Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Attorney John McKay has an interesting question..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Check12 Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 11:52 PM
Original message
US Attorney John McKay has an interesting question..
Edited on Tue Mar-13-07 11:54 PM by Check12
From TPM;

John McKay, the former US Attorney from Washington fired for not pursuing bogus voter fraud indictments, seems to have a knack for cutting to the chase. Says McKay: "My question is, if Gonzales fired the guy who fired us, why is he standing by the dismissals?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good question.
Why doesn't Gonzalas reinstate these people if they've been wronged? Particularly, Carol Lam. Personally, I think they had to fire a cluster to hide the real target (Lam) that they were going after.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's a good question...
My guess is that Gonzales, like so many of Dub's cronies, always places loyalty to his boss over loyalty to the Constitution. And when you've got a boss who once said that the Constitution was "...just a G**damned piece of paper", it really makes sense why routinely trashing it comes as second nature to someone like Gonzales. Anybody who can justify suspending Habeas Corpus, warrantless spying on American citizens and allowing torture of prisoners clearly doesn't have much respect for that "piece of paper". And he also isn't into accepting untimate responsibility for something like this.

I really hope the House, if Nancy Pelosi doesn't want to broach impeaching Dub right now, would at least take a serious look at impeachment of a corrupt, devious idiot like Gonzales. He's as good a place as any to start.

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Check12 Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Someone suggested revoking his law license as a better move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Disbarring him, if he is guilty of perjury, is a great idea. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC