Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton to appear with Hillary in Selma

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 09:01 AM
Original message
Bill Clinton to appear with Hillary in Selma
White House rivals Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton will be in Selma, Ala., on Sunday to mark the anniversary of a bloody civil rights struggle -- with a surprise addition, former President Bill Clinton, nicknamed the first black president.

This will mark Bill Clinton's first public appearance to bolster his wife's 2008 bid and comes as she and Obama are competing for African-American votes. The former president will be inducted into the Voting Rights Hall of Fame -- the game plan floated earlier had the New York senator picking up the honor for him.

Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said the last-minute addition came as the ex-president was "rearranging his schedule to be there" because it was "an event he did not want to miss."

Obama and Hillary Clinton will speak from pulpits of two Selma churches blocks apart Sunday morning. They are participating in ceremonies marking the 42nd anniversary of marches and violent clashes that led to African Americans winning voting rights.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2007/03/sweet_column_bill_clintons_hil.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you WW, but I believe President Clinton will not be in Selma
for either speech. He will be arriving later for his induction into the National Voting Rights Museum Hall of Fame. It's unclear (at this time) if he will be there in time for the Bridge Walk.



Sunday's Selma Event to Be a Stage for Obama -- and Clinton(s)

By Anne E. Kornblut
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 2, 2007;

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/01/AR2007030101877.html


The main events this weekend will occur Sunday, when Obama speaks at a unity breakfast and then delivers the keynote address at Brown Chapel AME Church, the most historic church in Selma and the place where demonstrators organized for the 1965 march. Lewis plans to attend that service.

A short distance away, at precisely the same time, Clinton will speak at First Baptist Church.

Later that afternoon, Obama and Clinton are planning to participate in the crossing of the Edmund Pettus Bridge, where Lewis and his fellow demonstrators were turned back by baton-wielding police in 1965.

President Clinton plans to fly in that afternoon for his induction into the Hall of Fame at the National Voting Rights Museum, where his wife originally planned to represent him.



Senator Clinton will not be riding anyone's coattail(i.e another bashing post title). She is on her own until after the main events of the morning.

However, it has been reported that the Reverend's Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, along with Alabama Rep. Artur Davis will be present at Brown Chapel AME Church.


Rev's Jackson and Sharpton could have changed their plans. There is no updated guest or dignitary list, except for Senator Clinton's husband*.




* Don't most candidates travel with their spouses (& families) when schedules permit?
Is Senator Clinton being held to a different standard? A double standard ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Another subtle hit piece on Hillary....
of course Bill Clinton will be there, he is being inducted into the Hall of Fame for Voting Rights. It never mentions if Obama's wife will be there. Every presidential candidate appears at events with their spouses and it should be no different for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Question
Edited on Fri Mar-02-07 09:49 AM by Ethelk2044
How can it be a hit piece when it clearly states, that the spokesman said he will rearrange his schedule in order for him to be there. If he had previous plans on being there his spokesman would not have stated that.


Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said the last-minute addition came as the ex-president was "rearranging his schedule to be there" because it was "an event he did not want to miss."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. What difference does it make if he rearranged his schedule...
or not. He is being honored and has every right to be there for that reason and also as Hillary's husband. It is the implication that he is going to help Hillary and if so, what is wrong with that. Will Obama's wife be there? Do you think Obama is there for political reasons too, of course he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. What difference doees it make? It shows how worried the Clintons are about Obama
How the joint Clinton trip came about was a subject of some debate: The senator's advisers dismissed the suggestion that the former president is rushing in at the last minute to help his wife's standing among black voters. But they admitted that the decision was made yesterday, more than a week after Hillary Clinton made her plans to go to Selma.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content//article/2007/03/01/AR2007030101877.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It shows nothing of the kind..
their decision might have been made for reasons not mentioned in the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Really? Hillary's advisors "admitted that the decision was made yesterday." Coincidence, hardly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. As a Democrat, the Washington Post, doesn't tell me what to think
If you read this OP there is nothing even close to intimating fear of Obama in the article.
The only "fear of Obama" statement came from the WashingtonPost, a RW rag, and your post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. This should be interesting
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC