Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Need for 'czar' shows chaos of war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:30 PM
Original message
Need for 'czar' shows chaos of war
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/311571_mcfeatters15.html

Need for 'czar' shows chaos of war

By ANN MCFEATTERS
GUEST COLUMNIST

snip//

The Decider, as Bush confidently called himself, to the delight of comedians everywhere, is supposed to be the commander in chief, especially since he fired the generals on the ground who disagreed with him about how the war was going. In truth, it has been Vice President Dick Cheney who has been -- and still is -- calling the shots in this appallingly misguided war, especially with the departure of his soul buddy, former defense chief Donald Rumsfeld. Now even Cheney is flummoxed about how to get out of one of the most stupendous messes in U.S. history.

With stunning chutzpah, the White House is suggesting that the war has been guided by a mid-level bureaucrat named Meghan O'Sullivan, who has toiled for Bush in near obscurity in the National Security Council, first under Condoleezza Rice and now under Stephen Hadley, who also wants out.

O'Sullivan is leaving her job, and, the White House says, that opens the door to replacing her with someone who would "oversee" the war on a much broader scale. Such a person would have the power to dictate to all kinds of government agencies. (Is there some kind of new constitutional crisis arising here?)

This is amazingly surreal (yes, I know I'm blowing a year's worth of adjectives) for a democracy where we're not supposed to have "war czars" who have unspecified powers over life and death.

While Bush gives speech after speech insisting the war is going OK, if not well, and paving the way toward democracy in the Middle East and giving terrorists everywhere nightmares (all evidence to the contrary), the pursuit of a war overseer is proof enough the White House policy is in total chaos.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Seems like if we have a "war czar" we can only look
forward to war without end. Does congress get to approve this??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Blame Czar? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. O'Sullivan got her start
working for Paul Bremer and the Provisional Authority in Baghdad. According to George Packer in The Assassin's Gate, to Meghanize a problem meant papering over your mistakes with a powerpoint presentation. Sounds like a skill much in demand around the White House. She will be missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. John Oliver on The Daily Show had the best line of all.
This is a critical time in the conflict. One that calls for a strong leader. And what better title for that leader than one evoking an ineffectual, tyrannical dynasty ultimately slaughtered by Communists in a filthy basement deep in the Ural Mountains? It's a morale booster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. i think it is proof Bu$h's medication isnt working....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC