Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox - The Answer To All Of Bush's Scandals?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 02:52 PM
Original message
Fox - The Answer To All Of Bush's Scandals?
Bring Up Clinton Scandals

Jon Scott on Fox News Live (12 - 1 p.m.) had a segment on that said the White House was reeling from the Scooter Libby verdict, the Walter Reed scandal and the firing of judges across the country. Scott asked how would Bush handle all of this. He had Republican strategist, John Hancock and Democratic strategist, Jane Fleming on to discuss it.

Hancock said that the president had responded effectivey to the Walter Reed Hospital scandal and said that the White House would come out of this stronger and ready to lead this nation. (Comment: I think it's a little late for that)

Scott brought up the Sandy Berger story and said how he got off while Scooter Libby might have to spend a few years in jail for being confused per Mary Maitlin.

Jane Fleming said he wasn't confused, that Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and Scooter Libby all knew about this and he had outed an agent. Scott said the outing was done by Richard Armitage and Fleming responded that that was a talking point out there and was absolutely not true. She said the president was wrong in putting out a statement expressing sadness for Libby when he should have put out a statement saying that he condemned his behavior and should have lived up to what he said about firing anyone involved with the leak.

Hancock said that the Democrats had double standards and wondered where the rhetoric was when President Clinton committed perjury and Sandy Berger stuffed documents down his clothes. He went on to say that the president brought in highly qualified people into postions.

Fleming said he didn't bring in the right people with the right knowledge. She said to look at Abu Ghrab, to look at the Walter Reed scandal and that there was scandal after scandal that this White House has to respond to and they don't.

Hancock finished up by saying that the White House had responded effectively.

Comment: This was a situation where Fox explains the current scandals in the White House by bringing up past situations. Jane Fleming did an excellent job staying on point and stating that this White House was responsible for hiring the wrong people and bringing these scandals on themselves.

http://www.newshounds.us/2007/03/07/fox_the_answer_to_all_of_bushs_scandals_bring_up_clinton_scandals.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. They were most definitely the wrong people
but they were who bush wanted, loyal, not competent. hancock could not possibly care less about the Soldiers at Walter Reed or those in Badhdad or any of the lies that bush and his fellow criminals have told. He's just pissed they are getting caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrspeeker Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. ALL WE KNOW FROM FOX IS CAPTAIN AMERICA IS DEAD!!
Thanks Fox's for the News, its great that you take the time to report on these subjects thats not really News, O sorry I mean story's that of course are written in a way that they can be used as news if you are fucking retarded and inbreed!

FOX - writing story's to be used as news so you can decide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC