Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary's statement on Supreme Court abortion ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:08 PM
Original message
Hillary's statement on Supreme Court abortion ruling
"This decision marks a dramatic departure from four decades of Supreme Court rulings that upheld a woman's right to choose and recognized the importance of women's health. Today's decision blatantly defies the Court's recent decision in 2000 striking down a state partial-birth abortion law because of its failure to provide an exception for the health of the mother. As the Supreme Court recognized in Roe v. Wade in 1973, this issue is complex and highly personal; the rights and lives of women must be taken into account. It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights that I warned against when I opposed the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito."

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/blog/view/?id=4167
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you, Senator Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. GReat except she should have said Intact D & C --NOT partial-birth as that
is not even a medical term----it is only used by the RW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. What rodeodance said. Stop using their terminology, Hill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I agree.
It is a misnomer meant to incite opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. deserves a big REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alstephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well written statement. Thanks, Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well said, Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. A very sad day indeed..
when politics have entered the privacy between doctor and female patient.

Thanks, for posting, ElizabethDC and Senator Clinton for your supportive statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Check out Obama's statement
Very good too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Yes, I'm glad they've both spoken out about this
it's so important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mloutre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. "The rights and lives of women must be taken into account." Those of men, too.
Anybody who talks about abortion as though it only impacts women is either deaf, blind, or stupid. Although it is true that many men duck the pregnancy/fatherhood responsibility as soon as it comes up, the majority of them do not. It's a shared decision and a shared heartache that stays with both the almost-mother and the almost-father for the rest of their lives.

I wrote an essay addressing that point from personal experience a little earlier; it's too long to put into a comment, though, so I gave it its own post instead:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x694683

I don't know anyone, man or woman, who ever *wants* to have an abortion. For some, though, it's the only alternative at the time. That's why it needs to be safe, rare, AND legal. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Excellent post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I used to be married to one who WANTED me to have an abortion.
We were married. Had been for a few months. The minute I told him I was pregnant he told me to get an abortion. I went into shock and told him if he didn't like it he could leave. And I sat there and cried for the next three hours.

That child is now grown and the light of my life. He hit me up for child support for many years when I had no money, and couldn't find a job, to punish me for having the child anyway. Later he said I "trapped" him. That's kinda hard to do when you're already married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. You got stats on that?
the majority of them do not.

I've just come from reading your remarkable personal account, for which I salute you. But please -- don't make like this isn't MOSTLY an issue affecting women. Just don't. You're to be commended for your participation and support, but you really don't know what other women routinely go through or how common your own involvement really is (clue: not much).

And I'll also take exception to this, as well:
That's why it needs to be safe, rare, AND legal. Period.

No, it needs to be nobody else's goddamned business. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. You must be joking
Edited on Thu Apr-19-07 06:49 AM by Donald Ian Rankin
You cannot seriously be claiming that more than 50% of men "duck the pregnancy/fatherhood responsibility as soon as it comes up"?

I doubt there *are* any stats on that, for the same reason that nobody has ever bothered to gather stats on whether or not grass is green.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Not joking at ALL. Let me put it this way
There's a better chance I'm right than the bloke who posted this nonsense:

Although it is true that many men duck the pregnancy/fatherhood responsibility as soon as it comes up, the majority of them do not.

I'm talking about for unplanned, crisis pregnancies. In most marriages, no -- I would think most men are fine, tho some are definitely not (women who are victims of spousal abuse are at more risk when they're pregnant which seems to make their abusing mates more likely to beat them and kick them in the belly and stuff).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Thank you. Abortion, none of anyone else's business. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. I am all for packing the Supreme Court in 2009. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. Oh, yeah.
I've been thinking this since '04. First order of business for the next president is fix that shit. It's irrepairably broken and needs to be completely overhauled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. In 2009 all the amendments to the United States Code enacted
after January 20, 2001 should be repealed. Just one single act of Congress repealing everything done under BushCo. Then pack the Supreme Court and put all the federal judges appointed by Bush in charge of scheduling cases for the real judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Umm, I kinda like McCain/Feingold...
The national do-not-call registry is kinda nice too.

But yea we can get rid of the rest of it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. K & R for Mrs. Clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
19. You go, Hillary.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
20. That's our most "conservative" Democratic candidate, and even she opposed Alito and Roberts
and would most likely never think of appointing right wing justices to the Supreme Court. Then you have Rudy Guiliani, the most "liberal" Republican, saying that he intends on stacking the Court with Alito-Roberts-type justices. The real pro-choice people will be voting for the Democratic nominee in 2008. That's the bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
21. This is why I'd still vote for her if she won the nomination...
Things like this are far too important for anyone to sit this one out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
27. Here's a list of the dirty bastards
who voted with the pukes to cut off the fillibuster:

Akaka (HI), Baucus (MT), Bingaman (NM), Byrd (WV), Cantwell (WA), Carper (DE), Conrad (ND), Dorgan (ND), Inouye (HI), Johnson (SD), Kohl (WI), Landrieu (LA), Lieberman (CT), Lincoln (AR), Nelson (FL), Nelson (NE), Pryor (AR), Rockefeller (WV), Salazar (CO)

May they all rot in hell...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC