Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judiciary Committee (Conyers) To Interview Paulose, Others

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 08:58 PM
Original message
Judiciary Committee (Conyers) To Interview Paulose, Others
http://wcco.com/local/local_story_106203300.html

Judiciary Committee To Interview Paulose, Others

(AP) Minneapolis
The House Judiciary Committee wants to interview U.S. Attorney for Minnesota Rachel Paulose as it continues its investigation into the firings of eight federal prosecutors.

Rep. John Conyers Jr., chairman of the committee, said he wants to interview Paulose and others based on an initial round of interviews and on a review of documents released by the Department of Justice. The request was made in a Monday letter to Acting Assistant Attorney General Richard Hertling.

"In our continuing effort to determine the truth behind these firings, we believe that these future interviews will also provide information which we may not already have but that is critical to our investigation nonetheless," the letter said.

Conyers, D-Mich., said in the letter that the interviews would be voluntary.

A spokeswoman for Paulose could not be reached for comment after regular business hours Monday.

Paulose, who had served as a top Justice Department counsel and special assistant to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, was appointed interim U.S. attorney in Minnesota in March 2006. Her predecessor was not among the eight fired U.S. attorneys, but critics have suggested her appointment was an example of political cronyism.

This month, three lawyers in Paulose's office resigned from their top management posts, amid questions about the 34-year-old's management style and experience.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wish he could fire her ass, no body but the stupid right wing
nut coleman wanted her anyway....But thank goodness we can use this to use against him to vote him out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Coleman is now disenchanted, too:

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/11/coleman-paulose /

Sen. Coleman Now Backtracking From U.S. Attorney He Once Championed

colemangreen.jpg In 2006, Sen. Norm Coleman (R-MN) championed the nomination of Rachel Paulose to U.S. attorney in Minnesota. Last week, four top staffers to Paulose voluntarily demoted themselves in protest of Paulose’s “highly dictatorial style” of managing. Immediately after the resignations, Coleman’s office issued a statement of unqualified support for Paulose:

Rachel Paulose was nominated to be U.S. Attorney based solely on her exemplary qualifications and experience. She was confirmed with the bipartisan support of Senator Coleman, former Senator Dayton, and the entire United States Senate. She replaced someone who resigned, not someone who was fired, and her nomination should not be confused with the current controversy over the recent dismissal of several U.S. attorneys in other jurisdictions.

But a look at Paulose’s background indicates that she was handpicked by the Justice Department because of her personal connections, rather than her professional qualifications. “She was a special assistant to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, worked as a senior counsel for deputy attorney general Paul McNulty and is best buds with Monica Goodling.”

With the national media now highlighting the Paulose case, Coleman is backing away from his previous statements of support, saying that Paulose needs to explain her situation “given the recent issues related to the U.S. attorneys nationwide.” In a letter to Paulose he wrote:

As you know, your confirmation to be U.S. attorney enjoyed bipartisan support and was unanimously confirmed by the Senate because of your outstanding qualifications. At the same time, there are clearly managerial issues that need to be acknowledged and rectified. … Given recent issues related to U.S. attorneys nationwide that have now extended to your own position, I urge you to take immediate action to shed light on the resignations and address the concerns which have been raised relative to your management skills.

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) has called on Congress to look into the case, and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) has written to the Justice Department requesting information that shows “any political pressure by the Justice Department or White House.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mr. Biskupic goes to Washington
That should be a fun day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Absolutely, Patsy!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. when he goes, he better bring all documents and email relating to his retention & the Thompson case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yep
I wanna hear about all of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Some Biskupic background from Laughing Coyote's awesome Email Gate thread
here's just a bit of the mess we have in Wisconsin involving USA Biskupic et al
(give this cross-post a bit of time to load because the parent thread is monumental for researchers and Laughing Coyote deserves our appreciation for his work)

"Various WI media reporting Biskupic as stating that Gonzales questioned..."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x523978#657415
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oddly, I'd have thought the story would have had another
bit of info after this sentence:

"Paulose, who had served as a top Justice Department counsel and special assistant to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, was appointed interim U.S. attorney in Minnesota in March 2006."

Something to the effect that the Senate confirmed her (even though the Senate Judiciary Committee didn't approve it) in 12/06. The story makes it sound like she's one of the US attorney's that were appointed without Senate confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Freepers everywhere wonder why he can't just walk down to the speaker's office and talk.
Edited on Tue Apr-17-07 08:40 PM by hootinholler
I mean why would he need to invite Pelosi for an interview.

Odd mood tonight, must be the trolls.

-Hoot

Jesus Christ on a trailer hitch,, I just mis-spelled Pelosi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC