Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reality check: Drudge, Accuracy, and Bill Clinton's "Love Child"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:49 PM
Original message
Reality check: Drudge, Accuracy, and Bill Clinton's "Love Child"
I think the allegations of Kerry infidelity would have been saved for later if true. Maybe I'm wrong, but Drudge has been known to wander some distance from the truth in his efforts to take down Democrats. Case in point: the Love Child of Bill Clinton. Widely reported, proven false, quickly forgotten by the guilty parties in the press. As usual, the Daily Howler reminds us what really happened.

http://www.dailyhowler.com/h011399_1.shtml

Life in this celebrity press corps: Accepting the lies that blind

<edit>

But we were struck throughout by the tepid way the group critiqued what had happened. Here’s a list of things no one ever said in the course of the lengthy discussion:

1/ No one ever said what is now plainly true: the accuser had lied to the public.

2. No one ever said, or lamented the fact, that Bill Clinton had been lied about.

3. No one criticized Matt Drudge by name for pushing his latest imbecile story.

4. No one asked how news of the DNA testing got from the Star to Drudge. No one wondered if Star editor Phil Bunton had been guilty of spreading the slander. (In fact, the Star was complimented. See below.)

5. No one mentioned the New York Post, or criticized it for putting this “story” on page one (January 3).

6. The Washington Times was barely mentioned, and never directly condemned, for doing its own page one story.

7. No one mentioned that Woodruff’s “woman” was actually a prostitute, Bobbi Ann Williams, reportedly paid “in the low six figures” by the Star (Washington Times). This might have helped viewers see how absurd it was that any paper had reported her charges.

8. No one named the individual journalists who had pimped this disgraceful slander. For example, no one mentioned the shameful work of Woody West of the Washington Times. (See tomorrow’s DAILY HOWLER.)

more....





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Druge also broke the Clinton/Monica story
as you'll recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. you know what they say about that broken clock....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every once in a while.
Drudge is like a psychic. People only remember his successes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheMorans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. thank you!
and the sensationalism over Drudge's unfounded allegations on DU is incredible, it seems like many people WANT to believe it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I have said consistently that Kerry's reported infidelity
was one of the main reasons I did not trust him.

I agree that a man who will lie to his wife for sex will lie to anyone to get anything - especially power and money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curlyred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good point
It's interesting how quickly people just love to believe the worst, isn't it?

It's also interesting that when Drudge is criticizing the Shrub, he's a hero, but if he breaks trash about a democrat, he's a jerk.

Look at this front page today, if you can stand it, and you will see plenty of teasers about Bush too.

Drudge panders to our gossip lust, that's the bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC