Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC News to cherrypick Democrats from 1000 DC escort service users?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:44 AM
Original message
ABC News to cherrypick Democrats from 1000 DC escort service users?
Edited on Thu May-03-07 10:46 AM by antiimperialist
Rawstory reports that ABC News will only out on Friday 2 of the about 1000 said to have ties to the now famous Madam from DC.
Given the history of anti-Democratic reporting by ABC (see path to 9-11, fake news about WMD found by Santorum, etc.) It would be safe to assume that ABC will cherry-pick at least a prominent Democrat even if a vast majority of these 1000 are Republicans, in order to hurt the Democratic Party.

What do you think?

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/ABC_Ids_1000_names_from_DC_0503.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'd give it about 99.99999 to 1 odds that they'll do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. ABC did out Tobias, recall
not a democrat. If there is a prominent Democrat who is in office now, then yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. They'll likely pick one of each
as though it were a representative sample.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here's wot I posted yestiddy on dat toppik:
They're scouring the list in search of Democratic names so they can portray the whole thing as a bipartisan scandal. As in 9,993 Repugs & 7 Dems. But first they gotta find the 7 Dems, who will then be portrayed as equal in # to the 9993 Repugs. (Come to think of it, that kind of math makes sense in a strange sort of way, as in 1 of us is equal to 1400+ of them).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:49 AM
Original message
Giving it to ABC was just stupid.
Now they can use it for blackmail later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. What basis do you have to think that most clients were Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Nobody would do it with a Republican for free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Any sex worker will tell you that the VAST majority of their clients are Republican.
Edited on Thu May-03-07 02:37 PM by slampoet

And i do mean ANY.

Straight, Gay, legal, illegal, High class or just street level every sex worker has more GOP clients than Dems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. Of course they will, but it won't damage them with Democrats
because nobody in our party has ever claimed to be the moral arbiter of the universe.

It's the HYPOCRISY, not the kinky sex. It always has been.

That's why outing the sanctimonious is so much more delicious.

Maybe enough of a reaction from the pious GOPS will finally cause our party to focus on its own base instead of pandering to theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. DING DING DING! We've never claimed to be perfect so Fuck'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. If our Democrats are using" escorts/prostitutes"....then they
deserve to get "outed". They know what is at stake for the Party...........they rolled the dice at our expense. So Be It.

I don't agree with the "cherry-picking" of ABC. Not at all. Yet, all Democrats in Congress knew they were being watched!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. I agree totally. If you are going to be a Democratic candidate
then keep you nose clean and you pants zipped if it can cause a scandal. Remember the pugs are watching us for any mistake they can exploit. It may not be fair but it is a fact. Think about the Party and our country. We need to win this fight and not lose it by default.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. So, if ABC has the complete list, will it be leaked to the internet?
I find THAT a very interesting and humerous possibility!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. If he can sell the story to the British press the whole story might get out.
The U.S. media panders to power, trading favors. They will self censor some stories for various reasons. The press in the UK is far different. Libel laws are very strict there too, unlike the U.S. If the UK press publishes something that is not true they can get sued for libel without the plaintiff needing to prove "actual malice".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. And you believe Rawstory?
Hmmmm???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
13. 'Assuming' adds nothing; we slam MSM for 'assuming'; wait for facts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. Oh for fuck's sake.
Let's see... they're doing a good job of protecting the Republicans so far. Just ask Randall Tobias
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. If someone does something like this and gets caught, then they
deserve what they get.

Doesn't matter which party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. Most likely that will happen.
Edited on Thu May-03-07 12:00 PM by AX10
On the other hand, the Democrats never claimed to be the Puritans which the GOP historically has claimed to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC