thing is, some people never get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #97 |
133. We don't get it, because you speak in code or hyperbole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #71 |
86. What expedience? What has this respectfulness gotten us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
assclown_bush (573 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #86 |
92. It has not been that long since we gained control of congress... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 01:20 AM Response to Reply #1 |
34. you push the bill every day until the opposition caves. you twist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. That's one way to look at it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Love Your McKinney Avi : ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Have any documented links that Pelosi isn't trying to get the votes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 11:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. You mean prove a negative? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #10 |
48. How about a good ol' trout slap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
87. Have you any evidence that she IS trying to get them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #10 |
124. How about just talking about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 08:35 PM Response to Reply #124 |
140. Talk about what was done wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 12:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
29. From where.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
94. wtmusic your post is as uninformed as your icon was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 07:29 AM Response to Reply #2 |
113. How do you know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #113 |
123. Yeah that "off the table" bit was just some shrewd arm-twisting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM Response to Reply #123 |
147. Why don't YOU run for Congress and then make your way up to Speaker of House? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #147 |
149. I wouldn't want to embarrass her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtime dfl_er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. You know what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 11:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. If Nancy mentions impeachment in a favorable way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
4. How dare you be so rational!?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pocoloco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
8. Is that where the "impeachment off the table" deal came from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
9. It took 3 years of legislation to finally shut the Vietnam War down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. but I want overnight results and stuff - why won't Pelosi give us that????nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Give me back the Remote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SledDriver (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. She moved very quickly to take impeachment off the table... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
assclown_bush (573 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
72. Instant satisfaction or else!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
90. Funny - the "realists" are saying, We can't produce impeachment immediately, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Good point, but... there was no INTERNET... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. So you think the Internet is more efficient than the goold old phone call? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slampoet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 11:31 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. I can send an email to 300 people at once. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 12:07 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Holy cow! 300 people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slampoet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #27 |
67. Just like they get out of their chair to take EVERY phone call? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:49 AM Response to Reply #22 |
44. You could call 300 people on a phone in 1972 in a couple hours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #44 |
50. Even with one of these beauties! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slampoet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:03 PM Response to Reply #44 |
65. In 1972 nobody had answering machines. They also worked 9-5, mostly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:41 PM Response to Reply #65 |
73. There were answering machines AND mobile phones in 1972 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #22 |
51. And you don't think that your elected officials can spot astroturf form letters a mile away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 09:13 AM Response to Reply #15 |
46. How many people had... ummm... access to ARPA?? 10,000,000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slampoet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #46 |
66. 10 million? Try more like 40 thousand, at best with colleges counted too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenLeft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. thank you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
62. Actually, it took Watergate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:39 PM Response to Reply #9 |
95. Man, you're letting facts get in your way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. Shit, you could hand Pelosi a hat with a rabbit in it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
96. Jgraz: because it's the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SledDriver (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
17. It's not about Cindy actually winning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:30 AM Response to Reply #17 |
40. All Cindy is going to do is make herself look foolish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SledDriver (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:30 AM Response to Reply #40 |
47. Cindy has done more for the anti-war movement than Pelosi has. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #47 |
98. Nancy was rounding up votes against the war in 2002 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SledDriver (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 01:35 AM Response to Reply #98 |
109. Good for her! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 01:09 PM Response to Reply #17 |
57. So Sheehan thinks putting a Republican in that seat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #57 |
83. Last time around the Republican won 12% of the votes in Pelosi's district |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
18. I guess many are sick of war-enablers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 11:56 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. I think you aren't seeing the effort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 12:52 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. "They've done everything but cut off funding for the troops." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 01:06 PM Response to Reply #31 |
55. You are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Layla_Z (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
19. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:54 AM Response to Reply #19 |
42. Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
21. Ultimatums are so dumb. They do nothing to promote anyone's case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:06 AM Response to Reply #21 |
43. I call bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whopis01 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:04 PM Response to Reply #21 |
70. running for office is just politcs as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 09:31 PM Response to Reply #70 |
78. But what is the point here? Bush will be out of office by the time Sheehan has any chance of being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whopis01 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #78 |
125. The point is simply this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #125 |
134. So...not pulling a miracle out of your *ss and getting impeachment through despite not having the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whopis01 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:32 AM Response to Reply #134 |
144. I would not say that for myself, however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 07:33 AM Response to Reply #21 |
114. Exactly! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
28. Here is a political reality: It was the impeachment hearings that changed public opinion on Nixon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:21 AM Response to Reply #28 |
39. Here's historical reality: the vote to start the Nixon impeachment inquiry was 410-4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 07:37 AM Response to Reply #28 |
115. You've got your history wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:20 PM Response to Reply #115 |
132. Thank you for that informative info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
30. For a Senate convction, more than a dozen REPUBLICAN votes are needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:46 PM Response to Reply #30 |
99. Actually 18 Republicans need to support impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knowledgeispwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
32. Now don't you go making sense! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
33. It's not Nancy Pelosi's decision to go forward/not go forward. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 01:14 PM Response to Reply #33 |
58. What public demand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #58 |
126. There was no demand for it in 1998 either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
35. Pelosi will wait for Hillary to be elected to end the war, while she decorates he new plane... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 01:23 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Nice zinger, just go ahead and parrot the right wing spin like a good robot (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #36 |
49. No shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:45 AM Response to Original message |
38. She can at least act like a representative of the people and do the right thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #38 |
59. She is representing the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:00 PM Response to Reply #59 |
75. She was elected by Democrats. She needs to listen to her party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 06:58 AM Response to Reply #75 |
111. I'm a Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 07:46 AM Response to Reply #75 |
116. She was elected by the House Democrats - the vast majority of whom don't want impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:01 PM Response to Reply #59 |
76. I know this is a concept, but how about Nancy doing to right thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:35 AM Response to Original message |
41. I agree that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
45. "The votes aren't there!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Magrittes Pipe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
52. Your sanity and reason will find no purchase here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
53. Good cop -- Good cop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
54. I hope that Cindy takes the wind out of her Highness Pelsoi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:50 PM Response to Reply #54 |
100. Sheehan can't touch Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #100 |
119. Don't 'ya kind of think everyone knows that? LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #119 |
128. Sadly, no I don't assume people know anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
56. INTRODUCE legislation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
60. Rec numero 20. I support Cindy's run if she does so as a Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. I do, too. It's entirely her right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 09:47 PM Response to Reply #64 |
80. Of course not silly, you don't live in San Fransisco. You can't vote for her or against her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 10:32 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Even if I lived there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 12:09 AM Response to Reply #82 |
102. I agree that activism and legislating aren't equivalent skill sets, but are related skill sets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 02:31 AM Response to Reply #102 |
110. Roosevelt did not "start" World War 2. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:28 AM Response to Reply #110 |
122. And Hillary said that "Americans are the hardest working people on earth," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #82 |
131. Sheehan is getting her talking points by cribbing from Bob Dole's old speeches |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:52 PM Response to Reply #80 |
101. Cindy can't vote for or against Cindy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #101 |
105. She said Pelosi won't put the constitution, including the impeachment part, back on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #105 |
117. I wasn't crazy about Hillary's move to NY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #117 |
121. Well, taking the constitution off the table make the Democratic party look pretty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #121 |
127. Ah, twisting Pelosi's words to make her look bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 06:25 PM Response to Reply #127 |
135. Why would she state that a portion of the consitution is "Off the table." She said it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 08:32 PM Response to Reply #135 |
138. She said impeachment is off the table (present tense) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 10:01 PM Response to Reply #138 |
142. If your idea of participatory democracy is leaving everything up to our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 10:30 PM Response to Reply #142 |
143. You are way off base |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
61. Ah, just what we needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
68. Oh fer god's sake....get it right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Geek_Girl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
69. It's not about political survival it's about principle and doing what is right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Progressive Friend (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
74. Americans Would Impeach Cheney, Split on Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Progressive Friend (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 10:51 PM Response to Reply #74 |
84. more.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
77. More like her head out of her ass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:06 PM Response to Reply #77 |
91. Oh really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 12:11 AM Response to Reply #91 |
103. If she comes through on it, her head is out of her ass. If???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 12:11 AM Response to Reply #103 |
104. Well, okay then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
79. The peope who put the Dems in power are pissed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:04 PM Response to Reply #79 |
89. So did "they" elect you their spokesperson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 12:57 AM Response to Reply #89 |
107. Yeah the 23% Dem controlled congress approval rating has me worried too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-10-07 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
93. No if Sheehan wins unicorns and kittens will not save sunshine and rainbows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
106. Yes!! That's why we need to crack these scandals wide open. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:12 PM Response to Reply #106 |
130. What do you mean where to start? They started... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
108. the only magic trick I'm interested in is making Bush disappear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
112. *BZZZZZ!* Wrong Answer! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 10:42 AM Response to Reply #112 |
118. Defund the war and Bush will use Defense Appropriations for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:02 AM Response to Reply #118 |
120. It was that simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #120 |
129. No that wouldn't end it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 07:43 PM Response to Reply #129 |
136. Yes. I even did.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 08:14 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. I agree they should stand up, I think Pelosi did stand up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 07:48 AM Response to Reply #137 |
146. Dearest Creekdog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:36 AM Response to Reply #146 |
151. I thought this was about the war funding and not about your hurt feelings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 07:20 AM Response to Reply #129 |
145. Umm, most of the defense dept funding is already earmarked and appropriated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:30 AM Response to Reply #145 |
150. Yes Madhound, the prez would do that despite your arguments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:02 AM Response to Reply #150 |
152. So we're now going to use the excuse of what *might* happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
139. She wanted the job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #139 |
141. Yeah well you don't always get what you want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:04 AM Response to Reply #141 |
148. You're dead on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC