Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Detainees Ask Supreme Court To Guarantee Legal Rights. Why Do They Have To Ask?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 03:08 PM
Original message
Detainees Ask Supreme Court To Guarantee Legal Rights. Why Do They Have To Ask?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-03-05-scotus-guantanamo_N.htm?csp=24
Detainees ask Supreme Court to guarantee legal rights
Posted 2h 33m ago | Comment | Recommend E-mail | Save | Print |


Enlarge By Brennan Linsley, AP

A detainee sits alone inside a fenced area during his daily outside period at Guantanamo Bay prison.




WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawyers for Guantanamo detainees held more than five years without charges asked the Supreme Court Monday to step in a third time to guarantee that they can challenge their confinement in U.S. courts.
The detainees want the justices to hear their case and issue a decision before the court ends its term in early summer.

"Not only are these questions of paramount legal importance, but the extreme and worsening plight of the Guantanamo detainees make them questions of great humanitarian urgency as well," lawyers for the detainees wrote in court papers urging the justices to decide the case.

The court has twice ruled that foreigners imprisoned at the U.S. naval base in Cuba can pursue their cases in American courts, rejecting Bush administration arguments.

The latest Supreme Court appeal follows a federal appeals court ruling last month that limited detainees' legal rights. The 2-1 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld a key provision of the Military Commissions Act, which Bush pushed through Congress last year to set up a Defense Department system to prosecute terrorism suspects. Now, detainees must prove to three-officer military panels that they don't pose a terror threat.

FIND MORE STORIES IN: House | Congress | Supreme Court | George W Bush | Cuba | Guantanamo Bay | Guantanamo | United States | US Court
Separately, the justices said they would not grant quick review in the cases of two other Guantanamo detainees who have been designated by the Pentagon to face criminal charges in front of a military tribunal.

Salim Ahmed Hamdan of Yemen and Omar Khadr, a Canadian, wanted a high court ruling before their military trials take place, possibly as early as this summer.

If the court agrees to hear the other detainee cases on a fast track, arguments could be held May 7, the detainees lawyers said. The justices could render a decision by the customary end of their term in late June.

The administration does not oppose expedited consideration of the appeals, the lawyers said.

The island prison at the U.S. Navy base on land leased from Cuba has become a rallying cry for international and domestic criticism of administration policy in the war on terror.

Some of the nearly 400 prisoners have been at Guantanamo since the detention facility opened more than five years ago — after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. A number of detainees have committed suicide.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. We desperately need this amendment to the US Constitution
"All persons subject to the laws of the United States are guaranteed the rights, protections and priviledges of this constitution."

But I doubt very, very much that such an amendment would ever get proposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Will the Supremes overturn a David Sentelle decision?
Let's see if Roberts and Alito will show their loyalty to the constitution or to their political overlords. Developing . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC