Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court rules "To sanction such presidential authority...disastrous consequences for the constitution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:17 PM
Original message
Court rules "To sanction such presidential authority...disastrous consequences for the constitution
Court Rebuffs Bush On Enemy Combatants
Rules U.S. Can't Detain U.S. Resident Accused Of Terror Ties Without Charging Him
RICHMOND, Va. , June 11, 2007
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/11/terror/main2913398.shtml

(CBS/AP) The Bush administration cannot legally detain a U.S. resident it deems an al Qaeda sleeper agent without charge and must allow him to be released from military detention, a divided federal appeals court ruled Monday.

The court said sanctioning the indefinite detention of civilians would have "disastrous consequences for the constitution and the country."

In the 2-1 decision, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel also ruled that the federal Military Commissions Act does not strip Qatari national Ali al-Marri of his constitutional rights to challenge his accusers in court. He is the only person being held as an enemy combatant on U.S. soil.

"To sanction such presidential authority to order the military to seize and indefinitely detain civilians, even if the President calls them 'enemy combatants,' would have disastrous consequences for the constitution — and the country," the court said in its opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, the ball is in the dictator's court. What will the fascist slime
do now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They'll probably "stay the course" and take it all the way to the SCOTUS.
Or.. he'll ignore it since he honestly thinks he's above the law of the land. x(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
19jet54 Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Invade Iran...
... for the distraction alone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unbelievable that 1 judge actually voted for bush on this.
Does anyone know who the three judges were and how they voted? I didn't see that mentioned in the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here...
The two judges in the majority, Diana Gribbon Motz and Roger Gregory, were appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton. Judge Henry Hudson, who dissented, is a U.S. district judge, appointed by President George W. Bush, serving on the case by special appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks. I hope the majority on the 4th circuit aren't bush appointees. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good news - Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Remarkable, since the 4th Cir. is one of the more conservative courts
Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC