Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney reveals what it's all about: Refighting the Vietnam war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:22 PM
Original message
Cheney reveals what it's all about: Refighting the Vietnam war
http://consortiumnews.com/2007/041607.html

On April 13, in a speech to the Heritage Foundation, Vice President Cheney took an even tougher line calling the Democratic-backed war funding bill “irresponsible” and dressing down the Democratic congressional leadership in especially harsh terms.

“Although the current political environment in our country carries echoes of the hard left in the early ‘70s, America will not again play out those old scenes of abandonment, and retreat, and regret,” Cheney said. “Not this time, not on our watch. … We will press on in this mission, and we will turn events towards victory.”


I think Cheney and the other chickenhawks have never gotten over the Vietnam war. They believe that if only we'd stayed in Vietnam longer, bombed it more ruthlessly, and not "lost our resolve," we would have won. They view Iraq as a chance to "redo" that war and restore America's pride. Of course, most people who think that way, like Cheney, never stepped foot in Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. The worst and the dumbest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, yes, we want to listen to Mr. Five Deferments. Duh! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. It amazes me that he has the audacity to even mention VietNam.
The war that he got 5 deferments to avoid. He ought to be ashamed....but there's a lot of money to be made and Dick is a world-class war profiteer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Their audacity comes from knowing they control most mainstream newsmedia outlets.
Owning most media gives chickenhawks like Cheney PLENTY of faux courage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey Dick, you did abandon the Vietnamese and the
Americans who served and died in Vietnam.

Remember you had other prioritis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. cheney is a real dumb,f***-always has been, now he's rich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MAGICBULLET Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. ok dick
keep bombing and build more prisons, that is what you consider victory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Spoken like the true believer idiot fascist that he is! What a bastard
....covering his own guilt about saving his sorry ass with the five deferments he used to get out of his obligation to serve and fight during the Vietnam War. Cheney's phony rhetoric no longer holds water except with other phony chickenhawks :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not on his watch? That would be easy to fix. Either *ss and him
could just pack up and get out or we could impeach them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't agree with your claim they got over the Vietnam war.
After all, why would amongst other people, President Bush go over there to sell to the Vietnamese jobs and improve their economy?

"Hi enemy. It's us again! This time we'll give you jobs, not bombs!" Doesn't sound right.

Besides, with what you say, if they aren't "over" Vietnam, why aren't they dropping bombs on it rather than Iraq?

I don't think Vietnam is the issue and I think they're over the past.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. What I meant was our *defeat* in the Vietnam war
Not Vietnam per se. The lesson they learned was that we only lost that war because we lost our resolve to win (not because the war was unwinnable). They are applying that lesson to the Iraq war now, which is why they constantly talk about the need to "maintain our resolve."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. How often do the press call him on it? Or have they ever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. They've all read Lewis Sorley's "A Better War"
Petraeus based a paper he wrote on the conclusions in the book as well....and he co-authored a field manual on the same thinking

http://www.answers.com/topic/david-petraeus

And they all believe American changed for the worse during and after Vietnam ("hippies",anti-war protests, those Leave it to Beaver & Donna Reed days - that never really existed - all gone)

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/20/opinion/main2587372.shtml

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/03/AR2005110301971.html

I've mentioned this a time or 12 on DU before
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kellogg, Brown and Root, which made $$ from Vietnam, is now Halliburton.
Small wonder he wants to re-enact the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. who cares what he has to say?
he`s finding out just what out of power means,hell even the Mormons do`t want his sorry ass. he`ll be remembered as the vice president of one of the worse presidencies in our history. nice legacy dick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Viet Nam was fucked up without Cheney and Bu$h.
Iraq is fucked up with Cheney and Bu$h. What is Dick's point?


Check Six, MoFo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Apparantly 50,000 + lives was not enough for this crimanl
He believes we should have stayed in Vietnam so the US casualty rate could have been higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. Commander AWOL & Chickenhawk Cheney
What a pair. I wouldn't follow them to a free lunch, never mind a war (which neither knows anything about, other than the dimension of Profiteering from munitions and oil).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
19. Um, he didn't fight the Viet Nam war
mainly because he is a craven coward who is afraid to face hard questions, let alone hostile machine gun fire. the people are onto you Dick. All of your long-range bloviating and name-calling are doing nothing but pushing your approval rating down toward your blood alcohol level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
20. He should be made to watch the deleted scene from "We Were Soldiers" Where in an interview
A must-see movie on DVD if not for one of the deleted scenes where Mel Gibson's character (Lt. Col. Hal Moore) is talking to Westmoreland and McNamara after the engagement. McNamara and Westmoreland were congradulating Lt. Col. Moore about his unit's performance during the battle. Lt. Col. Moore reads to them a letter taken off the body of a fallen NVA soldier to his sweetheart back home. The letter states that they were there, fighting and suffering, to protect their country from the invading forces. Lt. Col. Moore tells McNamara and Westmoreland that if the North Vietnamese are motivated enough to leave their families and loved ones behind to suffer and fight the US forces in South Vietnam, they will never be able to defeat the North Vietnamese. More prophetic words were never spoken.
http://web.archive.org/web/20021013181055/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
21. Even if we won in Vietnam
What difference would it have made in the geopolitical scene? I'd say not much. The reason that Vietnam is such a sore point with Republicans is because it removed the aura of invincibility surrounding the United States. They need this image as a security blanket, sort of like "my daddy can beat up your daddy", but on a much larger scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC