Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark: "The Reagan Era is Over"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:46 PM
Original message
Clark: "The Reagan Era is Over"
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 11:49 PM by WillyBrandt
"It needs to be called and finished."

What a fucking guy! On Charlie Rose. To be followed by Ed Gillespie, RNC chair.

Ed's on. What a fuck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you have a line? God Bless Him.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. I love it! That was a great appearance by Clark, as usual.
Wes is still the best. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. That was a good appearance
He reallt does seem like a great guy. Wish he'd had more of a chance to show that side of him on teevee.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I liked Clark when he was a CNN commentator
I was very impressed with him.

He's extremely intelligent esp on foreign policy and the middle east in particular.

Maybe the man is too good for the whole politics biz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree with you Carni. That's when he got my attention.
Unfortunately, he didn't have any political campaign experience and it showed in his early campaign speeches. The public speaking seemed forced vs. his TV commentary. No doubt, he got better at it, but it was too late.

It's amazing how much more comfortable he seems since announcing his pullout.

He was my candidate and I don't think he is going to fade away. There's still a great role for Clark in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I TOTALLY AGREE!
I watched him in the debates and thought who the hell IS this man?

The difference is night and day between the campaigning Clark and the at ease Clark- not sure what does that to candidates but it definitely comes into play somehow!

I think Clark would make an excellent Sec of State...his talents in foreign affairs IMO would be wasted in the VP role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RafterMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great appearance
I loved the bit in the middle where he and Charlie were lauhing about the strange ritualism of the process. Wes' attitude was great -- not a trace of the embittered loser.

I still have a trace of the embittered loser, but I'll get over it. Sigh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nancyharris Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. Odd thing for someone to say
who actually voted for Reagan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The Clark-bashing never ever ever stops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fromadam Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Why do you say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nancyharris Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:58 AM
Original message
Because
it is astoundingly hypocritical for him to declare the “end to the Reagan era” when he himself was a Reagan supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. Not at all hypocritical
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 01:02 AM by andym
He was admitting he and others who voted for Reagan were wrong. And I find it gratifying every time I hear someone who voted for Reagan admit it was a mistake :) It means there is hope for the future of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
20. Gimme a break.
A Reagan "supporter"?

Thousands of people voted for Reagan who would not be characterized as Reagan supporters.

Do you remember the Carter years? He's a great hero to me, but I don't fault anyone for not voting for him. He was an ineffective president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
21. Come back with this
after you look up the meaning of the word 'hypocritical.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fromadam Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
26. It's not hypocritical in the least
perhaps you don't really understand what "hypocrisy" is?

btw, I don't know that it is accurate to label someone a "Reagan supporter" when all you know about their support of Reagan is that they voted for him 20 years ago. That just seems an odd thing to say, do you know something more about Clark's involvement with Reagan? Or are you engaging in a bit of dramatic hyperbole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
30. Please explain the hypocrisy
You're suggesting, by using the word "hypocrisy" that Clark still is a "Republican Reaganite" who "falsely" declares the end of the Reagan era.

Care to elaborate?

Actually, nevermind - I think I nailed it already.

But the word you should have been looking for, instead, is "courageous." Now that would have been far more effective - and a more stealthy way of calling Wes Clark a Republican Reaganite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Reagan and Hypocrisy
And I think that now is a good time to remind everyone that Reagan was a longtime Democrat who refused to become a Repug until the Bloomingdales and Nancy twisted his arm. I think it ironic that the Prez the Repugs admire most was actually originally a Dem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. His saracat!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. Hi fromadam!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Kucinich's abortion position is odd too
right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politick Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. You're right
there is that ONE issue to hold against Kucinich. (sound of wind blowing across a deserted country road. A single tumbleweed bounces across the horizon)

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nancyharris Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Most
definitely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayleybeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Excuse me but I am someone who once "actually voted for Reagan" too
and I have since seen the light. I don't think this makes me any less of a Democrat. Nor does it make Wes Clark any less of a Democrat. People change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nancyharris Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Of course people change
But if this is indeed the “end of the Reagan era” it certainly had nothing to do with anything he did. His ability to influence the Democratic Party (much less the general public) was miniscule. He lasted all of 4 weeks in the Democratic nomination race once the voting started. He is a good man and certainly deserves respect for his service to the country, but he deserves no credit for changing the Party much less ending the Reagan era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Hatred, pixelized
Well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nancyharris Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. It is not the lest bit hatred
It is simply the facts. Ignore them if you choose but 4 weeks from now he will have as much influence on the Party as Carol Braun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Now you're attacking Carol?
Excuse me, but I've heard Dean and Kerry use Carol's expressions.

I've heard candidates use Gephardt's "miserable failure" expression.

I've heard them use Clark's "reckless and wrong" expression too.

It sure sounds like Carol, Dick, and Wes had an influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. He did more in his "four short weeks'
than the candidates running or the Dem party did in the last 4years. thank you Wes Clark and Michael Moore for the AWOL story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayleybeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Who's giving him credit for "ending the Reagan era"??
I believe what Clark said was, "The Reagan era is over". Perhaps I missed something, but I never heard him claim responsibility for "ending the Reagan era". The original poster of this thread didn't claim that either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fromadam Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Exactly
sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. Clark did more for the reputation of the Democratic party than Kucinich
Clark saved Clinton's face during the Balkan Wars.
If Clinton had failed, we would have that to face in subsequent
elections.

Kucinich, though a great liberal thinker, hasn't done anything
that carries such tales.

I love Kucinich, but we need to use reason, not just
surface appearances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tactical Progressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
25. It's odd that you would think it odd
It's silly to think that someone wouldn't reassess policy choices across twenty years time. Why would you believe that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
32. So, I was stupid enough to
vote and support Nixon but I guess I'm not allowed to say it was a big fat stinking mistake, huh??? I would like to meet the perfect person who has never make a mistake, never made the wrong choice or never voted for the wrong person. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
24. Perfect words to end a revolution.
Reaganism has gone too far. To the extent that it got the country more focused on a market-driven economy it was fine, but now the movement that started with Goldwater and reached its acme with Reagan has become a caricature of itself, and 'Reagan conservatism' is being used as a cover for the rolling back of civil rights, positive affirmative action, abortion rights -- all the gains we've made in this country since the 60s.

Someone had to say it, and Clark is the man. I hope he has a chance to do more than say it in the future. I have never been happier to support Clark than I am right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayleybeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Well said, BillyB
I wish I had written what you wrote in this post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tobius Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:40 AM
Original message
what exactly does " the reagan era is over.."mean?
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 02:43 AM by tobius
Clinton's 8 years were the reagan era? Or that the Dem nominee will be in favor of repealing all the tax cuts? or what..?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
29. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
RUN C:\GROVELBOT.EXE

This week is our first quarter 2004 fund drive.
Please take a moment to donate to DU. Thank you
for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC