Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama had it right in 2002

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 01:15 PM
Original message
Obama had it right in 2002
I'm not a big Obama fan.

I think he has enormous potential, but I'm still steaming about his glib catering to the religionists.

As far as I'm concerned, he can be as Christian or Muslim or Jewish or whatever as he wants. And I don't begrudge him talking up whatever role religion might play in his life. But the truth be told, he's blatantly using religion to prop himself up, at a cost to other Democrats, whom he paints as less moral because they don't couch their values in Christian terms.

All that said, this video shows that we're dealing with a guy who can really get things right.

If he can avoid being a Slick Obama that tries to be all things to all people, I could get behind this guy.

While I'm still rooting hard for Gore to get in the race, I have to admit that I like what I see in the video clip.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sodenoue Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama's Still Got it Right
Obama 08!

Gore (III) commented in a December 14, 2006, article in the New York Observer: "I know that has no plans to run in 2008 <...> Well, I guess I have to add his addendum. I think the way he always says it is, 'I don't see any circumstances under which I would run for president'."

Gore won in 2000 and the bushites stole America from us. If Al doesn't want to run it is understandable. He won once and still did not get to be president. I would be weary as well.

Obama is the man!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acadia Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. He is a chance to get rid of the "old boy" network that has infected
so many people in Washington. We need to change the election laws and the dirty money the now allows only the super rich and the super rich corporate supporters to control who becomes our leaders. The money is the most corrupting of all. The crises in the middle class, and Clinton who wanted NAFTA and got it, are examples of money controlling everything.

I want Hillary and the DLC out. Richardson, Obama, Edwards.....we need a new start. I know Richardson is not poor nor Edwards but they seem to have not joined the American aristocracy yet. And Bill Clinton is responsible for NAFTA, by not vetoeing it and supporting it, and the telecommunicastions act that promoted big money and big consolodation and other affronts to democracy. Let us not forget WACO. I don't like religious crazies, but don't want to hurt them either or take away their civil rights. Bill and HIllary are really pink elephants. I don't give a hoot about his private sex life but do care about the policies that hurt the middle class. He joined with the PUBS on these and Hillary supports them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama had it right on Iraq from the get-go.
That's a really important distinction and consideration, at least for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Definitely
No question, if I had to choose between Obama and Hillary, he'd get the nod on that alone.

I've previously suggested two ways Dems who voted for the war could come clean about it. HRC has, at times, owned up to one form of apology -- the defensible idea that giving the president the power to do his job (leverage over a rogue state) wasn't the problem... it was the president's abuse of that power.

But better still are people like Gore and Obama who took the long view on this tough issue and realized that, you know, we simply cannot trust *this* president (who was almost certainly going to start the war even if and when inspections were resumed in earnest), and they were willing to take the heat for saying so.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC