Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh My God!? Could Iran Hate Britain More?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tecelote Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 04:55 PM
Original message
Oh My God!? Could Iran Hate Britain More?
Iranian channel plans to broadcast "confessions" from seized ...

Link: One News Story From Canada

Google News: http://news.google.com/?ncl=1115008810&hl=en">More News Stories
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I suppose they could kill them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tecelote Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. The reason they did not is that Iran is trying to get attention, not revenge.
Unpopular opinion - Iran is not an "axis of evil".

They are a nation of people.

They should be treated with respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smitty Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Respect is a two-way street. The British soldiers should be
released immediately and not used a bargaining chips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. "They are a nation of people" is misleading, when it comes to politics.
The Iranian people have relatively little influence on the direction of the Iranian state. The Iranian people deserve as much respect as any other, but the Iranian government does not deserve any respect whatsoever.

In many ways, it would be more accurate to say "Council of Guardians seizes soldiers".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Call that humiliation?
Call that humiliation?

No hoods. No electric shocks. No beatings. These Iranians clearly are a very uncivilised bunch

Terry Jones
Saturday March 31, 2007
The Guardian

http://www.netscape.com/viewstory/2007/03/31/guardian-unlimited-comment-is-free-call-that-humiliation-terry-jones/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guardian.co.uk%2Fcommentisfree%2Fstory%2F0%2C%2C2047128%2C00.html&frame=true

"I share the outrage expressed in the British press over the treatment of our naval personnel accused by Iran of illegally entering their waters. It is a disgrace. We would never dream of treating captives like this - allowing them to smoke cigarettes, for example, even though it has been proven that smoking kills. And as for compelling poor servicewoman Faye Turney to wear a black headscarf, and then allowing the picture to be posted around the world - have the Iranians no concept of civilised behaviour? For God's sake, what's wrong with putting a bag over her head? That's what we do with the Muslims we capture: we put bags over their heads, so it's hard to breathe. Then it's perfectly acceptable to take photographs of them and circulate them to the press because the captives can't be recognised and humiliated in the way these unfortunate British service people are.

It is also unacceptable that these British captives should be made to talk on television and say things that they may regret later. If the Iranians put duct tape over their mouths, like we do to our captives, they wouldn't be able to talk at all. Of course they'd probably find it even harder to breathe - especially with a bag over their head - but at least they wouldn't be humiliated.

And what's all this about allowing the captives to write letters home saying they are all right? It's time the Iranians fell into line with the rest of the civilised world: they should allow their captives the privacy of solitary confinement. That's one of the many privileges the US grants to its captives in Guantánamo Bay."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. you nailed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tecelote Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Here! Here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC