Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Surprise! Surprise! NYT reports Congress Finds Ways to Avoid Lobbyist Limits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 06:13 PM
Original message
Surprise! Surprise! NYT reports Congress Finds Ways to Avoid Lobbyist Limits
This is why we need public financing of Congressional and Presidential campaigns, and we need it NOW! Nothing has changed with the "sweeping new rules" to clean up the way business is done in Washington. It is the same old "pay to play" legalized bribery.

February 11, 2007

Congress Finds Ways to Avoid Lobbyist Limits

By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK

WASHINGTON, Feb. 10 — The 110th Congress opened with the passage of sweeping new rules intended to curb the influence of lobbyists by prohibiting them from treating lawmakers to meals, trips, stadium box seats or the discounted use of private jets.

But it did not take long for lawmakers to find ways to keep having lobbyist-financed fun.

In just the last two months, lawmakers invited lobbyists to help pay for a catalog of outings: lavish birthday parties in a lawmaker’s honor ($1,000 a lobbyist), martinis and margaritas at Washington restaurants (at least $1,000), a California wine-tasting tour (all donors welcome), hunting and fishing trips (typically $5,000), weekend golf tournaments ($2,500 and up), a Presidents’ Day weekend at Disney World ($5,000), parties in South Beach in Miami ($5,000), concerts by the Who or Bob Seger ($2,500 for two seats), and even Broadway shows like “Mary Poppins” and “The Drowsy Chaperone” (also $2,500 for two).

The lobbyists and their employers typically end up paying for the events, but within the new rules.

Instead of picking up the lawmaker’s tab, lobbyists pay a political fund-raising committee set up by the lawmaker. In turn, the committee pays the legislator’s way.Lobbyists and fund-raisers say such trips are becoming increasingly popular, partly as a quirky consequence of the new ethics rules. By barring lobbyists from mingling with a lawmaker or his staff for the cost of a steak dinner, the restrictions have stirred new demand for pricier tickets to social fund-raising events. Lobbyists say that the rules might even increase the volume of contributions flowing from K Street, where many lobbying firms have their offices, to Congress.

much more...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/11/us/politics/11trips.html?ei=5094&en=e1bbc0cbbdc25f89&hp=&ex=1171170000&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. The more things change....
The more they stay the same.

The best democracy money can buy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Steny "K Street" Hoyer sided with John Boehner when questioned about this article on MTP.
This, sadly, is no surprise. Hoyer agrees with Boehner that all that's needed is disclosure, and that neither the American people or Congress would support taxpayers' money being used to fund Congressional campaigns.

These corrupted politicians like the system the way it is. They have the upper hand when lobbyists are legally allowed to fill their campaign coffers, making them less vulnerable to challengers. It is a rigged game, and the American people are the losers. A Congressman enthalled to a lobbyist who serve as his campaign fundraiser is one compromised legislator.

What is legal in our system of campaign fundraising is truly astounding. If the American people understood this, they would demand public financing of federal campaigns. Unfortunately, they do not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. And the progressives were correct
AGAIN. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC