Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question, if Hillary /Byrd nullifies IWAR today, will you "forgive" her vote ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 04:25 PM
Original message
Question, if Hillary /Byrd nullifies IWAR today, will you "forgive" her vote ?
Would you reconsider supporting her if he effectively "ends" the war? Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Divide Et Impera Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Absolutely!!!
Reverse this course....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. No!!! Hillary is a DLC er and that says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. What is going on? please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. No.
And if she doesn't nullify it, I'd... like her even less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'll get back to you after I ask the opinion of the families of the 3,400+ soldiers
For expediency I won't go through the effort of trying to ask the families of the 600,000 collateral damage victims in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. I will forgive her IWR vote
But it won't get her my vote in the primary. So far Edwards is sounding good, everyone else (DK excepted) doesn't really light my fire, too vague in their plans. GE support? Sure, why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. All this maneuvering doesn't make up for the fact that she and Bill are
Edited on Thu May-03-07 05:35 PM by Gloria
corporatists. Just reminiscing about how Bill's best friend Mack McLarty is in business with Henry Kissinger, the guy who was supposed to find out the "truth" about 911 until he was shouted out of town.

Ugh. We need a change this election, not a continuation of this crap....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. HRC continues to vote to finance a war she allegedly opposes
Edited on Thu May-03-07 05:35 PM by draft_mario_cuomo
She is for it--while she is against it. Only when she puts her votes and her money where her mouth currently is should she get credit for being anti-war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Edwards has the distinct "advantage" of not having to put his money where his mouth is
He can mea culpa till the cows come home, Hillary and Byrd (and I hope Obama joins them) can actually do something about it.

I just hope they follow through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Edwards has put his money where his mouth is
Edwards is running ads to advocate his position of the Democrats standing up to Bush for a change. Others, unlike Edwards, favor retreat and surrender in the face of Bush's stubbornness.

You are partly right that both HRC and Obama can--if they choose to--exercise leadership to help bring this war to an end in the Senate. Let's hope they do so and support full withdrawal (not a simple de-escalation that will leave tens of thousands of "non-combat" troops in Iraq) and stop signing blank checks for Bush and his war. You cannot say you are against something that you are financing. That is like saying you oppose your cousin's drug abuse even though you keep footing the bill for his drug purchases!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't understand why when over 17 or more democrats voted for the war
she is the only one people keep harping about....she has said over and over and over and over....if she had known before she voted what she knows now about the bush lies she wouldn't have voted.

But I guess they hold Hillary Clinton to a higher standard than any one in politics, should she be on a par with the Pope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I hold them all accountable
but those now running for prez (HRC, Edwards, Biden, Dodd) really piss me off with the apologies, the excuses, the hindsight speechifying and now ta-da the novel idea of a do-over on the IWR vote.

They all should have listened to Robert Byrd:

"If we are going to make it a blank check, let's make it a blank check right upfront, without all of these flowery figleaves of 'whereas' clauses, and simply say that the President has this power. Give it to him and we will put up a sign on the top of this Capitol: 'Out of business.' Gone home. 'Gone fishing.' Put up a sign: 'We are out of it. We are out of business. We, here in the Congress, are out of business,' may I say to my friend."

They should have heeded his words back in 2002, back when it mattered ... before so many lives were lost or otherwise forever changed, before so much money (that could have been better spent on domestic issues) was squandered, before all the good faith/world standing was destroyed.

So, God forgive me, but it's a mighty struggle for me to forgive HRC or any of them for that fateful vote in 2002 because the mess we're in now was predicted, predictable and DID NOT HAVE TO HAPPEN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Will she denounce free trade and corporate influence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm not voting for any IWR voter in the primary
If that's what you mean by forgiveness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. No. Her lack of judgement disqualified her
for higher office under any circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. I never blamed her
or any of the other Democrats who voted for the IWR.

I also never thought the IWR was the blank check that so many on DU want it to be...


This is Bush and the Republican's war.

Period.

----------------

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingofNewOrleans Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Bingo eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. More easily in the GE
I'm voting for whoever the Dem nominee is. If this current effort comes to anything, it will be much easier for me to vote for her in 11/07.

I still fear that if she is our candidate the wingers will turn out in record numbers....people are more inclined to come out and vote against something than for something.

Still this legislation would make a difference for me. A positive one.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. This makes no sense. She knows that Bush will just veto this bill.
All the Congressional power to reign in control from Bush lies in the war funding bill(s). Anything else is just photo-op BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC