Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Illinois Nazis, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, and R.W Zealots - the price we pay for freedom of speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 05:53 PM
Original message
Illinois Nazis, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, and R.W Zealots - the price we pay for freedom of speech
You know the scene from the move "The Blues Brothers", the 1980 comedy about two ne'er do well blues musicians "on a mission from God" to save an orphanage:

Jake and Elwood Blues are stuck in traffic waiting to cross a bridge. A cop walks by and they ask what's going on:

Jake: Hey, what's going on?
Officer: Ah, those bums won their courtcase so they're marching today.
Jake: What bums?
Officer: The f***ing Nazi party.
Elwood: Illinois Nazis
Jake: I hate Illinois Nazis

The Blues Brothers then do what we all would love to do in the same situation by revving up the 440 cubic inch engine of their retired 1974 Dodge Monaco police interceptor known as "the Bluesmobile" and chasing those Illinois Nazis off the bridge forcing them to jump ignominiously into the river below after which the counter-protestors all cheer and clap.

In the real world we can't run the "Illinois Nazis" off the bridge with our cars but we ought not to be afraid to stand up and tell them to sit down and shut the hell up already - we ought not to be afraid to tell them that we've already heard enough of their intolerant crap.

We've recently seen at least three particularly obnoxious examples of this type of intolerance in the ongoing 2008 Presidential campaign - one of which was directed at a Republican candidate - Mitt Romney - and two others against Democrats - John Edwards and Barack Obama.

In the case of Mitt Romney, the religious right have become so obsessed with establishing a "Christian" theocracy in this country (in spite of all of Jesus' teachings to the contrary) that they felt the need to call in the "Jesus Police" on Governor Romney now that he is running for his party's nomination for President.

As reported in the Orlando Sentinel recently (http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/elections/orl-romney1707feb17,0,7800076.story?track=mostemailedlink) , one such member of the self-appointed "Jesus Police" stood up and publicly chastised the former Republican governor as "a pretender who doesn't know the Lord" while he was in the Central Florida area visiting with voters in the Villages.

Well, excuse ME, but the last time I checked, this country was still run by the United States Constitution, not some zealot's very particular interpretation of the King James Bible.

According to Article VI of the U.S. Constitution: "No religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."

Governor Romney's choice of religion or even a lack thereof, then, is NOT a legitimate reason to decide to vote either FOR or AGAINST him. It just shows how out of hand things have become within the Republican Party that the former Governor should have even felt the need to defend his religious choices to such right wing religious zealots in the first place.

If this is how you feel about either religion or politics, then you would do both God and Country better service by refraining from participation in either activity.

In the case of Barack Obama, right wing obnoxious talking head Rush Limbaugh has repeatedly referred to him in recent times as Barack Obama Osama - a blatant attempt to smear him by gratuitously tying the Senator to Osama bin Laden merely by using the fact that their two names rhyme. Never mind that there is no logical or factual basis for this slander on Limbaugh's part - Limbaugh did it just to be malicious.

I hereby urge Senator Obama to put his Harvard law degree to good use by filing a slander lawsuit against Rush Limbaugh for defamation of character and make him finally pay dearly for slandering people over the years.

In the case of John Edwards we've just heard foul mouthed obnoxious right wing talking head Ann Coulter call him "a fa**ot" at the recent CPAC convention on television in front of the audience after being introduced, coincidentally by Mitt Romney (who by now probably wishes he had at least wore an EPA haz-mat suit while doing so).

This latest bizarre comment of Ann Coulter shows just how bitter, angry, disturbed and delusional she has become - that she would claim that John Edwards who has been married nearly the last 30 years with 4 children to the same woman is a homosexual - Are we even to even take her comments seriously? Or is it merely more ad-hominem rantings from a very angry very disturbed person?

Any real conservative would know that what adults do in their own bedroom is really nobody else's business, not the government's -and certainly not Ann Coulter's - Yet in Ann Coulter's warped little mind, this f word and homosexuality are probably her ultimate insults - a very nasty little word from a very nasty little person intended to hurt people whose politics she doesn't like.

To Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh and all you "Jesus Police" out there, I say: You are the very unfortunate price we must pay for freedom of speech in this country and we've long since paid enough.

We've heard enough from you so sit down and shut the hell up already!

Your hateful words really have no place in a country that prides itself on the notion that "all men are created equal" and begins its Constitution with the phrase "We the People". It's long since time for you apologize, sit down and shut up already.

To the right wing media and particularly to right wing organizations out there, I say: Stop handing these hateful little people a megaphone and putting them out in front of your parade.

They do your cause no good service and only make you look like a bunch of nut jobs - not "fair and balanced" as you claim to be. If you have a choice between George Will and Ann Coulter for your next show, let's all agree that you'll book George Will - OK?

This country deserves a serious discussion of the candidates and a serious discussion of the issues not more childish hateful name calling - let's all act like grown-ups this election cycle.

Disgusted,

Doug D.
Orlando, FL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. freedom of speech, however, does NOT mean a guaranteed audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. nor am I saying that it should...in fact I say the opposite...
in telling the RW media to dump these clowns.

Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A small but powerfu; segment of our pop are psychopaths: Bullies, Narcissists, and Abusers
Most are UNABLE to CHANGE...unwilling too.

Their brains have gone to a darker world....collectively. as in Brainwashed....

True discussion is outta the question...they only pretend to listen...minds made up a long time ago....ever notice that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah...these people are dangerous...and Coulter is a prime example
What the hell happened to her to make her act this way?

What an ass...

She's Jo Ann McCarthy as far as I'm concerned and the only way to deal with bullies is to pound them into the ground in front of everyone.

John and Elizabeth have been much too nice in their reply... They would have done much better to tell her to "sit down and shut her foul mouth up" directly in no uncertain terms to any reporter I could find.

Doug D.
Orlando, FL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I concur...Ann is an ASS...skinny pathetic one at that....and that witchy face...can you see her in
ten years?

Poor thang..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. If she lasts 10 years. . .

When I was looking for a certain Coulter article the other night (we were discussing her voter's registration deal).. I came across a chatside called "Yelp" in which people from various large cities can all jump on and discuss happenings in their area.

One of the people there was talking about a dinner that he attended with Ann Coulter (for whatever reason). Anyway, if that dude's account is accurate, it sure sounds like she has a eating disorder BIG TIME.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

A friend of mine was the president of College Republicans at an undiscolsed prestigious university of which i was also in attendance. The liberals brought in Michael Moore to speak, so he figured, they went controversial, he'll one up them by bringing in the devil... i mean Ann Coulter. And so it begins.


So in walks this woman with bleach blonde hair past her shoulders, which is wayyy too long for anyone over the age of 25, and her brown roots are quite visible which is strange for someone who probably earns a lot of money. She is a walking skeleton. Very, very skinny.


She sits down at dinner, sits directly across from me. I am staring eye to eye with Ann Coulter. There are about ten other kids at the table. Everyone is kissing her ass, because they're all stupid. The server brings out some bread, Coulter reaches for the basket immediately, pulls out the lone piece of corn bread and butters it like i've never seen anyone butter bread in my life. Her hands are literally shaking as she tears apart pieces of this square disaster, crumbs flying everywhere, me, about to vomit watching the globs of butter pass her lips. . . ..


I have never seen someone inhale food the way this woman did. She orders a glass of orange juice. . . at dinner . . . everyone else is drinking wine. . . she goes through 3 glasses of orange juice during the meal specially asks for more corn bread, which she devours with shaky little hands. She then excuses herself to use the rest room at least 3 times . . . which makes me wonder. . . as i knew a bulimic who drank orange juice because it helps you vomit easier. She's shaking like a crazy person though, which makes me wonder if its the nicotine patches, or if she's on diet pills or speed because the woman is talking a mile a minute..


http://www.yelp.com/topic/R5MCQFj-HYSjyis5vdlfNA


She was a whirlwind of existence. Just absolutely fanatically, horribly offensive, and blatantly had some sort of eating disorder.



So someone listening to the story asks:

So Ann Coulter is a bulemic? Wow..



Not certain -but who drinks 3 glasses of orange juice, scarfs down food like a starving child and uses the bathroom a minimum of 3 times?


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Unbelievable....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Apparently...her brain/thinking has been altered negatively producing a very
odd way of looking at things....so bitter, so grossly filled with hatred, and so whiney..

Typ of Pubs...she never offers a realistic/plausible solution to real problems...only denigrates and soils the area she stands on...typ Bully actions...

Bullies are often ATTENTION WHORES...I think she qualies....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. those people would be the FIRST to deny others the same rights they themselves DEMAND
Edited on Mon Mar-05-07 07:01 AM by HuffleClaw
as their leader says, 'there ought to be limits to freedom'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC