Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gonzales should NOT quit, because...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 05:15 AM
Original message
Gonzales should NOT quit, because...
first, this is probably the worst week the administration has ever had-- on top of the Libby verdict and Walter Reed, the war is still going badly, Zbignew Brezinski is running around giving them an "F" for foreign affairs, Pace ran his big mouth, the mortgage and stock market thing, gas is going up, and Mayabn priests are purifying the defiled ground Shrub walked on, and even the true believers are doubting.

And Gonzo. And it's only Wednmesday morning.

Leahy was pissed when he saw the emails and memos about the attorneys. Really pissed. He said so. And now he's holding hearings-- hearings that could give us the smoking gun for impeachment.

If Gonzo goes, much of the thunder is lost. The White House replaces him with someone palatable, takes credit for solving the problem, and makes it much tougher to pin the problem on Shrub himself when you don't have a sitting AG hauled in front of Congress to explain himself.

Let the White House sit and squirm as Gonzo, his fired help, Karen Hughes, Rove and the rest of them are called in to testify.

Let the show go on as Shrub himself gets called before Congress and is forced to use executive privilege and fight the committee. Let's have the huge public fight over who sees what documents that the4 White House won't want out.

It wasn't bombing Cambodia or the Watergate breakin that got Nixon ousted-- it was just a few minutes of missing tape. It wasn't Whitewater that hooked Clinton, it was a blue dress and a cigar.

Let's keep Gonzo in the job and on the hotseat and find Shrub's "blue dress."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
b_cmh Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Shrub
... LMFAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Welcome to DU
I don't get the LMFAO comment. What are you guffawing at exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Using the term "Shrub" to refer to Bush is standard here
But for others, it may be new, and it is extremely funny. I suspect that's what induced the laughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. yea, i'm so used to it
i forget it may be new to others
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is going to lead to
a major conflict between the WH and the Congress over "Executive Priviledge". You can hear it immediately in the language used by the WH. The mantra of the week is "the US attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President". Clearly they are shwping this as the exective branch dealing with internal personnel matters and that the Congress has no role to play.

Problem is there is the small matter of the Constitution to deal with. While a back door amendment seems to give the Executive the power to appoint replacements for the attorneys without Congressional oversight it was only intended that such power be exercised in a time of national emergency, not as a means of circumventing Congressional oversight.

The Democratic majority is moving immediately to correct the law and the committee chairs are issuing subpeonas which I am sure the executive wil resist.

Gonzo will not go early, they need to keep him under that umbrella of "Executive Priveledge" as long as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. That darn Constitution just keeps getting in the way of the
right wing's plans for this country. It does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. That's cuz them damn Founders were all Secular Humanists!
May they rot in hell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. I want to see them all twist in the wind.
Robspierre never had it this good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. I kind of agree with you...
... my only concern is the Dems just letting it blow over like they have so many other similar events.

But the fact is, for the Bush administration, the resignation of Gonzo would probably be the EASIEST way out. And don't worry, they know that. They can already see, if they have a political brain in their head (and that's the only kind they DO have), that this "they were fired for poor performance" idea isn't going to fly, period.

So they can either fire/resign the guy, or they can twist in the wind as hearing after hearing are held. Isn't it delicious, either way we win something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Know we all know why Chimpy wanted Harriet Meiers on the SCOTUS
He was trying to cover all the bases before all this proverbial shit hit the fan. He needed everybody secure and locked down. Oops. Poor George.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC