Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Other candidates would be smart to defend Kerry, attack sex-smear politics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:58 AM
Original message
Other candidates would be smart to defend Kerry, attack sex-smear politics
If I were one of the other candidates, I would take up the issue preemptively by defending Kerry against an invasion of privacy. This would be the right thing to do and obviously would have its collateral opportunistic benefits. I should make a speech delivering the following points:

"Whatever love relations consenting adults may have are not the media's business. These may be happy or tragic for the people involved, but irrelevant to the public interest. In 1992, 1996 and 1998 the American people had the opportunity to show whether they would vote based on stories about sex lives, and they did not do so. They may not approve of the behavior, but they know it has nothing to do with the business of government. They are sick of media-driven distractions from the issues that actually affect their lives. The impeachment and scandal over Clinton's consensual affairs were an enormous waste of our country's energies. It was enormously destructive to our country that for two years the main issue was the sex life of the man, instead of the decisions of the job. Was that really worth it? This is true even if you abhor Clinton's personal behavior. The worst thing he did was to lie about it, instead of making a clear statement that it was nobody's business. (Cite Bush example?) (?I have nothing to hide but...?) I will make no statements about things that every reasonable person will agree are rightly private, and no one else should have to either. STOP THE SEX SMEARING."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nope.
Defending adultery would make them look like FOOLS to Middle Americans. They would be better off staying out of it. Adultery IS still frowned on here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. who the hell is defending adultery?
This is about defending privacy! And Dean as the rather obvious candidate and true libertarian in the race the perfect man to deliver this message.

Stop treating Middle America like fools. Do you think that many people (who are going to vote) actually cared about Janet Jackson's boob?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Defending adultery is exactly what it would be.
I stand by my original statement that they would be wise to avoid the entire subject, and let Sen. Kerry deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. And then when it happens to them, they can deal with it themselves.
Paging Martin Niemoller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Our candidate was smeared by the Osama ad and the scream frenzy
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 12:30 PM by JVS
Kerry supporters can deal with this scandal themselves.

I find the reference to Niemoller offensive. It is an insult to those who actually stood up to tyrany to put Kerry, who has collaborated so heavily with Bush, in their place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Bingo!
I didn't exactly have to make extra sandwiches and open the fiold-out sofa to accomodate all the support WE got over that particular bunch of bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. I personally posted a bunch of times trying to shut up the "scream" stuff.
But what the hell, bitterness reigns and revenge will have its day. Screw the party and our chances in November!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. "stood up to tyrany to put Kerry . . . in their place"?
What could you possibly be talking about? What tyranny? Who "actually stood up"? Do you mean that we should hail the people who are smearing Kerry or spreading the smear now as heroes?

When your candidate was in front, you wanted and expected the support of other Democrats in the event that he received the nomination. Can you take a moment to reflect on how pointless and destructive all this bile is now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Those who stood up to Hitler's tyranny (Communists, trade unionists, etc.)
It is an insult to their heroism to put Kerry in their place
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Oh, sorry, I completely misunderstood your post.
But communists, trade unionists, Jews, etc. did not "stand up to Hitler's tyranny" merely by being communists, trade unionists, and Jews. The point of the original quote is that nobody was standing up to Hitler's tyranny. It was a call for somebody to do the right thing before it was too late for everybody. The people Hitler "came for" are enumerated as victims, not heroes. And I feel comfortable portraying Kerry as a victim of this reprehensible smear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I have seen the memorial to the Reichstag members who voted against...
the enabling act. They were stood up to Hitler and died. Kerry is not worthy of the honor that they deserve. They took a stand!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. The Niemoller quote is not about the Reichstag members
who voted against the enabling act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. That was the SPD faction, they would all be covered under trade unionists
Look, a right wing smear from some news-blogger does not a Hitlerian reign of terrror make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. As a married woman, I'm anti-adultery.
As a parent of a 20 year old, I'm against old men in power trying to sleep with young women for ego gratification, (which is at the heart of these types of stories).

As a Democrat, I'd like to see a candidate that is smart enough to refrain from chasing young women. And one that believes in marriage vows.. but maybe I'm old fashioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. You're very much mainstream.
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 11:30 AM by Padraig18
Your values are those that are shared by a VAST majority of the electorate. The "Nothing to see here, move along!" crowd knows this, which is why they want everyone to drop it--- it interferes with their dreams of Presidential grandeur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. It bothers me that these sex scandals are always sex with a subordinate
It reeks of using authority for sex. Consent is easier to pry from someone when you have that much power over them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Okay, so to whom is a Senator subordinate to?
Like, nobody?

SO I guess your solution is on inauguration they must take a vow of chastity on pain of removal from office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. I am subordinate to no Senator or President! An intern OTOH is.
If I screw the cashier at the grocery store, it's all good. I have no authority over her.

If the manager of the grocery store screws the cashier, then there is an ethical problem.

It really isn't as hard as it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. So, that would annul what, about 20 percent of all marriages?
In which the manager and the cashier fall in love and get married.

In which coworkers fall in love and get married (and one of them invariably is on a higher level than another).

How many marriages started like that? How many bosses married their secretaries?

How many of the writers on this thread might be children of such unions?!

(Not to mention situations in which coworkers fall in lust and just screw. Oh bugger! I just remembered one of my best affairs was with my boss of the time! And she was waaay older than me! But it's okay, I was the evil male making the advances...)

So is there also harrassment? You bet.

Do you think maybe there is no general rule you can apply to this situation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. That boss was engaging in unethical behavior
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. Hey, you asked me about stuff. I'm just calling it as I see it.
I am also not suggesting any punishments or calling for a crusade. You ask if I approve and my answer is clear: I do not. To accuse me of crusaderhood is uncalled for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
53. I don't know.. perhaps they could have sex with their WIFE?
It's age and power thing. An affair is wrong.. but an affair between a man 58 and a young girl who is one year out of her teens would be extremely distasteful to voters. They have daughters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. So if a story came out accusing Dean of having an affair
you would advise the other candidates to do what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. We asked the other candidates to condemn the Osama ad
but it seems that Gep and Kerry were the candidates who FUNDED the Osama ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. The Osama ad has nothing to do with this
but now I understand why Dean supporters are so giddy about the Kerry story. Too bad it won't help anybody running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:34 PM
Original message
It's not our problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drfemoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
59. and the Osama ad helped who? n/t
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 05:37 PM by drfemoe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. unsubstatiated rumor and innuendo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. Kerry DID denounce the Osama ad..this information is readily available
and has been posted several times thoughout the past few days. It's a shame that those MOST WANTING to hear that denouncement have not been present on those threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drfemoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #42
60. I just read it for the first time
not good enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Especially ones who claim the higher ground when it comes to
the sanctity of marriage? the same ones who pass judgement on the private lives of others...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Except (important point)
Those who actually engage in sex-smear politics, like most of the Republicans, are themselves open game, of course, because of the evident hypocrisy! For example, it's irrelevant that Drudge is gay, until he makes an issue of other people's private lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. These FALSE charges go to the issue of electibility
I assume they are false because of the source.

However, the problem is that this calls up the memory of the Clinton White House and the Lewinsky affair. The incredible time spent over that (and the millions of tax payer dollars the GOP pissed away on that witchhunt) is still on the minds of lots of voters.

Nobody wants to go through that again. That's why this is really such an effective attack because it raises questions in people's minds as to whether Kerry is electible and, if he is, can he possibly be an effective President.

This one just has to be a Rove Production (c)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. ANY candidate can be accused of having an affair.
All they have to do is get one woman to lie. If Kerry gets shoved out because of this, what makes you think it won't happen again to the next leading Democratic candidate? The Republicans know a weak spot when they see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I would be genuinely surprised if the could pin it on
Dean, Edwards, Kucinich,

Sharpton and Senator Kerry? Easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Why?
Did I miss something? I've never heard of Kerry having a problem keeping it in his pants. Why would Dean or Kucinich get a free pass? I'm genuinely curious about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. call it gut instinct
or an educated guess. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
32. It's more effective if the candidate has a reputation for womanizing
Clinton and Kerry have the reputations that make even a false accusation more believable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
52. Which makes me wonder if the story is really derived by Rove.
He would have waited till after the voters had no other choice. He's evil, but he's smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kerry rushed to defend Dean against Osama ad.
Oh I forgot, Kerry helped fund that ad. Kerry deserves this 100% IMO. Maybe Teresa will leave him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. That would rock!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Any woman who ever dated any of them is being hunted down

Anyone who runs for national office should expect as much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. This brings up an important point...
Does it occur to anyone that the young woman accepting the advances of an old man might herself be a sovereign subject, making her own decisions? An adult?!

Oh, no, she can only be a child-like idiot who is taken advantage of. She hasn't gotten enough abstinence and marital sanctity training to know the difference.

She's a victim, that's all she can be, and the man who makes the advances is a villain, that's all he can be.

Meanwhile, back to the real world...

If you can show evidence of harrassment (meaning sexual advances forced on an unwilling person) or abuse of power (i.e., extortion, blackmail or punishment), then there is a real problem.

I am not buying the "implicit" abuse of power argument that any older man making advances to a younger woman is automatically in the wrong. Look around you, you will see quite a few lower-status men, even older ones, landing in bed with women of all ages, too.

(Now that you've had a look: leave them alone!)

Is there such an implicit abuse of power in many countless cases? Hell, yeah! But how do we distinguish it from a case where there is not an abuse? And what is the cure?

I say it lies in leveling out the power, not in making unworkable prudish rules for it (that will only be applied selectively to the secularists, rarely to the pseudo-pious).

Newsflash. People like to have sex.

Newsflash. Not all sexual relations are defined by power or the abuse thereof.

Newsflash. Where power is involved, they are still adults and it may well be an aphrodisiac.

"Adultery." "Cheating." "Betrayal."

The terms make the crime. What's wrong with consenting adults having sex? It's nobody's goddamn business!

How do you intend to cure human nature? People get attracted to each other, they intentionally attract each other, they make advances, and it is not for you to judge them for it, or to set up the acceptable age criteria.

They may be shrivelled up lizards to you, but a young woman might be attracted to them anyway! What do you think is the right solution? Exile her to Africa? Hound her for interviews? Or just leave them both alone, already?

THERE ARE REAL ISSUES AT STAKE IN THE PRESIDENCY. STICK TO THOSE.

GET A LIFE, AMERICANS. GROW UP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. Dean remarked that he wouldn't touch the issue with a 10-foot pole
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 11:24 AM by Straight Shooter
I put on hip waders and checked out rush's site last night. He has the quote there.

The GOP wants everybody to step in it. Dean, of all people, has learned to keep his opinions to himself regarding inflammatory issues. And, besides, anything he says would be taken out of context, distorted, et cetera.

This is just the beginning of peeling kerry's onion.

edit semantics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. well, I do have mixed feelings about it.
"Peeling Kerry's onion." Yeah, most of those not blinded by the "electability" bull dada would like to see that.

Can't we do that by focusing on the Iraq war? The PATRIOT Act? Plan Colombia? NAFTA, "Free" Trade?

Can't it at least be Skull and Bones?

Does it have to be an affair? Can we only ever get political results in this country by reactionary means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. The way they defended Dean from the Osama ad? N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. The candidates should together condemn these attacks
The right way to distinguish candidates is on their voting record and their platforms.

This is what Bush did to Governor Richards, Senator McCain, and Senator Cleland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. One problem with that strategy:
If it turns out that the allegations are true, the rest of the candidates look like FOOLS, Dan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. Not if the stand they take is the one Kucinich already took.
That it is a personal matter, none of our business, not worthy of discussion as an issue in a presidential election. That stays true no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. That's why Kucinich is the shi...
I mean that's why he has my vote. :)

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. Classiest, anyway, of all the candidates still running.
I'm tempted to say the same thing about his supporters, but there's that rule against broad characterizations. And the invidious comparison wouldn't be entirely in the Mods' imaginations, either. Anyway, props to you and your candidate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
21. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
30. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
RUN C:\GROVELBOT.EXE

This week is our first quarter 2004 fund drive.
Please take a moment to donate to DU. Thank you
for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
41. Not if it gives them an edge on ad hominem attacks to defend their losing
candidacy. *sarcasm on*

Yes the DEMOCRATIC WING of the DEMOCRATIC party as some candidates are so fond of calling themselves really should speak up about this...that would be the way to defend THEIR treatment by the media without being a big crybaby about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
47. The best way to stop the sex smearing is to refuse to give
it any time or attention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. NOW you tell us!
Where were you before the gazillion threads quoting well-known liberal Matt Drudge got started on this topic?

LOL and thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. I wish it were that simple!
The only way to stop it, given that it has been an omnipresent monster in politics, is to defang it.

Clinton had the chance to do something useful for a change, and he didn't. All he had to do was say:

- NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS

- OBVIOUSLY TRIVIAL TO THE ISSUES OF PRESIDENCY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
56. Kerry is a big boy
He can take care of himself. The other candidates should stay away from this. If it turns out to be true then all of them will be tarred with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
57. hear, hear!
Stop the madness. Its a non-story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
58. I agree. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC