Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Leads in South Carolina (Obama 34 / Clinton 20 / Edwards 17)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:07 PM
Original message
Obama Leads in South Carolina (Obama 34 / Clinton 20 / Edwards 17)
Edited on Tue Apr-10-07 05:09 PM by Pirate Smile
Obama Leads in South Carolina

An InsiderAdvantage poll finds Sen. Barack Obama (IL) leading the other Democrats in South Carolina with 34% of the vote. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) placed second at 20% and former Sen. John Edwards was third at 17%.

http://politicalinsider.com/2007/04/obama_leads_in_south_carolina.html


I found an article on the poll:


Obama Gains, But Can He Maintain?
By Lee Bandy
SouthCarolinaInsider

(4/10/07) U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has rocketed to the top of the field of contenders for the South Carolina Democratic presidential primary crown, leaving the candidacy of New York Sen. Hillary Clinton in a cloud of dust.
The news stunned political experts and pundits.

“Obama has started a brush fire across the country” that Clinton may find difficult to quench, said Francis Marion University polit1ical scientist Neal Thigpen.
“Obama clearly has got momentum,” said Winthrop University professor Scott Huffmon.

The Illinois senator’s showing represents a complete turnaround for Obama who trailed in earlier South Carolina surveys.
Today, Obama holds a comfortable lead in South Carolina, according to a new telephone poll.
He leads with 34 percent of the Democratic primary vote, followed by Clinton with 20 percent.

What is worrisome for the Clinton campaign is that she is in danger of slipping into third place in South Carolina. The poll shows that former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards is only three percentage points away from overtaking Clinton.

http://www.insidersc.com/restricted/2007/April%2007/4-10-07/bandy.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama's winning in SC?
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. don't be shocked
Edited on Tue Apr-10-07 05:16 PM by CountAllVotes
I know of MANY UNSUSPECTING persons out there that are thinking about "voting for this guy", and that includes ME! :toast:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well, we are talking about the Democrats in South Carolina
so I don't find it all that shocking. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Shew, I forgot about that part
My heart rate can go down now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NormanYorkstein Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. why would that surprise anyone?
Seriously why is it a surprise that Obama is polling well among Democrats in SC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. The state does have a high percentage of African American voters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. I didn't read the original post all the way
I forgot we we're talking about the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. ABH
Anybody But Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. ABC rolls off the tongue a little better. But ABH is good too.
I am definitely for
Anyone
But
Clinton
in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NormanYorkstein Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. oh yeah - Schweitzer rocks!
just saw your tag line, I'll sign the petition. Schweitzer would be great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Sounds good to me too! And she has no one to blame but herself!
Had Hillary come out against the war in Iraq, as Russ Feingold did, she would be today the prohibited favorite to win the nomination, leading all the polls by comfortable margins.

Her record on the war, her long history of triangulating and vacillating on core issues, is why Hillary's support is soft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. That is No Small Lead
especially consdering that Edwards being from NC is close to being a favorite son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree, plus the Bill Clinton factor on behalf of HRC
This poll is bad news for HRC and Edwards, at least in SC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. No this is good for Edwards and not bad for Clinton either.
Edited on Thu Apr-12-07 08:13 AM by w4rma
The South Carolina Democratic primary will be about 50% African American. Obama has lost ground in SC.

(oops I had gotten this older thread/poll mixed up with the new one in post 26.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. WALOC = What a Load of Crap!
Edited on Tue Apr-10-07 05:31 PM by The Sushi Bandit
Bogus poll that is self serving someones political agenda.

Where is Kucinich and Gore's numbers???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. THAT'S why the poll is "crap"?
Because Kucinich and Gore aren't included? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Gore's not running and, well... Kucinich... you know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. do you mean "has more creditability than Obama?"
Kucinich certainly does!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. No, I meant Kucinich doesn't have a chance in hell of becoming president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. and his inclusion in a poll is immaterial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Obama will win Iowa and South Carolina.
Hillary will finish third in both states and that will effectively be the end of her campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. From your lips to God's ears...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. I would not count Edwards out of SC--yet. Remember, he won
SC last time around. He is a native of SC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. That's why this is a two-way race between Edwards and Obama.
Hillary has no chance. The national media is clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. Only 500 people polled
Isn't that a rather small amount? No mention of MOE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
25. What was the margin of error?
I didn't see much specifics about the poll...with polls, I look at the MoE...if it's not there, it's balogna without the mayo...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
26. Not anymore - Poll puts Giuliani, Clinton in lead in SC
Among the likely Democratic voters, Hillary Clinton is on top, with 32 percent. Barack Obama is second with 23 percent and John Edwards has 21 percent.

http://www.wistv.com/Global/story.asp?S=6358431
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC