|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
a_random_joel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:14 PM Original message |
Why would Clark drop out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_Dawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. Because Clark never said it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. he won't be silent on this if they attribute it to him in the"real" press |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewagner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. Makes no sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. Clark isn't the source, ABC, TIME and others were already working on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DakotaDemocrat (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Yep... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. I think your analysis makes sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. here's my theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
a_random_joel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Yeah, but IF it's true and he knew in advance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Slinkerwink may have somethin here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bad Thoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. If Clark knew ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xray s (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. The three reporters breaking this "off the record" comment worked for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Ahhhh, No. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. Why in the world would you believe Drudge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
12. The woman's friend contacted a reporte last year see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
a_random_joel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. So then this is pretty much he said-she said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Linda Tripp maybe?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 02:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. The more I think of it, the more I think the Clark staffers were a bunch.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Dunham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
16. Wes Clark Is a Good Man Who Would NOT Say This |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
18. He is being smeared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
19. Using Democrat as "Source" or "Channel" for propaganda is Old Ploy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HoosierClarkie (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-04 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
22. It sounds like divide and conquer to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC