Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If GOP Sen. Domenici Is Forced Out, Dem Gov. Richardson Would Appoint His Replacement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 02:18 PM
Original message
If GOP Sen. Domenici Is Forced Out, Dem Gov. Richardson Would Appoint His Replacement
http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/03/14/if-domenici-is-forced-out-dem-gov-would-name-replacement/

If GOP Sen. Domenici Is Forced Out, Dem Gov. Richardson Would Appoint His Replacement
Posted by Jon Ponder | Mar. 14, 2007, 8:35 am

The scandal swirling around Pres. Bush’s firing of eight U.S. Attorneys last December could lead to the resignation of Sen. Pete Domenici, R-New Mexico — which could change the dynamics in the Senate by adding another Democrat to the majority.
“Domenici is going to send over names tomorrow (not even waiting for Iglesias’s body to cool).”

David Iglesias, the fired prosecutor from New Mexico, testified to Congress last week that he believes that two New Mexico Republican members of Congress had him fired because he wouldn’t pursue their political opponent. One of the pols was Rep. Heather Wilson. The other was Sen. Domenici:

On the day of the Dec. 7 firings, Miers’s deputy, William Kelley, wrote that Domenici’s chief of staff “is happy as a clam” about Iglesias.

A week later, Sampson wrote: “Domenici is going to send over names tomorrow (not even waiting for Iglesias’s body to cool).”

If Domenici were to step down, his replacement would be named by New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a Democrat, who is running for president in 2008. Assuming the governor would replace Domenici with a Democrat, the balance of power in the Senate would undergo a subtle shift toward the Dems.

The parties are evenly divided now, with 48 Democrats and 48 Republicans, with two independents who both vote with Democrats. But one of those independents, Joe Lieberman, has been leaning Republican lately, especially on the war. The implicit threat that he might switch sides at any moment gives him power over the Democrats that he did not earn.

Upping the ranks of the Dems even by one vote would tend to neutralize Lieberman on issues related to the war, and it would put the Democrats one vote closer to a supermajority of 60 votes on appointments and clotures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yankeeinlouisiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. 98 Senators?
Edited on Wed Mar-14-07 02:24 PM by yankeeinlouisiana
48 (D) + 48 (r) = 96 + 2 (I) = 98

Where are the other two senators?


edit: added party affiliation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe our Dem Senator who is ill was not added in
Sorry, I forget his name right off. But maybe he's not in the count. I don't know about a Republican missing from the total.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeeinlouisiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Tim Johnson? I think that's his name.
After re-reading the article, I think they just made a mistake. I think it's 49 Ds, 49 Rs, and 2 Is voting with the Ds. Tim Johnson should be included in the total even though he's not voting yet.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Maybe they made a boo-boo.
Or their math sucks! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Which is why Domenici will only go kicking and screaming.
They will fight to keep him in the Senate. Richardson's choice, of course, will make or break his candidacy. Not to mention revitalizing the governors whose prerogatives have been crapped on by this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Domenici won't resign, but he'll be vulnerable in 2008
It's only 3 months into the year and already we have another scandal-ridden GOP Senator. At this rate we'll have a filibuster proof Senate in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC