Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sorry George, but the President does not get a "stunt double"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:17 PM
Original message
Sorry George, but the President does not get a "stunt double"
We already have a "war czar" - he's called the President.

How is it that George Bush wants to be the "commander-in-chief" and be a "war President" but believes that he needs a "war czar"?

Does that not stretch credulity?

As Jon Stewart basically said last night, "war czar" is Russian for "someone to fall on my sword". The "war czar" will be responsible for taking the blame while George Bush gets to pretend that nothing is his fault.

Any time I've ever heard the word "czar" uttered by our government what it has meant is that the people in charge don't have a damned clue how to deal with a problem so they choose to isolate the responsibility to one guy who gets to take the hit when the problem still isn't fixed.

Every general asked to serve as "war czar" so far has declined because they aren't as dumb as Bush thinks they are.

How long ago did we get a "drug war czar"?

Have we "won" the "war on drugs" yet?

We even created a czar in the form of director of "homeland security" after 9/11 to give Bush someone to blame if it ever happened again. That clearly didn't work given Hurricane Katrina. In reality FEWER bureaucratic layers are needed between the field and the Oval Office, not more and that's what we learned from the Presidents failures during Hurricane Katrina.

Any time we declare a "war" on an abstract noun - poverty, energy, drugs, or terrorism - we've never really succeeded because you can't. How do you make an abstract noun "surrender"? You have to DECLARE war and war should only be declared on real world entities, not abstract ideas.

Congress has not authorized any new "war on terror czars" and would have to do so under its authority to regulate the military.

The President does not get a stunt double to take the blame for HIS malfeasance and incompetence.

Either BE the leader you think you are Mr. President, or resign.

Doug D.
Orlando, FL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. stunt double...love it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whith Rummy gone
there's no one to blame for Shrub's tragically flawed stratagy.
Quick hire a new whipping boy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, I see a photoshop coming on.
At least a cartoon.

Bush is a puppet. The War Czar is Bush's puppet. So one puppet says to the other, "It's YOUR fault".

We could have a War czar's war czar, ad infinitem. "It's your fault, it's your fault, it's your fault..."


We didn't need one puppet. And I think one puppet is maximum.

Let's limit the administration to only one puppet per term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. czar + war, what's not to like. Great post.
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC