The best bunch of prosecutors you'd ever want to fire.

[babylonsister]

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002829.php

The best bunch of prosecutors you'd ever want to fire.

I've said it before here, and I'll say it again. One of the remarkable aspects of the U.S. attorney firings is that the Justice Department didn't select a group of mediocre prosecutors and then try to smear them as underperforming -- oh, no. They chose from among the most distinguished U.S. attorneys in the country (by the DoJ's own admission), and then announced to the world that they'd canned them for "performance related" issues.

Let's go down the list, shall we?

New Mexico's David Iglesias, we pointed out yesterday, was considered for a promotion in 2004 to head up the office that oversees all U.S. attorneys. And that wasn't the only promotion for which he was considered. As The Washington Post points out this morning, he was also considered for the position of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia (the crown jewel of the U.S. attorney offices) and U.S. Attorney for Manhattan (another very high profile office -- just ask Rudy Guiliani). And just to clinch it, former Deputy Attorney General James Comey (he left in August of 2005), has called Iglesias "one of our finest and someone I had a lot of confidence in as deputy attorney general."

And then there's Arizona's Paul Charlton. Here's what Comey to say about him (from The Los Angeles Times):

"I considered you a star among U.S. attorneys," Comey told Charlton in . "You ran an office with a staggering caseload, in both numbers and variety, and did it beautifully."

Comey added that he knew of "no performance issues" with Charlton. "In fact, quite the contrary, because you were at the top of your class."

And Seattle's John McKay. Here's Kyle Sampson, Alberto Gonzales' right hand and the point man for the purge, writing about McKay in August, 2006: "re John, it's highly unlikely we could do better in Seattle." (Update: as a reader points out below, this was written in the context of considering McKay for a position as a federal judge in Seattle, but I think it's fair to say the point still applies.)

And then there's the case of Daniel Bogden of Nevada, the one Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty got cold feet about just two days before he was fired ("I'm a little skittish about Bogden"). Even though he was supposedly derelict in his prosecution of obscenity cases, the Justice Department is currently helping him get another position at the DoJ.

Of course, everyone knows how Carol Lam distinguished herself, but despite bringing the highest profile case in the Justice Department's recent history (with the exception of the Abramoff investigation), she doesn't seem to have had any champions inside the Gonzales Justice Department. Funny.

Ed. Note: Thanks to TPM Reader RK for catching the McKay email.

Update: The AP adds more: "Six of the eight U.S. attorneys fired by the Justice Department ranked in the top third among their peers for the number of prosecutions filed last year, according to an analysis of federal records."
Permalink | TOPICS: Must Read: U.S. Attorneys
ADVERTISEMENT:
return to the homepage | post a comment


Comments:

when i first read "by their own admission," i read it as by the admission of the fired attorneys themselves... maybe it's too early in the morning and i just need more coffee...

http://takeitpersonally.blogspot.com/
Posted by: profmarcus
Date: March 21, 2007 09:11 AM

It would be interesting to get a comment out of Ashcroft on the whole scandal. I was struck reading Iglesias' op-ed in this morning Times how Ashcroft had personally stressed to him that he should be non-partisan as a prosecutor.

I think there are a lot of people who are surprised how much they miss Ashcroft (relative to Gonzales, anyway).

Here's the link for Iglesias' op-ed:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/21/opinion/21iglesias.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Posted by: Crust
Date: March 21, 2007 09:21 AM

I'm waiting for the smears of James Comey to start up. It's clear from several things -- his handling of the Plame investigation, his refusal to sign off on illegal wiretapping -- that he was not a "loyal Bushie" but rather someone who took the administration of Justice seriously. He had a decent rep here in NY from his brief stint as Southern District US Attorney, too. And so his praise for these fired USA's could be quite damning -- time for the Rove attack machine to start besmirching his name.
Posted by: Glenn
Date: March 21, 2007 09:21 AM


I suspect that those most skilled at careful reasoning within any profession are also most careful about ethical decision-making within their profession.

Thus, it does not seem by chance that these attorneys at the top of their game were same ones who resisted pressures to behave unethically.

By extension the questionable ethics of our AG suggest to me that his legal skills may also be seriously wanting!
Posted by: TheraP
Date: March 21, 2007 09:28 AM