Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Scream

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:37 AM
Original message
The Scream
http://www.makethemaccountable.com/podvin/media/040201_TheScream.htm

This is a good piece about how the media has been covering Dean and why. I am not including the last paragraph but you should read it.
This is how many of us felt about the media for years now. However since the media smear of Dean has served other candidates so well.....oh well
*****************************************************************
By David Podvin

On December 1, 2003, Howard Dean was ahead by twenty points in the polls when he appeared on Hardball with Chris Matthews and said, “We're going to break up the giant media enterprises.” This pronouncement went far beyond the governor’s previous public musings about possibly re-regulating the communications industry, and amounted to a declaration of war on the corporations that administer the flow of information in the United States.

It was an extraordinarily noble and dangerous thing to do: when he advocated a truly free press, Dr. Dean was provoking the corrupt media conglomerates that control what most Americans see and hear and read, and thereby control what most Americans think.

The media giants quickly responded by crushing his high-flying campaign with the greatest of ease. This time, they didn’t even have to invent a scandal in order to achieve the desired result; merely by chanting the word “unelectable” at maximum volume, the mainstream media maneuvered Democratic voters into switching their support to someone who poses no threat to the status quo.

John Kerry is a member in good standing of the feeble Daschle/Biden/Feinstein wing of the Democratic Party, a group of politicians whose disagreements with the mercantile elite tend to be merely rhetorical. Any doubts about Kerry’s level of commitment to his stated progressive beliefs were conclusively answered in 1994 when he proclaimed himself “delighted” with the Republican takeover of Congress. The media oligarchy knows that a general election race between Kerry and George W. Bush will insure a continuation of its monopoly, regardless of who wins.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catholic Sensation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's crazy
because I was thinking the same thing when I heard Wolf Blitzer almost blame Dean for how the media portrayed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Howard Dean is an impulsive man.
He walked into a room full of screaming supporters and didn't have the depth and foresight to see beyond that room to the millions of supporters and POTENTIAL supporters out there in TV land.
He had an opportunity to shine with a gracious concession speech and he blew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. concession speech?
lol

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0212-07.htm

Here is another link about the way the media has treated the different candidates. Care to address the facts here?

Dean does not suggest that he has run an error-free campaign. He admits to plenty of mistakes. But his complaint that he has not gotten fair coverage is echoed in a report from the Center for Media and Public Affairs. The center's study of 187 CBS, NBC and ABC evening news reports found that only 49 percent of all on-air evaluations of Dean in 2003 were positive. The other Democratic contenders collectively received 78 percent favorable coverage during the period.

In the week after the Iowa caucuses, the center found that only 39 percent of the coverage of Dean on network evening news programs was positive; in contrast, 86 percent of the coverage of North Carolina Sen. John Edwards was positive, as was 71 percent of the coverage of Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, the new front-runner.

Even CNN's general manager now admits that the cable networks overplayed the "scream" - which was aired 633 times on national networks in the four days after Iowa voted on Jan. 19.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Media is a mirror
Dean was the source of any negativity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Mirror of what?
Who does their bidding?

http://media.guardian.co.uk/city/story/0,7497,1144464,00.html

Who does their damn bidding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Apparently, so is Kerry.
Kerry just acts on other impulses.

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. LOL! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, gee thanks for reminding me.
I am depressed. Dean and supporters have been successfully marginalized and neutered.

I have lost all hope that this country will ever again move toward an progressive agenda for the people who most need one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. thank you for kicking my thread
and with such an enligtening comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libview Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. all I can say is........
YYYYEEEEEAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. thank you for kicking my thread
brilliant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libview Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. YYYYYYYEEEEEEERRRRRRRRR Welcome!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. It's. Yeeeeaarrrgg, Get it right okay? "The scream heard around the world"
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 10:30 AM by oasis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yep, the media domonation gets worse every election
Every election the media does a really shitty job. They talk more about strategy than about issues. They marginalize candidates who are not plain vanilla.

Then they goe through a lot of navel gazing and admit that they screwed up. And then the next time around, they are even worse.

Until people wake up to the overwhelming dominance of the media in a process tat is supposedly driven by actual people, we will continue to live in a Neo-Totalitarian country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. We are never going to have a candidate or party which can fight this
because we won't get behind the people who would. Beleive me, I have some friends who have screamed for years about the media manipulation. They are now just as sheeplike as anyone else falling in line with the media annointed candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BidMarx Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. infidelity vs Yeaaaaargh
Whos unelectable now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. welcome to DU BidMarx
It's good to see new people are still showing up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
18. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC