Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would being VP on ticket help or hurt in 08?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 09:50 PM
Original message
Would being VP on ticket help or hurt in 08?
If Clark takes the sidecar for this fall, and they lose, would that damage him for an 08 run??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. If we loose its Hil in 08.
So it seems moot to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I'll bet you a quarter we'll never see Mrs Clinton run
irrespective of 2004.

Too polarizing a candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. But we will win this time, so no Hil in '08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Hillary can wait until '12.
Edited on Wed Feb-11-04 10:05 PM by Gman
until then she can build on her already great record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'd think it would
realistically we need some big electorial college support for whoever gets the nomination. A warm up as governor would be a good career move for the General if he's interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taeger Donating Member (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Veep is a poor job for general

I'd say that it's Defense Secretary, Secretary of State or Senator for Clark. He'd make a SHITTY VP since he has NO experience on capital hill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think they'd be crazy to run Hillary but to answer the ?
I don't believe they would lose if Clark was on the ticket. He could be Pres in 2012. He'd only be 66.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I honestly wonder if thats too old these days...
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Nah, 60 is the new 40.
Or so I've heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. It sure didn't help Mondale in '84
Who knows what the political climate will be in '08. Little did we know in '00 be we'd stuck in another Viet Nam in '04.

Clark is a military man. Dwight Eisenhauer, Grant, T Roosevelt were all presidents that were military. They all came into office during a time after armed conflicts and while feelings were still high.

However, we'll be in all kinds of armed conflicts by '08 if * wins election so it will be very hard to second guess as a military man after 6 years of armed conflict. Thus I don't think Clark will have the same advantage he has now with an unpopular war after 12 years of no cold war and peace.

Who knows what people will think and feel in '08. But I think, now is/was Clark's best and only chance unless he distinguishes his self in ways separate from the military (e.g. record as a Senator) which is unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2004Donkeys Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. There will be no 08 run
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BL_Zebub Donating Member (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ask Lieberman.
If Kerry's the nominee, the loss will be devastating. Any running mate on the ticket will be damaged for 08.

Even though Gore & Lieberman won in 2000, the results of the coup in Florida damaged Lieberman's credibility as much as his Bush Lite platform did, this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. You'd need to be the VP candidate in 04 in order to run for reelection
in 08. No?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. here's an interesting question . . .
interesting to me, anyhow . . . given that the vice president's job is pretty much undefined and that the president can use him in virtually any capacity he sees fit, would there be any reason why the veep couldn't also be appointed secretary of state? . . . just wonderin' . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. The Senate would never confirm the appointment even if it were
legal, even if there was any reason to do it. From Kerry's point of view there isn't.

You have to realise that Clark is yesterday's news already, and that while Kerry will be happy to have Wes knocking himself out on the campaign, he isn't going to invite him inside the tent.

Very few politicians ever willingly deal with someone who can make them look bad in comparison, and no President likes to think that his VP would be seen as more popular or accomplished than he was.

Bush2000 was different but that was because everyone deluded themselves into thinking that Cheney could keep him in check and prevent him from totally screwing everything up. Nobody seemed to realize that Cheney was just as wacky as Wolfowitz and the rest.

Kerry has a whole list of DLC folks to attend to before he gives a thought to bringing Clark or Edwards on board. Dean is absolutely out of the running, and the rest never were in it for VP anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnitaR Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. This may be a stupid question but...
How long does it usually take for the nominee to announce his choice for VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Usually occurs at the convention. Keeps the carrot in front of
anyone who might be interested to keep them involved in the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnitaR Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
19. Why would he run against the top of the ticket in 08?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC