The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution's search warrant requirement,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Warrant_requirementhas some exceptions, though none use an a priori 'standing' requirement, logically. You simply be human and be in the USofA and the 4th Amendment to the Constitution applies to YOU. In fact, the law enforcement entity has to go to the courts first under the suspicion you MAY HAVE committed some sort of violation (conjured up somewhere, maybe ?) before they can come and get you, at least domestically in the USofA. This used to be the logic.
Times has changed, folks. Big Brother and his Federalist Society flunkies have plans for you. Under the Congressional Authorizations for Use of Military Farce, one from Sept 2001 (9-11 'war on terror', undefined and eternal) and the other from Oct 2002 (Iraq, same issue, eternal too ?), both have the War Powers Resolution embedded within them. These AUMFs are mentioned extensively in the 6th Dist Appeals Court decision,
ACLU vs NSA Nos. 06-2095/2140
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/07a0253p-06.pdfThe War Powers resolution requires "clear" (read truthful), "situations" and "circumstances" prior to Congress authorizing military force IN COOPERATION with the President...not in SUBORDINATION to the President.
It seems the Federalist Society's agenda and the M/I/Congressional complex has found the judges it needs.
Time for Congress to fix this mess and re-examine those AUMFs, as Sen John Warner mentioned. And hey, Warner's from what political party ?