Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What IF we Elect Hillary...thinking we Can Go Back to Clinton Heady Days of Dot Com Wonder?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:21 PM
Original message
What IF we Elect Hillary...thinking we Can Go Back to Clinton Heady Days of Dot Com Wonder?
Edited on Mon Feb-26-07 08:22 PM by KoKo01
Can Hillary's Hubby keep his "sock in the pocket?" Can Hillary DIVORCE HIM in her FIRST "100 Days" so that HER AGENDA for Health Care and a REASONED APROACH to Iraq/Afghaistan can take hold?

Can Hillary REFORM NAFTA for FAIR TRADE as Opposed to FREE TRADE? Is Hillary willing to Concede that NAFTA the "dream of DLC" NEEDS REVISION?

If Al Gore doesn't run...I might consider Hillary...but SHE HAS GIVEN ME NOTHING TO GRASP MY PROGRESSIVE FINGERS AROUND!

I hope that her SUPPORTERS can help me here.

Otherwise I'm waiting for Gore and will vote Kucinich... I WANT CHANGE!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary's about as progressive a president as you're ever gonna get
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You are thinking that a "more progressive" is "Unelectible?
WHY? Why NOT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hell no. I'm thinking Hillary's a lot more progressive than what she's given credit for here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Convince me Hillary is More Progressive, then. I told you My Problems
with her...and give me a synopsis of WHY she's different? :shrug:

(You know...most DU'ers don't read past the "Subject Line" and really don't go to the "Links" because of time/computer restraints...so whatever is her "Agenda" it needs to be condensed into Three or Four Lines of type...

It is what it is...given the limited time of viewers on this site trying to feed families...working 24/7 and sneaking peaks at DU for their views. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I agree - Hillary behind closed doors fought for single payer - and the ins industry had to work the
DLC and Clinton quite hard so that when Bill gave her the task force he also told her to stay away from single payer.

She is a progressive - much more liberal than Bill - the GOP right wing are correct about that. Which is why I smile as she sets up the mantra that she's so "centrist" for the 08 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. If that is true, how do you know that she won't govern from the center once elected
Fearing that if she governs from the left, she won't get re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. I don't know the future - I only know the past via being involved with the ins. co lobbyists at the
time as the head of a major tax department.

In 93 they were already elected and she wanted single payer and fought for it.

What she would do in the future is anyones guess - my guess is that she would try for GOP support and compromise where possible because she is not at war with the GOP - although many in the GOP are at war with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dream on Hillary is into the cut and run economics of off-shoring.
It's actually quite disappointing to me how few of the many democrats still running are supporters of "free" trade as opposed to regulated fair trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Under Capitalism
there will NEVER be any such thing as "free trade"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
30. yes it's an oxymoron, but as I use it I mean trade unencumbered by regulation
or other barriers.

I don't think free-trade is a sustainable concept with a society. It creates a system in which teaches ignoring the social costs "trade" creates is a good thing. It seems to me it's extreme endpoint is a wasted, polluted landscape populated by mostly unhealthy impoverished slaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Ah, the libertarian wet dream
I get it... :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AshevilleGuy Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. If she were to win, it would be prudent
for Bill to stay at home in NY, at least for the first months of her term. It would give her some breathing room in the Oval Office. I know it would kill him to do it, but he could at least for appearance sake; it would be a quick trip for him to come to the WH for state dinners, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. If she wins, it will be BECAUSE people want Bill in the Whitehouse.
I disagree with you- if she wins the nom & does beat the Republican, it will be because folks want Bill back.

Keeping Bill on the sidelines is a no-can-do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AshevilleGuy Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. At some point I believe we will see her
*suggest* that she will be her own president. This might arise from pressure from repooks, accusations that if she wins, she will be a figurehead for Bill. I agree that many people want Bill back (as do I), but many more will NOT want that. Pleasing both sides will be a tough balancing act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Hard to argue with that- you might be right...
I tend to think that a "wink-wink-nod-nod" suggestion that Bill will play a huge roll-if not an equal or eclisping one, can only help her- the media & GOP can whine all they want-voters wont care...

Then again, I've never seen a RW/media frame that Hillary didnt swallow whole rather than challenge (Saddam has WMDs, 100% correct anti-war people are "nay-sayers", Kerry hates the troops, etc), so you might be right. If she took the bait on that and down-played Bill, it would not help her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Bill Clinton is the "Silver Tongued Devil" of American Politics in 20th Century after FDR..and
Edited on Mon Feb-26-07 09:12 PM by KoKo01
FDR had a whole other PLATE OF PROBLEMS on his MENU...and spoke to a different audience. There's NO ONE who can listen to Bill Clinton on whatever issue is his "flavor of the month" and not have tears streaming down their face...listening to him.

But...Been There...DONE THAT! Don't want any more Panderers/Rock Stars filled with Charisma and looks that appeal to Pander to MY VOTE that DOESN'T EVEN COUNT ANY MORE!

GIVE ME SUBSTANCE! GIVE ME "PERSPECTIVE" on "HOW" you Differ from the BUSHIES!!! Don't give me NAFTA WORKED...and FREE TRADE IS FAIR TRADE...Don't give me "HEALTH CARE FOR ALL" and then get in and BACK TRACK...Don't GIVE ME...CLEAN UP GOVERNMENT and then USE WHAT BUSH/CHENEY HAS DONE as your "Starting Point"...Don't GIVE ME...ENVIRONMENT Depends on CHEAP IMPORTS...We've BEEN THERE DONE THAT...and We Ship our TEAR DOWNS and BOMBED BUILDINGS to CHINA for SCRAP while they Import GOODS to WalMart, TARGET, BB&B, Walgreens/JC Penney/Sears/Home Depot/Lowes and all the rest of our "So Called American Stores" where all of us Maxed out Credit Card Users and "Mortgage Re-Financers" tend to SHOP!

I'm hoping to hear how the greatist DEBAUCLE of AMERICAN TRADE will be solved or is EVEN RECOGNIZED BY HILLARY...AND...the REST OF THEM....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. No you're not. You're not looking for anything
except an opportunity to slam the Clintons. Why not be honest about it?

Oh, and what's with all the caps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Can you give me a reason to vote for Hillary/Bill Redux...is what I'm asking
and instead of attacking ME...think of all those Americans out there who are so much less informed that those of us here...including You!

GIVE ME MEAT about why we want Hillary to serve?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Hillary is on the bottom of my list of choices
so you're asking the wrong person to convince you to vote for her. My objections are your right wing attacks on the Clintons. You deserve to be called on them. Don't like it? Don't post crap about Bill keeping it in his pants, or Hillary divorcing him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Back on Track for Thread...What will Hillary DO FOR AMERICAN Policy?
What does she hope to ACHIEVE? Roll back of Bush II and Cheney? Where would she target REFORM FIRST?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
38. how the Clintons differ from the Bushes
here are 4 good references for the accomplishments of the Clinton administration
I think anyone reading them can pretty readily come up with some differences between the last six years and the eight years that preceded them.

http://home.att.net/~jrhsc/jobwelldone.html

http://www.liberalslikechrist.org/about/clinton.html

http://www.perkel.com/politics/clinton/accomp.htm

http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/New/html/20000204_13.html


ps - HRC voted against CAFTA - I think it's obvious that she understands that NAFTA, as it stands now, needs changes. OTOH, if you expect her to adopt KUcinich's positions on free trade, ie; no WTO, no NAFTA, I expect you'll be disappointed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. wow, just wow
Can Hillary's Hubby keep his "sock in the pocket?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AshevilleGuy Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yeah, what would he DO all day?
Can you imagine: Bill just rattling around the WH all day, popping into the Oval Office every short while to see what Hilary is doing. Dropping by the VP office suite, dropping remarks like, "Well, when we were here BEFORE, Al Gore used to..." . Arguing with her staff for having his own chair and desk brought into the Oval Office. The possiblities are endless.

Reminds me of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert. They had their desks side by side, he offered suggestions that she sometimes took and sometimes haughtily brushed aside. But she was still the Sovereign, and he not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. check this out
Edited on Mon Feb-26-07 09:13 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AshevilleGuy Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Didn't work
The clip kept shutting on and off. I have no clue how to make it work. Thanks anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. It would DRIVE HIM CRAZY! His restless Mind! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. And I'm accused of using RW talking points...
The delusion is complete...these people don't even recognize the RW tools they have become...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. how did Ann Coulter get over 40,000 posts here?
Edited on Mon Feb-26-07 10:04 PM by wyldwolf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. No, we will go back to the days
of the Starr chamber or its successor. Constant harsh hysteria magnified and gobbled up by the media.

Right now looking at Edwards, Dodd, Richardson and hoping Clark announces. All go by the wayside if Al steps in.

I crave the combination of experience, wisdom and tested progressive values. Neither Hillary or Obama do it for me right now - each for different reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. So many of us ...fighting sine Supremes Chose Chimp/Cheney are looking for
Experience with Wisdom...Hope without Angst in the Closet Wating...NORMAL FOLKS. (The Bushies "appear normal) but...we now know to be VERY WARY of the "Appearance" of "Normal."

What is "Normal"...well...that might be up to psychological interpretation ...that there IS NO NORMAL...but the example of Bush/Cheney and their years as squatters in the WH living under Supreme's Mandate can give us at least a "Base Line" for comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. Clinton's economy wasn't based on any "dot com wonder..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
28. you do know Al Gore was Clinton's point man on NAFTA
Here's Gore's words on NAFTA:

You know, during the Clinton-Gore administration, we faced a couple of big challenges on that front. There was a financial crisis in Mexico and we took the bold step of shoring them up. And then when it came to this agreement to try to strengthen their economy and get more good jobs down there to slow down the flow of immigration, I think we did the right thing.

I think other developments in the aftermath of those years, principally the rise of China and the movement of jobs from Mexico to China and to other Asian countries, made the situation worse than it would have otherwise been. But without the agreement that was made and without the shoring up of their economy back then, it could have been much worse still.

KING: Was that night fun for you?

GORE: The debate? Well, it was like a prize fight or something in the debating arena. And thank you for hosting it. And of course, he had -- Ross Perot had been on your show so many times. I called you up out of the blue, and everybody was against it in the White House except for me and Bill Clinton. Everybody else said, oh, it was a terrible mistake.


This was from 8 months ago...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. And for Jimmy Carter fans...
Me included...

He served as chairman along with Bush, Ford, and Reagan of the NAFTA Commission...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. I like a policy of a balanced budget and debt reduction.
If that is what is being referred to as the Clinton days...sign me up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
34. Conason and Lyon's "The Hunting of the President" has the answer to your "sock" comment.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. I read it and watched the Documentary...Conason and Lyons reporting on the witchhunt
against the Clintons over at Salon back in the late 90's keep me and other Clinton supporters sane. There weren't blogs then and very few liberal online sites.

The problem is that neither Bill nor Hillary since leaving the White House said a peep about the RW Coverage. After Hillary's comment about "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" it seems odd she has courted Rupert Murdoch and Bill hangs out with Poppy.

The fact is..Bill had some problems with a roving eye and cigar. If the dalliance with Monica was a lie made up by the RW Conspiracy then he should say so. That the RW Media hounded both of them over trivial and private affairs doesn't mean that they won't do it again...following every move Bill makes and lying and making up stories when it suits them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. "roving eye and cigar"A fixation of convenience for Clinton detractors. It should have
never been an issue then, OR now. That's the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
37. I don't think people are thinking that Clinton would take us back


to before.

people want this current series of crimes to be remedied and the country put back together again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
39. That ship has sailed
The conditions that allowed for the heady 1990's of Bill's term no longer exist. We have outsourced so much of our manufacturing and IT infrastructure since the 90's, not to mention the enormous loss of American prestige and power that has been the hallmark of the current administration. When Bill came to power, we weren't embroiled in two major wars like we are now.
My point is:
Under better conditions, I think Hillary would make a fine President. I have my issues with her but I understand the realities of politics. Give a little, get a little.

However, the current conditions in America and our position in the world is now much different and we need not merely someone good, but someone great. We someone with the vision to take the ball and run with it, someone willing to risk their life and political career to make the broad sweeping changes that this country sorely needs. This nation yearns for such a leader, but I don't think Hillary is that leader.
Are any of the other current candidates that leader? I don't know. The only one I think that really has that quality I see is Al Gore. The many efforts to draft him to run and his Oscar are examples of the people's desire for real leadership. He is THE big Unaswered Question of this election so far. His decision to run could change everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDP Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
40. If we elect Hillary then we are the dumbest country on the planet full of the most suckers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC