Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Rediscovers Constitution, Acknowledges Congress Has Oversight Role

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 06:33 PM
Original message
White House Rediscovers Constitution, Acknowledges Congress Has Oversight Role
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/25/constitution-oversight/

White House Rediscovers Constitution, Acknowledges Congress Has Oversight Role

Last month, the White House adopted talking points that reflected a truly radical interpretation of the Constitution: that Congress has no oversight responsibility over the White House. Some sample quotes:

SNOW: Congress doesn’t have any legitimate oversight and responsibilities to the White House.

PERINO: The Congress does not have oversight over the White House.

SNOW: First, the White House is under no compulsion to do anything. The legislative branch doesn’t have oversight.

Today, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino reversed that position:

We understand that the Congress has a role to play, which is oversight over the executive branch. I believe that this administration has been responsive to Congress, as we’ve worked with the new majorities as well, that we’ve been responsive.

Watch her clips back to back at link~

The claim that Congress has no oversight responsibilities is of course plainly false. As the Congressional Research Service states in its Congressional Oversight Manual, “The Constitution grants Congress extensive authority to oversee and investigate executive branch activities.”

As for the White House’s reversal today, it may well be a coordinated political decision. But it seems just as likely that Congress’ oversight responsibilities are so astoundingly obvious that Perino simply forgot her month-old talking points and said what she actually believes to be true.



Transcript:

PERINO: We said, there’s no need to authorize subpoenas, because we have — even though we don’t have any responsibility to you, and you don’t have any specific oversight over the White House, we are willing to have our four officials that you’ve asked for to go up and have an interview with members of Congress — all those details to be worked out — and that we would release documents from here, from the White House, to outside entities. <3/26/07>

***

PERINO: I do think that there is a difference between oversight and overreaching. And we understand that the Congress has a role to play, which is oversight over the executive branch. I believe that this administration has been responsive to Congress, as we’ve worked with the new majorities as well, that we’ve been responsive. But there does come a point where it does start to look like over-reaching. <4/25/07>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I checked to see if this was an Onion story.
That's how bad it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. i thought the same thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. That is true to form...when caught in a lie, lie some more.
Overreaching, indeed not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. hopefully, she aint seen nothing yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC